# HG changeset patch # User HackBot # Date 1347762604 0 # Node ID c5a529fbc8b9bff4261c3799d7416260fab58bdf # Parent 0a6a039152269434cda3b1bf8259780979308ec4 pastelogs $ which ghc +2006-08-02.txt:22:15:41: /usr/bin/ghc +2007-10-27.txt:22:41:53: Can't other Haskells run/compile GHC? +2009-02-16.txt:23:15:31: "Eighch" is spelled "eighch" +2009-05-15.txt:21:58:20: !sh ghc +2009-05-21.txt:05:19:53: ghci is GHC /interactive/, not GHC /interpreter/ :P +2009-05-21.txt:11:04:52: ghci is GHC /interactive/, not GHC /interpreter/ :P +2009-06-15.txt:17:33:48: Oh yeah, I never got Haskell working, because GHC was unfriendly. +2009-06-23.txt:03:17:02: It was easier than calling ghc and then running the resultant binary manually, although that also worked. +2009-06-23.txt:03:26:17: (The original author of hugs endorses GHC in his Haskell class. True story, I was there, lawl :P ) +2009-06-26.txt:01:03:59: `run ghc 2>&1 +2010-08-04.txt:18:15:39: Uh, pretty sure !haskell IS ghci +2010-10-18.txt:05:51:22: Is Codu frozen upgrading GHC? :P +2010-10-29.txt:02:39:43: elliott: I haven't but I have lots and lots of other things to do. Also, GHC wasn't DEVELOPED at MSR, it was folded into MSR. +2010-12-08.txt:00:14:29: elliott: The loader can't verify the correctness of a compiled GHC binary. +2010-12-24.txt:00:36:55: I wouldn't be surprised if GHC can't even make static executables (without some hacking) +2011-08-19.txt:13:38:59: `fetch http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/6.2.2/ghc-6.2.2-i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2 +2011-08-19.txt:13:39:23: elliott_: I just typed "GHC binaries" into Google 8-D +2011-08-19.txt:13:44:06: Maybe I'll just install GHC :P +2011-08-19.txt:13:48:59: # find . -name ghc | xargs file +2011-08-19.txt:13:49:00: ./ghc: directory +2011-08-19.txt:13:49:00: ./driver/ghc: directory +2011-08-19.txt:13:49:00: ./compiler/stage2/doc/html/ghc: directory +2011-08-19.txt:13:57:21: `ghc +2011-08-19.txt:13:57:44: `which ghc +2011-08-23.txt:16:07:37: Whoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah compiled GHC programs don't depend on a libghc.lol +2011-08-23.txt:16:09:25: Deewiant: Well, they're not /fully/ statically linked, just the GHC parts are. +2011-08-23.txt:16:10:08: I can't find a ghc -no-really-static-not-just-libghc-static +2011-08-23.txt:16:13:49: ghc --make -O2 -optl-static -optl-lpthread tantrum.hs +2011-08-23.txt:17:57:32: 16:07:37: Whoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah compiled GHC programs don't depend on a libghc.lol +2011-08-23.txt:17:57:51: 16:09:25: Deewiant: Well, they're not /fully/ statically linked, just the GHC parts are. +2011-08-23.txt:17:58:12: 16:13:49: ghc --make -O2 -optl-static -optl-lpthread tantrum.hs +2011-09-13.txt:22:11:43: `addquote elliott: GHC bug? Come on, it's the parentheses. The more parentheses you add, the closer it is to LISP, and therefore the more dynamically-typed. +2011-09-15.txt:04:03:42: Wasn't I only asked to so that you could go on a ridiculous foolhearted quest to build GHC? +2011-10-14.txt:03:26:09: `ghc +2011-11-25.txt:00:55:45: elliott: runghc replaced. +2011-11-25.txt:00:56:37: *lambdabot* elliott said 21h 44m 48s ago: Replace HackEgo's runghc with http://sprunge.us/AYIK, thx (avoids really expensive optimisation, useless temporary file) +2011-12-17.txt:00:40:29: !sh ls /opt/ghc +2011-12-17.txt:00:41:11: !sh ls /opt/ghc +2011-12-25.txt:16:40:53: !sh ls /opt/ghc +2011-12-25.txt:16:41:08: !sh ls /opt/ghc/bin +2011-12-25.txt:16:41:39: !sh ls /opt/ghc | fmt +2011-12-25.txt:16:41:43: !sh ls /opt/ghc/bin | fmt +2011-12-25.txt:16:44:25: !sh ls /opt/ghc +2011-12-25.txt:16:44:28: !sh ls /opt/ghc/bin +2012-08-29.txt:00:20:41: I removed ghc because it was friggin' enormous +2012-08-29.txt:00:25:42: However, I had ghc installed to /opt/ghc +2012-08-29.txt:00:25:49: So, y'know, rm -rf /opt/ghc +2012-09-16.txt:02:29:13: `pastelogs `pastelogs