# HG changeset patch
# User HackBot
# Date 1331900174 0
# Node ID c1c9ed8a02741e18898334a35ccf64b393957b58
# Parent  b9e237811a298b211f1a5a4ed749ef838812ff35
<oerjan> pastelogs oerjan>.*[?]$

diff -r b9e237811a29 -r c1c9ed8a0274 paste/paste.28391
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/paste/paste.28391	Fri Mar 16 12:16:14 2012 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,301 @@
+2006-06-13.txt:00:43:46: <oerjan> is that a bug?
+2006-09-28.txt:20:01:45: <oerjan> boblol: was that what your 196 message the other day was about?
+2006-10-01.txt:20:21:49: <oerjan> thoughts? on nonlogic?
+2006-10-01.txt:20:30:05: <oerjan> hm, am i right if i guess that a BFM program can only access the named variables, and no other locations?
+2006-10-01.txt:20:36:26: <oerjan> but will arbitrary inline code not wreak havoc with variable positioning?
+2006-10-01.txt:20:56:56: <oerjan> or, left, right and at just tell the macro processor the effect of inlined code, right?
+2006-10-01.txt:21:02:57: <oerjan> hm, there is a problem here, what about left and right inside while?
+2006-10-01.txt:21:17:08: <oerjan> have you tested it?
+2006-10-01.txt:21:18:00: <oerjan> how can it be, when proc right clearly contains incr ::location?
+2006-10-01.txt:21:25:57: <oerjan> yes.but why do some procs have _ at the begining of their name?
+2006-10-01.txt:21:32:08: <oerjan> what does the array command do?
+2006-10-02.txt:20:55:20: <oerjan> who was that lambda?
+2006-10-02.txt:21:40:47: <oerjan> obviously?
+2006-10-03.txt:19:04:21: <oerjan> what bug?
+2006-10-03.txt:19:13:42: <oerjan> if twenty -> twnt, then twentyone -> ?
+2006-10-03.txt:19:23:06: <oerjan> btw, is there any difference between ghost and recover?
+2006-10-03.txt:19:36:01: <oerjan> BFM?
+2006-10-05.txt:01:19:06: <oerjan> hm, global C arrays are initialized to zero, aren't they?
+2006-10-05.txt:02:18:48: <oerjan> the program stopped. probably not zeros to the left of the array memory?
+2006-10-05.txt:12:12:58: <oerjan> oh?
+2006-10-05.txt:12:14:31: <oerjan> are you using the interpreter referenced from the wiki?
+2006-10-05.txt:12:51:21: <oerjan> simonRC: i thought maybe that's where the golf started?
+2006-10-05.txt:13:24:18: <oerjan> oh. but your nick is hungarian right?
+2006-10-05.txt:13:33:10: <oerjan> could someone confirm whether global C arrays are zero initialized?
+2006-10-05.txt:20:07:39: <oerjan> can we see the winning solution?
+2006-10-05.txt:23:18:47: <oerjan> what's wrong with wc?
+2006-10-05.txt:23:19:05: <oerjan> ah, not too good on punctuation maybe?
+2006-10-05.txt:23:28:30: <oerjan> hm. anyone got below 38 without wrapping?
+2006-10-05.txt:23:38:35: <oerjan> pikhq: did you use any computer search to get the offsets for the first loop?
+2006-10-07.txt:00:38:28: <oerjan> Huh?
+2006-10-07.txt:01:44:24: <oerjan> why what?
+2006-10-07.txt:01:46:11: <oerjan> or where you thinking of something more important?
+2006-10-08.txt:13:38:02: <oerjan> ahem. in non-wrapping brainfuck?
+2006-10-08.txt:14:46:18: <oerjan> is it out of process space?
+2006-10-08.txt:21:33:24: <oerjan> pastebin?
+2006-10-08.txt:21:39:10: <oerjan> hm... have all the included files been tested?
+2006-10-08.txt:21:42:36: <oerjan> um, what direction does copy x y z copy? and which is the temporary?
+2006-10-08.txt:21:54:30: <oerjan> does booland preserve its arguments?
+2006-10-09.txt:00:21:52: <oerjan> hm, do you consider it necessary to zero out temp variables that aren't used?
+2006-10-09.txt:01:37:49: <oerjan> did you get the booland arguments in the right order?
+2006-10-09.txt:01:38:55: <oerjan> so the second argument is the result?
+2006-10-09.txt:02:02:18: <oerjan> Did subvar also previously take its result in the first argument?
+2006-10-09.txt:02:13:35: <oerjan> is mod working?
+2006-10-09.txt:02:18:30: <oerjan> are the correct a1, a2, a3 calculated?
+2006-10-09.txt:02:53:52: <oerjan> something wrong?
+2006-10-09.txt:02:55:45: <oerjan> is this the mod macro that seemed to work before?
+2006-10-09.txt:02:56:37: <oerjan> the one i suggested?
+2006-10-09.txt:03:09:16: <oerjan> and are you using the newest stdlib?
+2006-10-09.txt:03:13:18: <oerjan> ?
+2006-10-09.txt:03:13:52: <oerjan> you mean there is something wrong with divvar from the start?
+2006-10-09.txt:03:17:31: <oerjan> is the new input/output/temp separation working properly?
+2006-10-09.txt:03:21:46: <oerjan> is it working anyhow?
+2006-10-09.txt:03:50:32: <oerjan> heh. if you remove all instances of [-] from the output, what is its length then?
+2006-10-09.txt:13:53:31: <oerjan> what?
+2006-10-09.txt:13:56:38: <oerjan> the positioning trap again?
+2006-10-09.txt:14:08:06: <oerjan> how does the redundancy check work inside while loops?
+2006-10-09.txt:14:12:50: <oerjan> and at the beginning does it empty the list?
+2006-10-10.txt:23:12:34: <oerjan> not gzip?
+2006-10-11.txt:02:22:52: <oerjan> what was that about?
+2006-10-12.txt:23:20:02: <oerjan> hm. it seems to me that strange things can happen if you put the @ procedure anywhere but at the top of your program. shouldn't there be a check for this?
+2006-10-13.txt:23:30:14: <oerjan> what about it?
+2006-10-14.txt:22:04:00: <oerjan> what, is there something wrong with Haskell now?
+2006-10-14.txt:22:07:17: <oerjan> i think this is not going very well. is there not some esoteric programming language based on silence we could use for assistance?
+2006-10-14.txt:22:08:45: <oerjan> what is metric time?
+2006-10-15.txt:01:22:25: <oerjan> what does it compile to? C?
+2006-10-15.txt:01:22:35: <oerjan> asm?
+2006-10-17.txt:03:19:34: <oerjan> perhaps. for the time being, have you tried compiling basm.b with basm.b?
+2006-10-17.txt:03:51:29: <oerjan> are you storing the length of >>>>>>>> runs in single cells?
+2006-10-17.txt:04:01:28: <oerjan> how big is it?
+2006-10-17.txt:04:34:01: <oerjan> we all are insane here. what's the matter?
+2006-10-19.txt:06:01:15: <oerjan> if you are clearing the cells anyways, isn't ignoring a 0x00 just to use [.[-]] instead of .?
+2006-10-20.txt:17:45:41: <oerjan> question: for the 1-cell case, do you still want the macro to take a second argument for uniformity?
+2006-10-20.txt:18:48:48: <oerjan> aha. is there a new tarball?
+2006-10-21.txt:20:28:17: <oerjan> what, no Unicode?
+2006-10-21.txt:20:32:33: <oerjan> statements are one thing, but what about expressions?
+2006-10-21.txt:20:33:32: <oerjan> surely you don't want to restrict this language to only imperative features?
+2006-10-21.txt:20:42:26: <oerjan> what do you mean, _or_?
+2006-10-22.txt:15:51:28: <oerjan> so that we don't get to close the holes by just doing simple tricks?
+2006-10-22.txt:16:15:05: <oerjan> and still this is the largest part of the program?
+2006-10-22.txt:16:23:47: <oerjan> these out* macros, are they that way to avoid long stretches of > and < ?
+2006-10-22.txt:16:33:19: <oerjan> that part setting sc looks suspiciously like cons57 followed by add 2. why not use cons59 instead?
+2006-10-22.txt:16:41:39: <oerjan> what's inefficient about it?
+2006-10-22.txt:17:21:16: <oerjan> wow, it apparently was a widespread problem then. what was the size before?
+2006-10-23.txt:00:23:04: <oerjan> what do you mean by nonstandard?
+2006-10-23.txt:00:35:07: <oerjan> have you tried?
+2006-10-23.txt:23:03:52: <oerjan> no. what is COBOL's ALTER?
+2006-10-23.txt:23:06:15: <oerjan> worse than ALGOL's for?
+2006-10-24.txt:00:15:20: <oerjan> in the sense of CASVS: the order of statements in different branches don't matter?
+2006-10-24.txt:00:24:41: <oerjan> what?
+2006-10-24.txt:00:36:43: <oerjan> what is ABCDEF?
+2006-10-24.txt:00:48:24: <oerjan> where?
+2006-10-24.txt:00:55:28: <oerjan> what number is that rule?
+2006-10-24.txt:17:21:51: <oerjan> in general having comments go into the bf code may not be a good idea if the point is to make the result as short as possible. Maybe an alternative command?
+2006-10-24.txt:17:28:32: <oerjan> perhaps rename "comment" to "inline"?
+2006-10-24.txt:17:35:05: <oerjan> has there been any other changes to basm.bfm since then?
+2006-10-25.txt:19:35:43: <oerjan> something that starts to worry me about the source command: am i right that it doesn't check whether a file has been sourced before?
+2006-10-26.txt:21:31:37: <oerjan> you mean like add {x y z} 3?
+2006-10-26.txt:21:46:29: <oerjan> is this some kind of implicit argument iteration for all macros?
+2006-10-26.txt:21:56:43: <oerjan> problems?
+2006-10-26.txt:22:05:17: <oerjan> what is the literal code?
+2006-10-26.txt:22:09:16: <oerjan> might $args happen to be a string rather than a list?
+2006-10-26.txt:22:45:35: <oerjan> and you are sure that there is no bug in LostKng.b itself?
+2006-10-26.txt:22:49:05: <oerjan> right. have you use the new stdcons macros in basm?
+2006-10-28.txt:23:30:00: <oerjan> hmph. no blinkenlights?
+2006-10-29.txt:02:00:57: <oerjan> asztal: does britain change back tonight too?
+2006-10-30.txt:21:31:31: <oerjan> like they did 30 years ago?
+2006-11-02.txt:00:59:45: <oerjan> but if two stacks can emulate a tape, isn't this then essensially a three-stack language?
+2006-11-02.txt:02:30:25: <oerjan> indexed?
+2006-11-02.txt:02:40:22: <oerjan> what about x=not x ?
+2006-11-02.txt:02:41:48: <oerjan> how is there a type error?
+2006-11-02.txt:03:07:04: <oerjan> what kind of hooks are these?
+2006-11-02.txt:03:08:09: <oerjan> ah, this thing i've heard mentioned called aspect oriented programming?
+2006-11-02.txt:04:00:21: <oerjan> !Huh?
+2006-11-02.txt:05:01:53: <oerjan> esoteric?
+2006-11-03.txt:04:23:30: <oerjan> how do you set nonblocking in C?
+2006-11-03.txt:04:27:15: <oerjan> but getc would block anyhow wouldn't it?
+2006-11-03.txt:04:27:44: <oerjan> are you trying to change terminal settings?
+2006-11-03.txt:04:29:06: <oerjan> you succeeded?
+2006-11-03.txt:04:31:23: <oerjan> right. however doesn't that prevent you from detecting real EOF?
+2006-11-03.txt:05:05:03: <oerjan> one thing i worried about - won't that nonblock program write a horrible lot of nuls?
+2006-11-04.txt:01:17:46: <oerjan> what is Erna, apart from a Norwegian party leader?
+2006-11-04.txt:01:27:37: <oerjan> if you say so. you couldn't get gregorR to send me a couple million dollars?
+2006-11-04.txt:21:28:45: <oerjan> perl?
+2006-11-04.txt:22:05:15: <oerjan> there is room for a finger in that?
+2006-11-04.txt:22:43:06: <oerjan> do you use the -w flag?
+2006-11-04.txt:23:02:57: <oerjan> RTG: i note you are writing $x++;$ctr++ if $p[$x]=="["; . you are not wrongly assuming that the if would scope over both statements?
+2006-11-04.txt:23:12:47: <oerjan> do you have an example program and input that goes wrong?
+2006-11-04.txt:23:27:56: <oerjan> what was it, apart from the @p array being strangely empty?
+2006-11-04.txt:23:32:59: <oerjan> does it work when you change to string comparison?
+2006-11-05.txt:00:39:27: <oerjan> or should that be terts?
+2006-11-05.txt:01:00:46: <oerjan> that counts as a bug these days?
+2006-11-06.txt:01:43:24: <oerjan> are you referring to the game of life (in which case you are being silly) or do i need to explain lorentz transformations?
+2006-11-17.txt:21:37:12: <oerjan> you don't mean 1982?
+2006-11-17.txt:21:39:01: <oerjan> did they still use only 28 kilobytes anywhere in 1992?
+2006-11-22.txt:03:11:45: <oerjan> isn't that borschtsch?
+2006-11-23.txt:00:46:56: <oerjan> should or should one not dip one's finger into the water?
+2006-11-25.txt:23:50:11: <oerjan> what is zipping?
+2006-11-25.txt:23:56:24: <oerjan> perhaps python?
+2006-11-26.txt:02:59:55: <oerjan> did we kill EgoBot again?
+2006-12-02.txt:23:43:19: <oerjan> how is optimization smarter?
+2006-12-08.txt:01:19:13: <oerjan> japanese, as translated by a korean into english?
+2006-12-08.txt:03:25:16: <oerjan> -ing as in present participle?
+2006-12-09.txt:01:37:26: <oerjan> eval?
+2006-12-09.txt:01:49:51: <oerjan> you are crazy enough to ask ''us''?
+2006-12-10.txt:20:34:18: <oerjan> Would it be impolite of me to shorten the Deadfish interpreter?
+2006-12-10.txt:20:52:47: <oerjan> But it doesn't discard the rest of the line, does it?
+2006-12-10.txt:21:03:41: <oerjan> Since when?
+2006-12-10.txt:22:45:07: <oerjan> can every FSA be implemented with just while and case (getc()) statements?
+2006-12-10.txt:23:48:09: <oerjan> what kind of language is it you want to translate into by the way?
+2006-12-11.txt:01:12:13: <oerjan> but what is dgf?
+2006-12-11.txt:18:04:21: <SimonRC> 01:05 < oerjan> but what is dgf?
+2006-12-17.txt:20:58:27: <oerjan> on the other hand, since you have to give the length in advance, why not just enlarge the file itself first?
+2006-12-21.txt:00:15:17: <oerjan> what, chemical programming? have you heard of the gamma calculus?
+2006-12-21.txt:01:02:06: <oerjan> have you tried using y combinators for recursion?
+2006-12-21.txt:01:13:20: <oerjan> why do you want to match dude only at the beginning?
+2006-12-21.txt:01:13:44: <oerjan> well then, what is wrong with it?
+2006-12-21.txt:03:15:08: <oerjan> are you sure that is quite right for 0?
+2006-12-21.txt:03:51:28: <oerjan> but what should the acronym stand for?
+2006-12-21.txt:23:07:46: <oerjan> !Huh?
+2006-12-21.txt:23:26:37: <oerjan> because whatever errors you actually put in it probably are f***ing moron errors?
+2006-12-24.txt:01:33:28: <oerjan> the "Hello World"? what's the problem?
+2006-12-24.txt:01:35:52: <oerjan> is the string zero-terminated?
+2006-12-24.txt:01:36:49: <oerjan> at some point you probably load the current character into some cell, right?
+2006-12-24.txt:02:12:32: <oerjan> even?
+2006-12-24.txt:02:13:34: <oerjan> what is?
+2006-12-24.txt:02:17:48: <oerjan> what was the point of the quitp WRITE -1 anyhow?
+2006-12-24.txt:03:10:22: <oerjan> hm... make that char char CODESTART?
+2006-12-24.txt:03:25:16: <oerjan> NULL, READ, WRITE and QUIT?
+2006-12-24.txt:04:32:46: <oerjan> general numbers or up to a limit?
+2006-12-24.txt:05:13:29: <oerjan> what for?
+2006-12-24.txt:05:14:49: <oerjan> are you just making general tools?
+2006-12-24.txt:05:31:28: <oerjan> and how is that a problem?
+2006-12-24.txt:05:33:07: <oerjan> you mean to put it in the function's stack frame?
+2006-12-24.txt:05:36:00: <oerjan> do you see any function calls in that code?
+2006-12-25.txt:12:12:00: <oerjan> photographic memory of telephones?
+2006-12-26.txt:22:53:19: <oerjan> is it even technically possible?
+2006-12-27.txt:20:36:13: <oerjan> c/v?
+2006-12-27.txt:20:47:35: <oerjan> have what?
+2006-12-27.txt:20:51:12: <oerjan> which is?
+2006-12-27.txt:21:00:28: <oerjan> is there any way to pick apart strings?
+2006-12-27.txt:21:07:46: <oerjan> any way to test strings?
+2006-12-27.txt:21:33:31: <oerjan> is there no way to print a string without newline?
+2006-12-27.txt:22:09:04: <oerjan> by recalculating completely for each value?
+2006-12-28.txt:18:42:15: <oerjan> probably not portable, but what about -1>>1?
+2006-12-28.txt:18:45:01: <oerjan> i'm not sure of the definition of >> for negative numbers. is it implementation-dependent whether it preserves the sign bit?
+2006-12-28.txt:21:36:54: <oerjan> to use 11? the function must be on top. otherwise use 02?
+2006-12-28.txt:21:39:02: <oerjan> for that use *? rather than ?
+2006-12-28.txt:21:40:03: <oerjan> so use o.?
+2006-12-28.txt:21:40:27: <oerjan> _or_ use 1? instead of (_o)*?
+2006-12-30.txt:06:51:04: <oerjan> cakeprophet: did you notice my comment that the A class in Glass seems to be broken?
+2006-12-30.txt:07:49:23: <oerjan> what happens in your interpreter if you replace the newline with a space?
+2006-12-30.txt:07:53:59: <oerjan> you mean you solved it?
+2006-12-30.txt:07:55:23: <oerjan> but then why would it get Hello right?
+2006-12-30.txt:08:24:06: <oerjan> got problems?
+2006-12-30.txt:09:02:53: <oerjan> gregorR: seen my comment on the Glass A class bug?
+2006-12-30.txt:09:10:54: <oerjan> do you mean function call?
+2006-12-30.txt:09:15:58: <oerjan> so the tape would contain subroutines?
+2006-12-30.txt:09:17:33: <oerjan> reflective then, if you could access the source code directly?
+2006-12-30.txt:09:37:06: <oerjan> just behind them?
+2006-12-31.txt:20:03:56: <oerjan> but then you couldn't have empty lists as elements of lists?
+2006-12-31.txt:20:16:32: <oerjan> you don't even need the ?
+2007-01-01.txt:14:32:02: <oerjan> could you give a short example that breaks?
+2007-01-01.txt:15:40:35: <oerjan> have you tried replacing ?spam? with a one-character command?
+2007-01-01.txt:15:47:06: <oerjan> do you think it could be a problem that STRQUOTE is a two-element string?
+2007-01-01.txt:15:54:37: <oerjan> those {} could need some pruning. Missing some .suppress'es?
+2007-01-02.txt:02:31:56: <oerjan> isn't that negation on numbers?
+2007-01-02.txt:03:07:15: <oerjan> can a stack contain stack elements?
+2007-01-02.txt:03:10:11: <oerjan> is there a way to get to queues other than the top one?
+2007-01-02.txt:03:10:47: <oerjan> how?
+2007-01-02.txt:03:13:34: <oerjan> is there a way to swap or rotate the top queues?
+2007-01-02.txt:03:16:25: <oerjan> can you use % to delete the topmost queue?
+2007-01-02.txt:03:25:08: <oerjan> what about quack?
+2007-01-02.txt:03:28:57: <oerjan> why?
+2007-01-02.txt:03:29:53: <oerjan> is there a way to simply remove a value?
+2007-01-02.txt:03:39:30: <oerjan> eh, why is Stew.q not being initialized?
+2007-01-02.txt:04:07:29: <oerjan> eh, is recursion the only way to do a loop in Stew?
+2007-01-02.txt:22:05:49: <oerjan> but what is perl > ?
+2007-01-02.txt:22:07:22: <oerjan> darn, has someone made a BF interpreter in COBOL yet?
+2007-01-04.txt:00:36:40: <oerjan> It does not actually null out any links, so eventually you will access an already freed node.  Or was that a rhetorical question?
+2007-01-04.txt:02:05:36: <oerjan> why did it stop after 3 lines but not before?
+2007-01-04.txt:02:11:42: <oerjan> what happened?
+2007-01-04.txt:02:56:20: <oerjan> should i dare?
+2007-01-04.txt:03:08:59: <oerjan> ~cat Is this still working?
+2007-01-04.txt:03:09:57: <oerjan> are you trying to make two lines?
+2007-01-04.txt:23:26:52: <oerjan> Right, so socat/netcat is for wrapping standard I/O?
+2007-01-05.txt:00:26:29: <oerjan> Is there an echo here?
+2007-01-05.txt:02:07:30: <oerjan> what does % do?
+2007-01-05.txt:02:08:51: <oerjan> have you tested it?
+2007-01-05.txt:03:45:47: <oerjan> Why is c and d of the ORK quine split in two? Is there a length limit on strings?
+2007-01-08.txt:21:39:36: <oerjan> third and fourth players?
+2007-01-08.txt:21:42:23: <oerjan> Is this something different from Conway games?
+2007-01-08.txt:21:44:41: <oerjan> Or is it just a different way of looking at symmetric ones?
+2007-01-08.txt:22:59:40: <oerjan> do what?
+2007-01-09.txt:02:04:53: <oerjan> cakeprophet: you are aware of what a chroot _is_, are you?
+2007-01-09.txt:04:02:28: <oerjan> because you, like, like it?
+2007-01-10.txt:09:53:26: <oerjan> ????
+2007-01-10.txt:19:30:06: <oerjan> OK, what did you say you thought the first actual command executed was?
+2007-01-10.txt:20:17:05: <oerjan> inserted, placed, pushed?
+2007-01-10.txt:22:13:04: <oerjan> Which file?
+2007-01-10.txt:23:07:06: <oerjan> How are you assigning it to sys.stdout?
+2007-01-10.txt:23:07:59: <oerjan> well that's the idea, isn't it?
+2007-01-12.txt:00:51:09: <oerjan> Is it possible to redefine the print statement itself?
+2007-01-12.txt:01:40:24: <oerjan> What is wrong with "\[^][]*\[(.*)\][^][]*" ?
+2007-01-12.txt:01:41:30: <oerjan> What is wrong with "[^][]* \[ (.*) \] [^][]*"/v ?
+2007-01-12.txt:01:44:40: <oerjan> OK then: "^ [^][]*? \[ (.*) \] [^][]* $"/x ?
+2007-01-12.txt:02:08:07: <oerjan> do what?
+2007-01-12.txt:02:08:24: <oerjan> What is a quit parser?
+2007-01-12.txt:02:12:07: <oerjan> A list of expressions, some of which are themselves lists of expressions?
+2007-01-12.txt:02:27:40: <oerjan> ?
+2007-01-12.txt:02:28:41: <oerjan> What's the problem?
+2007-01-12.txt:02:29:43: <oerjan> What are you doing at ( and ) ?
+2007-01-12.txt:02:31:03: <oerjan> Paste?
+2007-01-12.txt:02:52:10: <oerjan> This is all well and good, but we knew it already.  I just used a loaded word OK?
+2007-01-12.txt:03:02:23: <oerjan> I guess stringIO doesn't actually construct the string until you call get_value?
+2007-01-12.txt:03:09:19: <oerjan> Why the buff?
+2007-01-12.txt:03:24:34: <oerjan> What does cut off mean?  Can two for loops share an iterator?
+2007-01-12.txt:03:51:51: <oerjan> Does that code actually work with nested parentheses?
+2007-01-12.txt:03:53:24: <oerjan> Does partition include the "("'s in the list?
+2007-01-12.txt:03:54:31: <oerjan> Oh, so never more than one sep?
+2007-01-13.txt:21:42:47: <oerjan> Is it humongous?
+2007-01-13.txt:22:42:51: <oerjan> I forgot a (, what else?
+2007-01-14.txt:00:50:01: <oerjan> mercury? on the haskell wiki?
+2007-01-14.txt:00:53:31: <oerjan> Are we talking astronomy or astrology?
+2007-01-14.txt:01:57:15: <oerjan> Like?
+2007-01-14.txt:01:58:15: <oerjan> What's inefficient about that?
+2007-01-14.txt:03:20:21: <oerjan> You didn't know about that?
+2007-01-14.txt:03:39:26: <oerjan> How so?
+2007-01-15.txt:05:47:40: <oerjan> Has anyone claimed C++ is consistent?
+2007-01-15.txt:06:00:35: <oerjan> Will it work for switch statements?
+2007-01-15.txt:06:40:39: <oerjan> What about pancakes with raw meat in them?
+2007-01-15.txt:07:01:23: <oerjan> Obviously one of them would have a syntax like: Sophia? Sophia. Sophia! Sophia?
+2007-01-15.txt:20:19:42: <oerjan> Apparently daemons can be recursive?
+2007-01-17.txt:07:07:07: <oerjan> Stopped, who?
+2007-01-19.txt:21:50:35: <oerjan> Only increment and decrement? Are you using differentiation implicitly?
+2007-01-22.txt:00:22:02: <oerjan> Eye-popping?
+2007-01-23.txt:00:19:02: <oerjan> cake?
+2007-01-23.txt:01:06:31: <oerjan> Just two?
+2007-01-24.txt:23:50:55: <oerjan> why? aren't "|" and " " the same width?
+2007-01-25.txt:23:14:10: <oerjan> Doesn't D support curses?
+2007-01-25.txt:23:17:19: <oerjan> What happens if one actor enters before another has reached his urinal?
+2007-01-25.txt:23:18:30: <oerjan> Is the "closeness" in the actor's new decision based on his position at the time of the decision?
+2007-01-25.txt:23:19:17: <oerjan> And if there is a maze, does it influence distance calculations?
+2007-01-27.txt:00:12:35: <oerjan> Aren't all esoteric languages discordian by default?
+2007-01-28.txt:23:20:34: <oerjan> Right.  What about (#esoteric|#bsmnt_bot_errors|#baadf00) ?
+2007-01-28.txt:23:28:16: <oerjan> What now?
+2007-01-28.txt:23:55:48: <oerjan> How does this mix with persistence?
+2007-01-29.txt:00:44:40: <oerjan> Maybe the file descriptor is set to non-blocking or something?
+2007-02-05.txt:17:13:51: <oerjan> In a bad shape I take?
+2007-02-06.txt:08:12:59: <oerjan> What happened to the collective attempt to translate that Japanese paper?
+2007-02-08.txt:22:49:18: <oerjan> hm?
+2007-02-08.txt:22:58:14: <oerjan> BTW don't you mean Babbage?
+2007-02-08.txt:23:13:39: <oerjan> What, you haven't seen any of the Unlambda self-interpreters?
+2007-02-08.txt:23:16:35: <oerjan> Huh?
+2007-02-09.txt:10:20:07: <oerjan> bsmntbombdood: awake?
+2007-02-09.txt:22:37:43: <oerjan> bsmntbombdood: What kind of lazy evaluation is it you want to know about?
+2007-02-10.txt:23:53:29: <oerjan> ahem?
+2007-02-11.txt:00:27:28: <oerjan> what what?
+2007-02-11.txt:00:32:32: <oerjan> up to omega*2, isn't it?
+2007-02-11.txt:00:40:06: <oerjan> do you know what a total order is?
+2007-02-11.txt:01:54:44: <oerjan> dextrose?
+[too many lines; stopping]