--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/paste/paste.27164	Thu Apr 19 11:49:50 2012 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+2008-03-22.txt:00:34:39: <Slereah> What I find amusing is that Conservapedia doesn't like Andrew Wiles proof.
+2008-06-25.txt:10:16:04: <Bishopshate> http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Lenski_dialog
+2008-09-18.txt:17:42:55: <tusho> http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution
+2008-11-05.txt:07:01:17: <GregorR> http://www.conservapedia.com/Barack_Obama // Hahahaha, this is so over-the-top-libelous it's not so much offensive as surreal :P
+2008-11-05.txt:14:32:15: <ehird> lol that conservapedia article
+2008-11-06.txt:16:04:21: <ehird> -- Conservapedia
+2008-11-06.txt:16:04:36: <ehird> [[If elected, Obama would likely become the first Muslim President, and could use the Koran to be sworn into office.]] - also conservapedia
+2009-02-23.txt:00:11:51: <oklopol> http://www.conservapedia.com/Diagonalization
+2009-02-23.txt:00:13:18: <GregorR> Ah yes, conservapedia, truly MY reliable source of information.
+2009-02-23.txt:00:13:24: <Slereah> Yep, I'm on conservapedia
+2009-02-23.txt:00:14:31: <GregorR> Even for conservapedia that's pretty retarded :P
+2009-02-23.txt:14:49:36: <ehird> i love conservapedia
+2009-04-16.txt:17:11:39: <ehird> — http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution
+2009-04-16.txt:17:11:43: <ehird> How I love Conservapedia.
+2009-04-16.txt:17:12:08: <Slereah> Conservapedia on evolution isn't fun, ehird
+2009-04-16.txt:17:12:44: <pikhq> Conservapedia was really fun when it had relativity deniers.
+2009-04-16.txt:17:13:52: <pikhq> Conservapedia denied that.
+2009-04-16.txt:17:14:13: <Slereah> What I love about Conservapedia is when it gets crazy on unrelated matters
+2009-04-16.txt:21:50:25: <kerlo> I wonder why Conservapedia even mentions mathematics.
+2009-06-04.txt:22:44:15: <ehird> conservapedia ftw
+2009-06-04.txt:22:50:57: <ehird> http://conservapedia.com/William_Lane_Craig
+2009-08-09.txt:18:42:52: <ehird> http://conservapedia.com/Barack_Obama
+2009-08-09.txt:19:10:44: <ehird> Anyway, Conservapedia's Atheism article used to start with a picture of Hitler.
+2009-08-09.txt:19:16:52: <pikhq> GregorR-L: We got here from discussing Conservapedia's article on Obama.
+2009-08-09.txt:19:18:09: <ehird> Hey, maybe Conservapedia is part of Obama's socialist eugenics program.
+2009-08-09.txt:19:18:29: <ehird> Anyone who makes a non-satiric edit to Conservapedia won't be allowed to breed when the program comes into place.
+2009-08-09.txt:19:18:55: <ais523> don't Conservapedia claim that they'll sue vandals?
+2009-08-09.txt:19:19:06: <ehird> http://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Commandments
+2009-08-09.txt:19:20:48: <ehird> Only True Americans who work can access Conservapedia, and they have jobs.
+2009-10-05.txt:17:02:23: <Deewiant> -- http://conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project
+2009-10-05.txt:17:13:21: <ais523> I'm wondering if it's a splinter group formed by the people who joined conservapedia just to troll
+2009-10-05.txt:17:13:45: <ais523> (statistically speaking, we can expect at least one thus-far-undetected conservapedia troll)
+2010-03-14.txt:03:01:31: <coppro> I read it on Conservapedia!
+2010-04-30.txt:22:44:48: <Phantom_Hoover> I mention this because of this: http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Richard_Dawkins
+2010-04-30.txt:22:45:24: <alise> Conservapedia contents are hating techniques, not debating techniques :-)
+2010-04-30.txt:22:45:41: <alise> [[It appears as if both the political left and the political right are beginning to perceive the atheist and evolutionist Richard Dawkins as a "clown". The Huffington Post and the Canadian publication the National Post have both referred to Richard Dawkins as a "clown" recently. Conservapedia is considering adding material to its Richard Dawkins article in order to incorporate the public's growing perception that Dawkins is a clown. Dawkins certainly has a
+2010-04-30.txt:22:46:05: -!- alise changed the topic of #esoteric to: Conservapedia is considering adding material to its Richard Dawkins article in order to incorporate the public's growing perception that Dawkins is a clown. | http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/esoteric/?C=M;O=D
+2010-05-06.txt:16:36:17: <beinghuman> http://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Richard_Dawkins_Project#Dawkins_the_clown
+2010-05-06.txt:18:39:04: * Rugxulo is confused ... wtf is Conservapedia?
+2010-05-06.txt:18:43:36: <Phantom_Hoover> Conservapedia was pretty funny back in the day.
+2010-05-09.txt:18:43:33: <Phantom_Hoover> http://www.conservapedia.com/Linear_algebra#Application:_Analyzing_Liberal_style_on_Wikipedia
+2010-05-09.txt:18:49:23: <olsner> conservapedia :(
+2010-05-25.txt:15:29:24: <Phantom_Hoover> I meant Conservapedia.
+2010-05-28.txt:19:05:03: <Phantom_Hoover> http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Considering_An_Open_Letter_to_Richard_Dawkins_at_Conservapedia <-- More insane
+2010-07-28.txt:11:16:55: <Phantom_Hoover> Wow, I just looked at Conservapedia's article on Enccyclopædia Dramatica.
+2010-07-28.txt:11:20:43: <Ilari> Conservapedia... One more proof of that there are hardcore lunatics out there...
+2010-08-08.txt:00:39:07: <Sgeo> http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words#Decrypt
+2010-08-08.txt:00:39:18: <alise> Ah, Conservapedia.
+2010-08-08.txt:00:42:01: <augur> conservapedia
+2010-08-08.txt:00:42:53: <coppro> conservapedia
+2010-08-08.txt:16:34:40: <Phantom_Hoover> Generally, http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_The_transitional_animal_the_flying_kitty%3F
+2010-08-09.txt:19:22:11: <alise> http://conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity
+2010-08-09.txt:19:33:18: <alise> theory: fax uses conservapedia
+2010-08-09.txt:22:09:38: <alise> "A Colbert Report interview featured this project." --http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project
+2010-08-09.txt:22:45:10: <alise> cpressey: & admin of Conservapedia.
+2010-08-09.txt:22:46:01: <Ilari> Well, admin of Conservapedia => idiot extraordinare. But what is his father's claim to fame?
+2010-08-09.txt:22:46:03: <alise> http://www.conservapedia.com/Mystery:Why_Do_Non-Conservatives_Exist?
+2010-08-12.txt:23:41:41: <pikhq> Conservapedia's denying relativity again.
+2010-08-12.txt:23:42:10: <Flonk> Conservapedia? :D
+2010-08-16.txt:18:20:43: <alise> --Conservapedia, "Counterexamples to Relativity".
+2010-08-16.txt:20:28:35: <Phantom_Hoover_> http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Success
+2010-10-01.txt:17:34:29: <Phantom_Hoover> http://www.conservapedia.com/Obamageddon THIS WORKS EVEN BETTER WITH AN ATHEIST NON-RHOTIC ACCENT
+2010-10-09.txt:22:40:47: <Phantom_Hoover> http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Finland&diff=next&oldid=332117
+2010-10-22.txt:14:59:57: <elliott> "Ed, I know I've only been around now and again - the family and work come first! - but I have the real inside scoop on an atheist meeting in the UK. Some really big names, some really shocking talks." -- Conservapedia
+2010-10-24.txt:17:56:14: <Phantom_Hoover> http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_10_telltale_signs_you_are_on_your_way_to_becoming_an_atheist_nerd
+2010-11-12.txt:18:56:32: <Phantom_Hoover> http://conservapedia.com/ConservaMath_Medal
+2010-11-12.txt:19:21:15: <oklopol> it surprises me greatly that conservapedia has an article on infinity, i was pretty sure they were all finitists
+2010-11-12.txt:19:24:15: <elliott> oklopol: it surprises me greatly that conservapedia has an article on infinity, i was pretty sure they were all finitists
+2010-11-12.txt:19:25:34: <Gregor> http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Random <-- how to kill yourself
+2010-11-12.txt:19:27:40: <elliott> oklopol: http://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity
+2010-11-12.txt:19:39:09: <oklopol> http://conservapedia.com/Axiom_of_Infinity
+2010-12-30.txt:10:10:43: <coppro> http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Conservapedia
+2011-01-02.txt:21:20:14: <Phantom_Hoover> elliott, you fail to understand that a significant driving force behind RW's policy is being the opposite of Conservapedia.
+2011-01-02.txt:21:20:23: <elliott> Phantom_Hoover: RATIONALWIKI PREDATES CONSERVAPEDIA (iirc)
+2011-01-02.txt:21:21:13: <elliott> Phantom_Hoover: I guess nobody realised that the opposite of Conservapedia is LiberalUnjustifiedNutjobPedia.
+2011-01-02.txt:21:22:11: <elliott> If you say "but RW is humorous", well ... I can't bring myself to take Conservapedia seriously either. :P
+2011-01-03.txt:00:45:51: <Phantom_Hoover> elliott, WIGO CP is the blow-by-blow report on Conservapedia; it spread from there.
+2011-01-03.txt:00:49:52: <elliott> Then again, one could argue that Conservapedia has actually turned into a satire wiki and its owner is just too dumb to realise that.
+2011-04-01.txt:12:26:45: <elliott> "On another note, I'm quickly growing tired of the undue snarkiness and senseless arrogance of the Brit Clique, as I call them, here on Wiki... It's no wonder a bunch morons a few years back went and made Conservapedia. Not that I like that place either. Plus I'm banned from it... lol..." --[[User:Jros83]]
+2011-04-05.txt:15:00:37: <Phantom_Hoover> I appear to be 403ed from Conservapedia.
+2011-04-13.txt:21:55:19: <elliott> "↑ Bad experiences with power-tripping Conservapedia sysops, and the nature of sysop chores have made them call sysopship a "demotion"."
+2011-05-22.txt:08:37:36: <Sgeo> According to Conservapedia's Conservative Bible Project, Jesus never said these words. They are a liberal coruption of the text. "This quotation is a favorite of liberals but should not appear in a conservative Bible." 23:34
+2011-06-08.txt:17:03:52: <Sgeo> Conservapedia makes me laugh
+2011-06-08.txt:17:04:23: <Sgeo> http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Counterexamples_to_Evolution/archive1#Some_Comments
+2011-06-08.txt:17:08:30: <elliott> Sgeo: almost the entire world is blocked IP-wise (403) from Conservapedia
+2011-06-08.txt:17:09:19: <elliott> but evidently Conservapedia's five editors aren't affected
+2011-06-08.txt:17:32:36: <zzo38> And why did Conservapedia block everyone?
+2011-06-25.txt:17:31:06: <Gregor> Conservapedia's news section's coverage of the New York gay marriage bill puts the word "marriage" in scare quotes X-D
+2011-06-25.txt:17:33:27: <Phantom_Hoover> Gregor, you can still get Conservapedia?
+2011-06-25.txt:17:34:40: <tswett> Yeah, doesn't Conservapedia only allow access to people in the US or something?
+2011-06-25.txt:17:41:12: <tswett> Conservapedia's energy on homeopathy seems pretty accurate.
+2011-06-25.txt:17:56:33: <Gregor> monqy: That's the joy of Conservapedia!
+2011-06-25.txt:17:56:40: <monqy> oh conservapedia
+2011-06-25.txt:18:01:10: <Gregor> newsham: Yes, it's right here on Conservapedia!
+2011-06-25.txt:18:05:08: <Gregor> It's a good thing they claim "pseudoscience", since it makes up the bulk of Conservapedia :P
+2011-06-25.txt:18:05:15: <monqy> how much of conservapedia is literally a joke
+2011-09-22.txt:17:19:47: <elliott> "Artist's conception of soul joining the fertilized egg at conception." --Conservapedia caption
+2011-09-22.txt:17:20:32: <elliott> http://www.conservapedia.com/Human_reproduction
+2011-09-22.txt:17:42:15: <elliott> http://conservapedia.com/images/9/93/Soul_Conception.jpg
+2011-09-22.txt:17:45:37: <elliott> http://conservapedia.com/ADA_(programming_language) ;; they miscapitalised Ada. Burn.
+2011-09-22.txt:17:47:13: <elliott> No Conservapedia stop no.
+2011-09-22.txt:17:48:13: <fizzie> Conservapedia: the best way to learn how to program?
+2011-09-22.txt:17:48:51: <elliott> [[conservapedia:Ada Lovelace]] is disappointingly light on THAT WIMMEN CAN'T HAVE DONE PROGRAMMED IT SHE MUST HAVE GOT HER HUSBAND TO DO IT.
+2011-09-22.txt:17:49:28: <Phantom_Hoover> http://conservapedia.com/Evolutionary_algorithm
+2011-09-22.txt:17:49:32: <CakeProphet> elliott: on conservapedia America is the best place with the best opinions.
+2011-09-22.txt:17:51:01: <CakeProphet> I wonder how many contribute to conservapedia as a parody of conservative opinions.
+2011-09-22.txt:17:56:37: <ais523> didn't Conservapedia famously threaten to sue trolls?
+2011-09-22.txt:17:57:25: <elliott> "Unproductive activity, such as 90% talk page edits and only 10% quality edits to Conservapedia articles, may result in blocking of the account.[7] See the Guidelines for more detail."
+2011-09-22.txt:18:14:35: <Phantom_Hoover> <ais523> didn't Conservapedia famously threaten to sue trolls?
+2011-09-22.txt:19:33:26: <CakeProphet> conservapedia is so entertaining.
+2011-10-04.txt:20:18:08: <fizzie> oerjan: Are there conservapedia db-dumps?
+2011-11-20.txt:01:48:56: <shachaf> elliott: Fortunately there's Conservapedia.
+2011-11-20.txt:01:49:46: * shachaf looks up [[Talk:Main Page]] on Conservapedia.
+2011-11-20.txt:01:52:37: <elliott> Oh, someone beat me to it: http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#Gambling_story
+2011-11-20.txt:01:54:39: <pikhq_> I think the worst part about Conservapedia is that it's not a troll.
+2011-11-20.txt:01:56:03: <shachaf> "Schlafly created Conservapedia in November 2006.[12] He felt the need to start the project after reading a student's assignment written using Common Era dating notation rather than the Anno Domini system that he preferred."
+2011-11-20.txt:01:57:20: <Gregor> Underlying logic: See: Conservapedia.
+2011-11-20.txt:02:33:32: <CakeProphet> elliott: http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Jesus_Christ
+2011-11-20.txt:02:34:29: <CakeProphet> Funny how this page is locked depsite conservapedia asking for people to edit it. previous unsigned comment added by User:Wikipediaisbetter
+2011-11-20.txt:02:43:23: <zzo38> It looks like Conservapedia is not being encyclopedic! Although some of the points might be valid in some cases, they are not correct if you are trying to be unbiased articles about stuff like encyclopedic stuff.
+2011-11-20.txt:02:48:48: <zzo38> Well, Wikipedia should probably cover Jesus Christ as savior of mankind etc, although in the different way than Conservapedia does; Wikipedia should write it like, this is according to Christians religion, and such things, instead of saying it is absolute and that stuff. But Wikipedia should still write about Jesus Christ as savior, just not the way Conservapedia does.
+2011-11-20.txt:02:51:10: <CakeProphet> http://conservapedia.com/Homosexuality
+2011-11-20.txt:02:51:49: <elliott> http://conservapedia.com/Poop
+2011-11-20.txt:02:52:09: <elliott> http://conservapedia.com/Obscenity "Language describing homosexual acts tends, at least in English, to have the greatest emotional impact."
+2011-11-20.txt:02:58:04: <CakeProphet> The founder (known only as "WillH") wanted Liberapedia to parody Conservapedia and advised that: "most articles should take stereotypical liberal views and distort them to the extreme". Most arrivals since then have ignored that, and instead just written about liberal politics with dead seriousness.
+2011-11-20.txt:04:01:08: <zzo38> The Conservapedia page about GNU/Linux mentions that Richard Stallman is atheist. The article about Donald Knuth doesn't mention that Knuth is Christian, and it says he is known as the creator of LaTeX (the article about LaTeX (there is none about TeX) mentions that Leslie Lamport invented LaTeX, not Knuth). I did look at Liberapedia too.
+2011-11-20.txt:04:01:47: <Sgeo> ....Does Conservapedia have a thing against F/OSS?
+2011-11-20.txt:04:06:00: <pikhq_> Also, I'd imagine Conservapedia mostly has an anti-geek bias. I'm surprised there's even an *article* on rms.
+2011-12-12.txt:19:23:37: <Gregor> kallisti: "There has never been any evidence presented that the soul can enter the body at any time later than conception." — Conservapedia
+2011-12-12.txt:19:24:07: <monqy> wow good job conservapedia
+2011-12-27.txt:08:51:23: <HackEgo> 2010-05-06.txt:18:43:36: <Phantom_Hoover> Conservapedia was pretty funny back in the day.
+2012-01-18.txt:06:24:11: <oerjan> kallisti: try conservapedia instead
+2012-02-08.txt:07:40:21: * Sgeo vaguely wonders if Conservapedia has an article on Alan Turing
+2012-02-08.txt:07:44:15: <Sgeo> http://www.conservapedia.com/Alan_Turing
+2012-02-08.txt:07:45:04: <pikhq> Sgeo: Conservapedians are convinced atheism is the ultimate sin.
+2012-02-08.txt:07:46:06: <Sgeo> http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Alan_Turing
+2012-02-08.txt:07:46:22: <Sgeo> " All politics aside, any biographical entry on Alan Turing which doesn't mention his sexual orientation at all is woefully incomplete. Deliberately avoiding the subject for fear of endorsing it serves no purpose except to give readers the impression that Conservapedia is a wiki which puts ideology ahead of being an informative reference tool."
+2012-02-08.txt:08:10:33: * Jafet vaguely wonders why there would be a discussion on the intellectual neutrality of editors on Conservapedia
+2012-02-08.txt:15:12:05: <Gregor> <Sgeo> " All politics aside, any biographical entry on Alan Turing which doesn't mention his sexual orientation at all is woefully incomplete. Deliberately avoiding the subject for fear of endorsing it serves no purpose except to give readers the impression that Conservapedia is a wiki which puts ideology ahead of being an informative reference tool."
+2012-02-08.txt:15:12:25: <Gregor> I'm pretty sure that even Conservapedia's /supporters/ recognize it as a wiki which puts ideology ahead of being an informative reference tool ...
+2012-03-19.txt:10:53:26: <elliott> wow, Conservapedia runs PHP via CGI
+2012-03-19.txt:10:53:53: <elliott> ais523: http://conservapedia.com/Special:Version
+2012-03-28.txt:02:36:32: <kmc> i'm amused that some religious fundamentalists (e.g. conservapedia) are strongly pro-quantum and anti-relativity
+2012-04-03.txt:01:55:09: <Sgeo> I want to facepalm at Conservapedia
+2012-04-05.txt:20:14:12: * Sgeo vaguely wonders if Conservapedia covers EPR stuff
+2012-04-05.txt:20:16:33: <oerjan> conservapedia considers the european pressurized reactor a sure sign of the Beast.
+2012-04-08.txt:20:43:29: <itidus20> "Phyllis Schlafly's son Andrew became a lawyer and founded the website Conservapedia."
+2012-04-15.txt:16:15:07: <elliott> and 430 is a direct Conservapedia quote, which is totally cheating, but I guess we'll have to live with it
+2012-04-18.txt:05:07:26: <Sgeo> ....did Conservapedia just cite a cult?
+2012-04-18.txt:05:08:56: <Sgeo> http://conservapedia.com/Premarital_sex
+2012-04-18.txt:05:53:59: <kmc> you're reading conservapedia
+2012-04-19.txt:07:08:40: <Sgeo> http://conservapedia.com/RINO
+2012-04-19.txt:07:37:19: <kmc> why are you reading conservapedia
+2012-04-19.txt:11:48:56: <itidus21> `pastelogs conservapedia
+2012-04-19.txt:11:49:33: <itidus21> `pastelogs conservapedia