# HG changeset patch
# User HackBot
# Date 1366902283 0
# Node ID 0eed5e34bab71e4febbe293167748a5bdcc37f63
# Parent  2d1a34286ca529b2b4c2f5e8c6fc92fdea0788d3
<oerjan> pastelogs `olist

diff -r 2d1a34286ca5 -r 0eed5e34bab7 paste/paste.29345
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/paste/paste.29345	Thu Apr 25 15:04:43 2013 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+2013-01-18.txt:17:22:34: <Sgeo_> `olist
+2013-01-30.txt:22:01:41: <oerjan> `olist
+2013-01-30.txt:22:04:25: <elliott> `olist
+2013-01-30.txt:22:05:24: <oerjan> `olist
+2013-01-30.txt:22:06:00: <oerjan> `olist
+2013-02-01.txt:02:49:14: <oerjan> `olist #I don't think shachaf was here when I did this
+2013-02-07.txt:21:32:14: <Sgeo> `olist
+2013-02-12.txt:23:09:57: <Sgeo> `olist
+2013-02-12.txt:23:48:25: <oerjan> <Sgeo> `olist <-- that's not new, i'm pretty sure i did `olist for it before.
+2013-02-12.txt:23:52:04: <oerjan> wait, _both_ i and Sgeo did `olist.
+2013-02-18.txt:19:38:32: <Sgeo> `olist
+2013-02-18.txt:19:40:03: <boily> `olist
+2013-02-20.txt:07:16:27: <Sgeo> `pastelogs `olist
+2013-02-21.txt:07:44:27: <doesthiswork> `olist
+2013-02-21.txt:08:42:52: <oklopol> `olist
+2013-02-21.txt:08:49:00: <doesthiswork> `olist
+2013-02-21.txt:08:49:16: <shachaf> doesthiswork: You should stop running `olist when there aren't actually updates.
+2013-02-21.txt:08:50:19: <Sgeo> `olist is just a fixed list of people
+2013-02-21.txt:08:50:23: <oklopol> i read `olist as `list in shachaf's message
+2013-02-25.txt:12:32:16: <Sgeo_> `olist
+2013-02-25.txt:12:34:35: <oerjan> i thought i saw it because someone here had used `olist
+2013-02-26.txt:22:05:12: <Sgeo_> `olist
+2013-02-27.txt:21:31:54: <Sgeo> `olist
+2013-02-28.txt:05:24:26: <shachaf> For `olisting.
+2013-03-01.txt:01:02:12: <shachaf> `olist
+2013-03-01.txt:01:16:51: <shachaf> `olist (Sorry!)
+2013-03-01.txt:01:19:07: <shachaf> `olist
+2013-03-01.txt:20:53:21: <Sgeo> `olist
+2013-03-02.txt:02:15:42: <oerjan> `olist
+2013-03-02.txt:02:16:15: <shachaf> oerjan: I don't see an update since Sgeo's `olist?
+2013-03-02.txt:02:17:21: <oerjan> after his `olist i found #874, which was new to me then
+2013-03-02.txt:02:17:37: <shachaf> When I saw his `olist I saw 875
+2013-03-02.txt:23:38:46: <Sgeo> `olist
+2013-03-04.txt:02:23:08: <Sgeo> `olist
+2013-03-05.txt:02:49:13: <oerjan> `olist
+2013-03-06.txt:05:17:58: <shachaf> `olist
+2013-03-13.txt:11:04:40: <Sgeo> `olist
+2013-03-22.txt:20:39:48: <shachaf> `olist
+2013-03-22.txt:20:40:01: <shachaf> `olist
+2013-03-22.txt:20:40:16: <shachaf> `olist
+2013-03-30.txt:13:18:52: <Sgeo> `olist
+2013-03-30.txt:22:03:21: <shachaf> `olist
+2013-03-30.txt:22:04:34: <shachaf> Did someone `olist?
+2013-03-30.txt:22:10:24: <FireFly> What does the `olist signify?
+2013-04-08.txt:01:50:31: <shachaf> zzo38: Do you want to be on `olist?
+2013-04-08.txt:01:50:48: <zzo38> What is a `olist?
+2013-04-09.txt:21:17:50: <shachaf> Hmm, on Apr 01 I should've claimed an `olist update and blamed it on oerjan's cache that he couldn't see it.
+2013-04-09.txt:23:24:43: <Sgeo> `olist
+2013-04-09.txt:23:25:17: <Sgeo> Sorry I didn't do `olist about an hour sooner. Was commuting back home
+2013-04-09.txt:23:31:09: <Sgeo> <shachaf> Where's the next `olist?
+2013-04-11.txt:10:25:51: <shachaf> Do you follow `olist?
+2013-04-11.txt:10:25:56: <shachaf> We can put you on `olist.
+2013-04-14.txt:12:49:32: <Taneb> Nonetheless, I suspect `olist may be used properly before `slist is again
+2013-04-14.txt:12:50:04: <shachaf> do you even read `olist
+2013-04-17.txt:03:58:28: <Sgeo> `olist