changeset 717:bd83d7419ad6

<itidus21> pastelogs assume.*only one
author HackBot
date Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:32:29 +0000
parents e1486c300b93
children f7f9d336aab7
files paste/paste.20219
diffstat 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/paste/paste.20219	Thu Sep 27 20:32:29 2012 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+2009-01-09.txt:17:50:11: <AnMaster> ehird, well I'd assume only one would do the drawing bit, to make it consistent, and so on. If not he is some sort of super-productive multi-skilled genius...
+2009-03-31.txt:22:04:36: <AnMaster> foo*bar is multiplication, foo**bar then? what is that? multiplying a dereferenced pointer I would assume, but that is certainly confusing. There is only one valid way to interpret it but still
+2009-06-10.txt:19:20:27: <fizzie> I assume some sort of "there can be only one" swordfight is involved.
+2009-09-04.txt:17:46:25: <AnMaster> but I would assume I'm the only one still using a PS/2 keyboard
+2010-03-02.txt:21:50:02: <alise> You assume there is only one format per single type.
+2010-03-09.txt:23:12:54: <ais523> I somehow assumed that you'd capture with only one point left
+2011-04-17.txt:20:44:21: <olsner> I think they can assume you're the only one playing the game at that time - if anything gets hacked anywhere it's obviously you who did it :)
+2011-10-22.txt:22:40:19: <bd_> there's too much code that assumes there's only one player though
+2011-12-27.txt:18:40:45: <colloinkgravisom> If you assume only one family exists at any given time.
+2011-12-27.txt:18:41:47: <colloinkgravisom> (a) Yeah, but the best impossible things are possible things! (b) So you WANT to assume only one family is alive in the entire world for any given generation?
+2012-09-24.txt:15:26:36: <atriq> That I'm annoyed that people assume there's only one kind of sign language
+2012-09-24.txt:15:31:07: <itidus21> i get this from the first 2 lines annoyed_by(annoyed_by(people assume there's only one kind of sign language))