--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/paste/paste.10068	Sun Apr 14 12:33:02 2013 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+2008-03-09.txt:00:47:11: <ehird> http://impomatic.blogspot.com/
+2008-03-17.txt:20:31:07: <ehird_> AnMaster: http://impomatic.blogspot.com/
+2009-01-21.txt:16:50:30: -!- impomatic has joined #esoteric.
+2009-01-21.txt:16:51:50: <impomatic> I've just implemented RSSB in Redcode and I'm looking for a new project
+2009-01-21.txt:17:01:05: <impomatic> Any suggestions. I'd prefer stack or cell based, minimal instruction set and relative addressing!
+2009-01-21.txt:17:06:46: <impomatic> Someone already did bf in redcode
+2009-01-21.txt:17:08:39: <impomatic> I want one of these for esoteric programming langs http://www.levenez.com/lang/lang.pdf :-)
+2009-01-21.txt:17:11:10: <impomatic> The interpreter will be written in Redcode
+2009-01-21.txt:17:49:11: <MizardX> impomatic: Pick and choose -> http://esoteric.voxelperfect.net/wiki/Language_list
+2009-01-21.txt:17:51:00: <impomatic> Too many to choose from!
+2009-01-21.txt:17:52:37: <ais523> hmm... so who's impomatic, then?
+2009-01-21.txt:17:52:44: <oerjan> impomatic: there's also the random page button
+2009-01-21.txt:17:53:09: <impomatic> For now I've looked through the Hello World implementations for a language I like the look of
+2009-01-21.txt:17:54:09: <impomatic> ais523: new here. I'm a redcode programmer
+2009-01-21.txt:17:56:15: <oerjan> impomatic: if you're interested in redcode might i suggest FuckYourBrane (iirc)?
+2009-01-21.txt:18:00:13: <impomatic> oerjan: thanks, I'll take a look shortly
+2009-01-21.txt:18:29:00: -!- impomatic has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)).
+2009-01-24.txt:22:00:25: -!- impomatic has joined #esoteric.
+2009-01-24.txt:22:03:45: <impomatic> Does anyone know what the smallest Brainfuck hello world is?
+2009-01-24.txt:22:03:52: <ehird> impomatic: yes, iirc egobot generated it
+2009-01-24.txt:22:04:26: <impomatic> The one on the wiki is 143
+2009-01-24.txt:22:04:53: <ehird> impomatic: I could try and grep the logs for egobot's I think it was 113 or sth
+2009-01-24.txt:22:05:38: <impomatic> Ehird: thanks, that would be a big help. Google didn't show up much
+2009-01-24.txt:22:05:54: <impomatic> Is 113 the best? Was that generated by a GA or something?
+2009-01-24.txt:22:06:59: <ehird> impomatic:
+2009-01-24.txt:22:07:32: <impomatic> Thanks :-)
+2009-01-24.txt:22:32:25: <impomatic> My first attempt to write a brainfuck hello world by hand - 122 instructions :-(
+2009-01-24.txt:23:19:03: <impomatic> New brainfuck Hello World = 115. That's 3 instructions shorter
+2009-01-24.txt:23:19:45: <ehird> but impomatic's beaten that
+2009-01-24.txt:23:21:01: <impomatic> I was hoping to reach 88 so my interpretter and Hello World fit in 100 instructions, but I don't think there's any chance
+2009-01-24.txt:23:21:10: <impomatic> +++++++++++[>+++++++>+++++++++>++++>+++>++++++++<<<<<-]>-----.>++.+++++++..+++.>.>-.>-.<<<.+++.------.--------.>>+.
+2009-01-24.txt:23:21:16: <ehird> impomatic: you have a 22 char bf interp?
+2009-01-24.txt:23:21:40: <impomatic> No, 12 instruction interpretter :-)
+2009-01-24.txt:23:22:26: <ehird> impomatic: show this interp! :)
+2009-01-24.txt:23:22:55: <impomatic> And it's not slow.  When it starts execution, it converts all [ and ] to relative jumps
+2009-01-24.txt:23:23:17: <oklopol> impomatic: can you show it?
+2009-01-24.txt:23:23:24: <impomatic> The interpretter is more of a compiler, and it's in redcode
+2009-01-24.txt:23:24:33: <impomatic> Okay, wait!
+2009-01-24.txt:23:26:25: <impomatic> Not so impressive: http://pastebin.ca/1317388
+2009-01-24.txt:23:27:01: <impomatic> When the redcode is compiled, it uses macros to compile brainfuck to redcode
+2009-01-24.txt:23:27:29: <impomatic> There are 12 instructions to fix the [ and ] jump addresses
+2009-01-24.txt:23:27:49: <impomatic> Macros at the top
+2009-01-24.txt:23:28:22: <impomatic> Thanks
+2009-01-24.txt:23:28:24: <ehird> impomatic: how much would it take to add a parser?
+2009-01-24.txt:23:29:22: <impomatic> Not much, but first I need to recompile the redcode interpretter. Haven't got a C compiler on this Windoze machine
+2009-01-24.txt:23:30:16: <impomatic> I will add a parser to read in Brainfuck from a file.
+2009-01-24.txt:23:30:16: <impomatic> And possibly add a table based optimizer
+2009-01-24.txt:23:30:32: <impomatic> Often 2 brainfuck instructions could be reduced to 1 redcode instruction
+2009-01-24.txt:23:40:03: <impomatic> The Hello World from Wikipedia outputs a different string.  No comma, but a newline
+2009-01-25.txt:00:04:17: <impomatic> RSSB is less complex. One instruction and only one operand
+2009-01-25.txt:00:04:24: <ehird> impomatic: link?
+2009-01-25.txt:00:06:20: <impomatic> See the RSSB page I made the other day http://esolangs.org/wiki/RSSB
+2009-01-25.txt:00:07:19: <ehird> impomatic: can't IP/ACC be in memory?
+2009-01-25.txt:00:08:48: <ehird> impomatic: ?
+2009-01-25.txt:00:09:09: <impomatic> ehird: I'm not sure why the spec said both
+2009-01-25.txt:00:09:47: <ehird> impomatic: define below 0
+2009-01-25.txt:00:10:13: <impomatic> below 0: if the subtraction causes a borrow
+2009-01-25.txt:00:10:47: <impomatic> There's a redcode implementation at http://impomatic.blogspot.com
+2009-01-25.txt:00:10:51: <ehird> impomatic: i don't follow
+2009-01-25.txt:00:11:14: <impomatic> Yes
+2009-01-25.txt:00:11:46: <impomatic> Basically if prior to the subtraction, acc > contents of memory location, skip the next instruction
+2009-01-25.txt:00:12:36: <ehird> impomatic: so is there a reason it has to be stored in both?
+2009-01-25.txt:00:12:59: <impomatic> There is an implementation of RSSB by David Tanguay, but I can't find a copy online
+2009-01-25.txt:00:13:11: <ehird> impomatic: ?
+2009-01-25.txt:00:13:23: <impomatic> ehird: I just implemented as per David Tanguay's spec
+2009-01-25.txt:00:15:23: <impomatic> ehird: if it only stores in acc, there's no way to modify memory.  if it only stores in memory, then the only thing you can do with acc is set it to zero
+2009-01-25.txt:00:16:47: <ehird> impomatic:
+2009-01-25.txt:00:23:27: <ehird> impomatic: how do you jump backwards with rssb?
+2009-01-25.txt:00:25:16: <ehird> impomatic: how do you jump backwards with rssb?
+2009-01-25.txt:00:25:32: <impomatic> ehird: subtract something from ip
+2009-01-25.txt:00:27:16: <impomatic> Jump requires 4 lines of RSSB:
+2009-01-25.txt:00:27:16: <impomatic>         rssb   acc       ; set acc to 0
+2009-01-25.txt:00:27:17: <impomatic>         rssb   $+2       ; set acc to loop offset
+2009-01-25.txt:00:27:17: <impomatic>         rssb   ip        ; subtract acc from ip
+2009-01-25.txt:00:27:17: <impomatic>         rssb   $-loop    ; the loop offset
+2009-01-25.txt:00:30:36: <impomatic> Is there a brainfuck variant which adds a stack?
+2009-01-25.txt:00:32:00: <ehird> impomatic: any thoughts?
+2009-01-25.txt:00:33:07: <impomatic> Back tomorrow :-)
+2009-01-25.txt:00:33:11: -!- impomatic has quit ("mov.i #1,1").
+2009-01-25.txt:13:42:45: -!- impomatic has joined #esoteric.
+2009-01-25.txt:13:49:05: <impomatic> 112 Hello, World!   ++++++++++++++[>+++++>+++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>++.>+++.+++++++..+++.>++.>[<-<<+>>>-]<++.<<+.>.+++.------.--------.>+.
+2009-01-25.txt:14:00:42: <ehird> <impomatic> 112 Hello, World!   ++++++++++++++[>+++++>+++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>++.>+++.+++++++..+++.>++.>[<-<<+>>>-]<++.<<+.>.+++.------.--------.>+.
+2009-01-25.txt:14:02:44: <impomatic> Hi Ehird. 1 instruction longer than Wikipedia, but it includes the comma.
+2009-01-25.txt:14:03:00: <impomatic> No
+2009-01-25.txt:14:03:28: <impomatic> Some of the other examples didn't have newline
+2009-01-25.txt:14:41:06: <impomatic> Lol at censoring brainfuck to b****fuck :-)
+2009-01-25.txt:14:48:57: <impomatic> Anyone want to implement Redcode++? http://corewar.co.uk/opcodes.htm
+2009-01-25.txt:15:14:58: -!- impomatic has quit ("http://impomatic.blogspot.com").
+2009-01-25.txt:16:38:12: -!- Metcalf is now known as impomatic.
+2009-01-25.txt:17:01:06: <impomatic> Does anyone know what the smallest bf quine is?
+2009-01-25.txt:17:01:37: <ais523> impomatic: the null string
+2009-01-25.txt:17:06:15: <impomatic> Thanks :-)
+2009-01-25.txt:17:33:06: <impomatic> Revised bf interpreter in Redcode http://impomatic.blogspot.com/2009/01/brainf-interpreter-in-redcode.html
+2009-01-25.txt:17:34:50: <ais523> impomatic: probably not very useful for actual CoreWars games, but it's always nice to have esolang-in-esolang implementations
+2009-01-25.txt:17:37:42: <impomatic> I'd have to check, I think there's a problem with the Redcode interpreter. When it reaches EOF, I think it continues to wait for a character.
+2009-01-25.txt:21:36:02: -!- impomatic has quit ("http://impomatic.blogspot.com").
+2009-01-26.txt:17:12:25: -!- impomatic has joined #esoteric.
+2009-01-26.txt:17:13:26: <impomatic> ^bf ++++++++++++++[>>+>++>+++>++>+++<<[++++<]<-]>>>>>[+++<]>-.>>.+++++++..+++.>>++.<+.<<.>.+++.------.--------.>+.
+2009-01-26.txt:17:13:38: <impomatic> 106 :-)
+2009-01-26.txt:17:16:50: <ehird> impomatic: i think that's longer than it could be
+2009-01-26.txt:17:18:30: <impomatic> Hi Ehird
+2009-01-26.txt:17:21:47: <impomatic> It's 12 bit, I wrote code to read files from it about 15 years ago
+2009-01-26.txt:17:22:06: <impomatic> But I wouldn't be much help.  I only read it, never tried to manipulate it
+2009-01-26.txt:19:55:21: <impomatic> ^bf +++++[>+++[>>+>++>+++>+++>++>+++<<[++++<]<-]<-]>>>---.>>----.>+++..+++.>>-.<++.<<<---.>>.+++.------.<-.>>+.
+2009-01-26.txt:19:57:01: <impomatic> Yeah, shame it's 107 instructions and not <106
+2009-01-26.txt:19:57:16: <impomatic> oklopol: go ahead :-)
+2009-01-26.txt:19:57:42: <impomatic> ehird: okay, show me how :-P
+2009-01-26.txt:19:59:45: <impomatic> I've seen "Hello, World!", "Hello World!
+" and "Hello, world!"
+2009-01-26.txt:20:00:16: <impomatic> I'm working on "Hello, World!" because that's the example someone showed me
+2009-01-26.txt:20:01:28: <impomatic> HI Psygnisfive_
+2009-01-26.txt:20:02:33: <psygnisfive_> impomatic, you new, ey?
+2009-01-26.txt:20:38:17: <impomatic> psygnisfive_: new here, not new to esoteric languages :-)
+2009-01-26.txt:20:44:56: <impomatic> I started playing with esolangs in 1993.
+2009-01-26.txt:20:44:56: <impomatic> Unless Redcode counts :-)
+2009-01-26.txt:20:45:04: <ehird> redcode counts, impomatic
+2009-01-26.txt:20:48:39: <impomatic> 1991 if Redcode counts
+2009-01-26.txt:20:49:25: <impomatic> My modem is apparently not connected?
+2009-01-26.txt:20:49:30: <impomatic> Trying to connect now
+2009-01-26.txt:20:49:31: <ehird> impomatic: i hear you
+2009-01-26.txt:20:50:34: <impomatic> oklopol: You're making me feel old!
+2009-01-26.txt:20:51:21: <impomatic> :-/
+2009-01-26.txt:21:12:18: <impomatic> Anyone here got a programming blog?
+2009-01-26.txt:21:16:31: <impomatic> Judofyr: where? :-)
+2009-01-26.txt:21:22:52: <Judofyr> impomatic: http://judofyr.net
+2009-01-26.txt:22:02:33: -!- impomatic has quit ("http://impomatic.blogspot.com").
+2009-01-27.txt:17:55:58: -!- Metcalf is now known as impomatic.
+2009-01-27.txt:18:17:41: <impomatic> Is there a term for mainstream languages that are rarely used / hear of? E.g. Oberon
+2009-01-27.txt:18:27:43: <MizardX> impomatic: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080118233717AASGNps
+2009-01-27.txt:18:28:27: <impomatic> Hi ehird, and thanks MizardX
+2009-01-27.txt:18:28:54: <ehird> impomatic: I saw a reddit submission of yours earlier today :-)
+2009-01-27.txt:18:30:59: <ehird> impomatic: what's a reverse call? I'm not sure I understand
+2009-01-27.txt:18:31:59: <impomatic> I use impomatic in most places, twitter, stumbleupon, delicious, blogger, reddit
+2009-01-27.txt:18:33:20: <impomatic> Each redcode opcode has two operands (though sometimes they're omited)
+2009-01-27.txt:18:33:20: <impomatic> equ defines a macro
+2009-01-27.txt:18:34:01: <impomatic> so: call equ mov #2-return, <stack ; defines call to be a mov #2-return, <stack
+2009-01-27.txt:18:34:03: <impomatic> :-)
+2009-01-27.txt:18:40:41: <impomatic> There are a couple of solutions to that problem on my blog, but they're both a bit messy
+2009-01-27.txt:18:40:41: <impomatic> There's a redcode specific IRC channel, #corewars on irc.koth.org
+2009-01-27.txt:18:40:41: <impomatic> If the subroutine is above the call in the source listing, the calculated addresses are incorrect
+2009-01-27.txt:18:40:41: <impomatic> Due to wierd behaviour in the macro pre-processor
+2009-01-27.txt:20:54:49: <impomatic> ^bf ++++[>++++<-]>+[>>++>+>+>++<[+++++<]<-]>>>++.>-.-<++++..+++.>>--.+<<<.----->.---<[.>]
+2009-01-27.txt:21:41:03: <ehird> impomatic: no output?
+2009-01-27.txt:21:48:32: <impomatic> No, is the bot broken?
+2009-01-27.txt:21:48:54: <ehird> impomatic: er, three is no bot
+2009-01-27.txt:21:50:29: <impomatic> notepad k
+2009-01-27.txt:21:50:39: <impomatic> Wrong window!
+2009-01-27.txt:21:59:29: * impomatic has an 8 cpu mini-computer :-P
+2009-01-27.txt:21:59:45: <ehird> impomatic: heh
+2009-01-27.txt:21:59:50: <AnMaster> impomatic, hm? What sort?
+2009-01-27.txt:22:00:12: <impomatic> Unfortunately it's from something like 1990, so not very impressive.
+2009-01-27.txt:22:01:01: <impomatic> AnMaster: 19" MVME boards, with a "Cray" logo on the front
+2009-01-27.txt:22:01:08: <AnMaster> impomatic, CRAY!!!!!!!!
+2009-01-27.txt:22:01:16: <AnMaster> impomatic, picture?
+2009-01-27.txt:22:01:24: <AnMaster> impomatic, also what is 19" in metric?
+2009-01-27.txt:22:02:16: <ehird> impomatic: does it run an infinite loop in 6 seconds?
+2009-01-27.txt:22:04:17: <impomatic> About 47cm, haven't got a photo - looks like a washing machine without the door. Never tried the infinite loop!
+2009-01-27.txt:22:04:54: <impomatic> Is lovecraft a esolang? That'd be cool :-)
+2009-01-27.txt:22:09:45: <impomatic> I've got one in 84 now!
+2009-01-27.txt:22:13:00: <AnMaster> impomatic, oh?
+2009-01-27.txt:22:15:01: <impomatic> ^bf ++++[>++++<-]>+[>>++>+>+>++<[+++++<]<-]>>>++.>-.<++++..+++.>>--.++<<<.---->.--<[-.>]
+2009-01-27.txt:22:19:42: <impomatic> We're also talking about bf in #corewars on irc.koth.org
+2009-01-27.txt:22:21:43: * ehird tries to work out impomatic's name in #corewars
+2009-01-27.txt:22:22:32: <olsner> it couldn't be just "impomatic"?
+2009-01-27.txt:22:22:46: <ehird> there is no impomatic in there.
+2009-01-27.txt:22:23:07: <impomatic> OoS
+2009-01-27.txt:22:23:47: <impomatic> It's OoS. I already mentioned #esoteric
+2009-01-27.txt:22:26:29: <impomatic> ehird: it was busy before you arrived http://www.koth.org/irc-logs/2009-01-27.txt
+2009-01-27.txt:22:26:50: <impomatic> We're a bit shy around strangers ;-)
+2009-01-27.txt:22:27:43: <ehird> impomatic: if you can get BF hello world in a standard 80-char line I'll be amazed
+2009-01-27.txt:22:29:18: <impomatic> ehird: I don't think I can knock off the last 4 instructions
+2009-01-27.txt:22:29:24: <ehird> impomatic: aw
+2009-01-27.txt:22:37:24: <ehird> impomatic's beaten it by far.
+2009-01-27.txt:22:43:57: <impomatic> Hmmm... sounds a long time
+2009-01-27.txt:22:44:11: <impomatic> It requires 12 . only two of which are next to each other
+2009-01-27.txt:22:44:47: <impomatic> If the 1st . doesn't output a 'h' it can terminate
+2009-01-27.txt:22:44:47: <impomatic> Forget that, . could be in a loop :-/
+2009-01-27.txt:22:48:53: <impomatic> ghostview?
+2009-01-27.txt:23:03:33: <AnMaster> impomatic, yep
+2009-01-27.txt:23:04:45: <impomatic> Does anarchy golf use 0 for EOF?
+2009-01-27.txt:23:05:48: <ehird> impomatic: yes
+2009-01-27.txt:23:09:46: <MizardX> impomatic: Heh. Right after your program has printed out "hell" in "hello world!", exactly 666 operations has been executed. :P
+2009-01-27.txt:23:11:02: <impomatic> Nice, I wish I'd planned that!
+2009-01-27.txt:23:11:18: <impomatic> Is that the 84 instruction version?
+2009-01-28.txt:00:00:14: <impomatic> When does the fungot bf interpreter terminate? E.g. if I put it in an infinite loop printing something?
+2009-01-28.txt:00:00:15: <fungot> impomatic: you could ask him to move two seats from mine. it's just werid that it never returned in the first place
+2009-01-28.txt:00:00:40: <oerjan> impomatic: iirc it's pretty robust
+2009-01-28.txt:00:00:44: <oklopol> impomatic: after $lot instructions?
+2009-01-28.txt:00:01:18: <ehird> impomatic: fungot is written in befunge
+2009-01-28.txt:00:01:21: <oerjan> impomatic: well i think it also stops after a number of characters
+2009-01-28.txt:00:01:28: <ehird> impomatic: http://zem.fi/~fis/fungot.b98.txt
+2009-01-28.txt:00:24:01: -!- impomatic has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)).
+2009-01-28.txt:07:00:26: -!- impomatic has joined #esoteric.
+2009-01-28.txt:09:51:44: <impomatic> Finally I'm in first place on something :-) http://golf.shinh.org/p.rb?google#Brainfuck
+2009-01-28.txt:09:52:03: <ais523> impomatic: ah, I remember anagold
+2009-01-28.txt:15:12:15: <oklopol> ais523: impomatic: ah, I remember anagold <<< lul i did the same typo
+2009-01-28.txt:15:15:18: <impomatic> I think I'm going to implement Underload
+2009-01-29.txt:13:14:11: <impomatic> Corewar will be 25 years old later this year :-)
+2009-01-29.txt:20:11:43: <impomatic> Hmmm...
+2009-01-29.txt:20:13:09: <impomatic> Borland C++ Builder 5.0's license doesn't allow the user freedom of use for compiled files :-(
+2009-01-29.txt:20:15:18: <bsmntbombdood> impomatic: use a real compiler?
+2009-01-29.txt:20:52:45: <impomatic> Okay, I give up with C++ Builder.  Is GCC a big download?
+2009-01-29.txt:20:53:21: <impomatic> Binary
+2009-01-29.txt:20:54:53: <impomatic> I only want to compile one thing, then I'll probably never use it again
+2009-01-29.txt:20:54:53: <impomatic> I don't like C
+2009-01-29.txt:20:54:53: <impomatic> Yes
+2009-01-29.txt:20:57:02: <Deewiant> impomatic: but VC++ might be easier to get working
+2009-01-29.txt:20:57:45: <impomatic> Thanks, I'll download next month :-)
+2009-01-29.txt:20:57:45: <impomatic> My bandwidth limit is close!
+2009-01-29.txt:22:25:05: <impomatic> Hi yoR :-)
+2009-01-29.txt:22:41:19: <impomatic> I made another bf interpreter last night in 8086 asm
+2009-01-29.txt:22:44:48: <impomatic> No, not enough time!
+2009-01-29.txt:23:56:53: <impomatic> I'm 34, so I guess I'm with the few really old people!
+2009-01-30.txt:00:04:42: <impomatic> ^bf +++++++[>+++++++<-]>++.+.
+2009-01-30.txt:09:38:04: -!- impomatic has quit ("programming @ http://tr.im/xey").
+2009-01-30.txt:18:49:37: -!- impomatic has joined #esoteric.
+2009-01-30.txt:18:59:50: <impomatic> I've created a new page for Redcode on the Esoteric Languages Wiki, http://tr.im/dpty
+2009-01-30.txt:19:06:13: <impomatic> No :-(
+2009-01-30.txt:19:06:43: <impomatic> It was on the language list, but no page. I've added some basics to begin with
+2009-01-30.txt:19:06:48: <lament> impomatic: you play corewars?
+2009-01-30.txt:19:07:23: <impomatic> Yes, and also do some programming in redcode
+2009-01-30.txt:19:08:19: <lament> impomatic: is it fun? Has the state-of-the-art progressed since the 80s?
+2009-01-30.txt:19:08:35: <impomatic> About that :-)
+2009-01-30.txt:19:09:37: <impomatic> It's fun, but slow at the moment. There's a history at http://corewar.co.uk/history.htm which give brief details of what's happened each year
+2009-01-30.txt:19:10:39: <impomatic> Basically, there's been a new standard, there's now various online tournaments with instantaneous results, and new techniques keep getting invented.
+2009-01-30.txt:19:11:49: <impomatic> There are several irregular newsletters too, http://corewar.co.uk/journals.htm
+2009-01-30.txt:19:33:27: <Deewiant> impomatic: a new standard? When was that?
+2009-01-30.txt:20:16:06: <impomatic> Deewiant cw standards = 1986, 1988 and 1994
+2009-01-30.txt:20:19:43: <Deewiant> impomatic: yep, I was hoping for something after 94 :-)
+2009-01-30.txt:20:20:41: <impomatic> No need for a new standard
+2009-01-30.txt:20:20:46: <impomatic> Although opcodes for character input / output have been added
+2009-01-30.txt:22:24:22: <impomatic> Has anyone got any really old corewar stuff?  I'm building a big online archive
+2009-01-30.txt:22:25:06: <impomatic> Unfortunately there's lots of stuff that used to be online, but has now disappeared.
+2009-01-30.txt:22:25:29: <impomatic> The same seems to go for some other Esolang stuff :-(
+2009-01-30.txt:22:26:56: <Deewiant> impomatic: I might, somewhere, but I think it's all from corewar.co.uk anyway
+2009-01-30.txt:22:26:58: <impomatic> Thanks, looking
+2009-01-30.txt:22:27:05: <ehird> Deewiant: isn't that impomatic's site? :P
+2009-01-30.txt:22:27:21: <impomatic> Deewiant, I should have all of the corewar.co.uk stuff! :-)
+2009-01-30.txt:22:27:31: <Deewiant> impomatic: :-)
+2009-01-30.txt:22:30:34: <impomatic> The Minus webpages have disappeared, hopefully I'll find them in the archive
+2009-01-30.txt:22:30:49: <impomatic> There was something else too which I noticed had gone.  Not ever in the internet archive :-(
+2009-01-30.txt:22:46:25: <impomatic> Anyone heard of TWINC, TWo INstruction Computer? :-)
+2009-01-30.txt:23:08:02: * impomatic checks he's still in #esolang
+2009-01-30.txt:23:08:52: <oerjan> impomatic: everything is on topic here except esolangs.  the # is logical negation.
+2009-01-30.txt:23:09:23: <impomatic> Hmmm... let me try something :-(
+2009-01-30.txt:23:09:29: <impomatic> ehird: am I here now?
+2009-01-30.txt:23:11:39: <impomatic> While we're talking comics, http://corewar.co.uk/cwcomics.txt
+2009-01-30.txt:23:14:06: <oklopol> so, impomatic, i hate you; and now let me elaborate on that, it's less insulting than you think.
+2009-01-30.txt:23:15:19: <impomatic> Yay :-)
+2009-01-30.txt:23:15:34: <impomatic> I think they're both going to be around a while, no hurry
+2009-01-30.txt:23:16:04: <impomatic> If they'd add redcode to code golfing, you could kill two birds with one stone
+2009-01-30.txt:23:42:40: -!- impomatic has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)).
+2009-01-31.txt:13:51:26: -!- impomatic has joined #esoteric.
+2009-01-31.txt:13:56:11: <impomatic> Has befunge.org moved, or just disappeared?
+2009-01-31.txt:13:57:53: <impomatic> Sorry :-/
+2009-01-31.txt:15:40:57: <impomatic> Hi X-Scale :-)
+2009-01-31.txt:15:42:26: <impomatic> X-Scale: I think I've seen you in #corewars ;-)
+2009-01-31.txt:16:06:03: <X-Scale> Hello there, impomatic & ehird :)
+2009-01-31.txt:18:59:49: -!- impomatic has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)).
+2009-02-01.txt:07:02:46: -!- impomatic has joined #esoteric.
+2009-02-01.txt:11:32:17: <impomatic> Why are <> and [] reserved in Underload?
+2009-02-01.txt:12:10:26: -!- impomatic has quit ("mov.i #1,1").
+2009-02-01.txt:13:54:42: <ehird> <impomatic> Why are <> and [] reserved in Underload?
+2009-02-04.txt:07:44:10: -!- impomatic has joined #esoteric.
+2009-02-04.txt:10:07:32: <impomatic> I've implemented an interpreter for Underload in Redcode, http://tr.im/eil7
+2009-02-04.txt:11:22:27: <whoppix> impomatic, what would be the default policy for an underload interpreter if the execution pointer encounters any letter that is not valid underload?
+2009-02-04.txt:12:07:53: <impomatic> whoppix: fizzie: the program terminates when it reaches the invalid input
+2009-02-04.txt:12:08:34: <impomatic> And it expects the program to be valid. It will do a swap on an empty stack
+2009-02-04.txt:12:09:05: <impomatic> (comment)!
+2009-02-04.txt:12:10:20: <impomatic> I'm looking for another language to implement
+2009-02-04.txt:12:10:30: <impomatic> Maybe Aura
+2009-02-04.txt:17:25:26: -!- impomatic has quit ("infinite loops @ http://tr.im/33xe :-)").
+2009-02-04.txt:17:47:22: -!- impomatic has joined #esoteric.
+2009-02-04.txt:17:56:00: <impomatic> Hmmm... there's probably more Haskell on reddit than any other language!
+2009-02-04.txt:17:57:10: <ehird> impomatic: Indeed, it's quite popular over there. Was even more so in 2007 - early 2008 before the enterprisey folks arrived.
+2009-02-04.txt:18:07:36: <impomatic> AnMaster: about 2 inches of snow, I live half way up
+2009-02-04.txt:18:08:08: <AnMaster> impomatic, 2 inches in SI units?
+2009-02-04.txt:18:09:01: <AnMaster> impomatic, well that isn't very much
+2009-02-04.txt:18:11:04: <impomatic> It doesn't need much to bring the U.K. to a standstill :-)
+2009-02-04.txt:18:12:50: <impomatic> The news reports have been talking about the big freeze and arctic conditions.  In reality it's just been a few cm of snow and -2C overnight
+2009-02-04.txt:18:16:03: <AnMaster> impomatic, -2C? Bah, that is warm
+2009-02-04.txt:18:19:40: <impomatic> Hmmm... it's 25.4C indoors at the moment :-)
+2009-02-04.txt:18:39:38: <impomatic> Since we're talking about osdev, how do I get two processes to agree on a channel to communicate by?
+2009-02-04.txt:18:39:53: <AnMaster> impomatic, that is very vague
+2009-02-04.txt:18:40:35: * AnMaster waits for a clarification of what impomatic meant. IPC? TCP? shared memory?
+2009-02-04.txt:18:41:58: <impomatic> I can implement the IPC primatives easily. But how would program A and B that need to communicate with each other allocate a channel?
+2009-02-04.txt:18:43:40: <AnMaster> impomatic, well, you could implement some sort of named pipe facility for example to allow different user space processes to open the same named pipe
+2009-02-04.txt:18:44:01: <ehird> impomatic: do something like:
+2009-02-04.txt:18:47:39: <impomatic> Hmmm...
+2009-02-04.txt:18:48:10: <AnMaster> impomatic, take a look at the posix apis for shared memory and such maybe?
+2009-02-04.txt:18:52:45: <impomatic> Okay, I'll google them
+2009-02-04.txt:18:54:23: <AnMaster> impomatic, what "them"?
+2009-02-04.txt:18:55:45: <impomatic> Posix apis
+2009-02-04.txt:19:23:09: <impomatic> I have a simple OS - bootloader, kernel with memory management, scheduling, etc written in asm
+2009-02-04.txt:19:43:30: -!- impomatic has quit ("cw for newbies http://tr.im/xep :-)").
+2009-02-04.txt:21:44:09: -!- impomatic has joined #esoteric.
+2009-02-04.txt:21:44:50: <impomatic> Has anyone got the spec for Hanoi Love?
+2009-02-04.txt:21:45:27: <impomatic> The link on the wiki is broken, nothing in the web archive :-/
+2009-02-04.txt:23:10:26: -!- impomatic has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)).
+2009-02-05.txt:06:47:49: -!- impomatic has joined #esoteric.