Mercurial > repo
changeset 21:ea233ab8df49
<fizzie> pastelog brickbrain
author | HackBot |
---|---|
date | Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:38:23 +0000 |
parents | 1215cc9c1bd9 |
children | d8a113b0f2f8 |
files | paste/paste.23910 |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/paste/paste.23910 Sat Feb 25 12:38:23 2012 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +2011-01-28.txt:21:06:45: <Phantom_Hoover> ais523, PREPARE FOR BRICKBRAINNESS +2011-01-28.txt:23:45:48: <Phantom_Hoover> I want to brickbrain the person who posted it. +2011-05-16.txt:13:00:13: * Phantom_Hoover brickbrains oerjan, moves onto ais523 before realising he is out of bricks. +2011-05-16.txt:21:55:28: * Phantom__Hoover brickbrains Sgeo. +2011-06-21.txt:19:27:16: <Phantom_Hoover> Unfortunately I will have to brickbrain you before you can go any further. This is good, keep it up! +2011-07-11.txt:13:38:43: <Phantom_Hoover> Well, you seem moderately nice, so I won't brickbrain you. +2011-07-11.txt:13:57:58: <Phantom_Hoover> Taneb, yes, except brickbraining those people is pointless because it would just make their brain slightly harder. +2011-08-05.txt:23:53:08: * Phantom_Hoover brickbrain Lymee +2011-11-07.txt:19:51:52: <Phantom_Hoover> olsner, readying it for some brickbrainin'. +2011-11-09.txt:06:33:57: <elliott> And delegate the brickbraining to me. +2011-11-20.txt:14:49:20: <elliott_> I don't think it's ever been proven that the brickbraining procedure is fatal. +2011-11-20.txt:14:52:02: <Taneb|Hovercraft> Hoover's conjecture: the brickbraining is not fatal +2011-12-11.txt:18:33:25: <Phantom__Hoover> Ngevd, THAT SOUNDS LIKE BRICKBRAINING TALK +2012-01-05.txt:10:58:32: <elliott> He's going to brickbrain himself +2012-02-25.txt:11:28:07: <Taneb> Good luck being brickbrained by Phantom Hoover +2012-02-25.txt:12:00:52: <mRoman> brickbrained? +2012-02-25.txt:12:37:58: <fizzie> `pastelog brickbrain