Mercurial > repo
view paste/paste.20792 @ 9285:8320c9c4620f
<oerjan> learn Umlaut is German for "hum aloud", an important feature of the German language. It is indicated by putting two dots over the vowel of the syllable.
| author | HackBot |
|---|---|
| date | Sat, 15 Oct 2016 00:04:47 +0000 |
| parents | e037173e0012 |
| children |
line wrap: on
line source
2003-01-18.txt:00:57:05: <hcf> yeah 2003-01-18.txt:00:57:09: <lament> He does. He's the channel owner. 2003-01-18.txt:00:58:06: <hcf> you're the successor chanserv says 2003-01-18.txt:00:58:26: <hcf> (that's why i asked you) 2003-01-18.txt:00:58:52: <lament> Yes, because he tends to forget the password :) 2003-01-18.txt:00:59:12: <hcf> and isn't here as much as you 2003-01-18.txt:01:01:40: <hcf> http://www.tunes.org/~nef/logs/esoteric/ 2003-01-18.txt:01:01:55: <hcf> have fun 2003-01-18.txt:01:02:43: <lament> thanks 2003-01-18.txt:06:24:31: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-18.txt:15:31:02: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-19.txt:03:23:31: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-19.txt:06:09:05: <lament> yay, nothing at all. 2003-01-19.txt:15:40:29: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-20.txt:02:15:11: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-20.txt:16:14:10: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-21.txt:09:36:48: <dbc1> nick dbc 2003-01-21.txt:09:53:38: <dbc> * 2003-01-21.txt:09:53:38: <dbc> * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:53:38: <dbc> * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:53:38: <dbc> * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:53:38: <dbc> * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:53:38: <dbc> * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:54:44: <lament> o_O 2003-01-21.txt:09:55:07: <dbc> Oh well. 2003-01-21.txt:09:55:20: <dbc> Just trying to make things a little more interesting. Think it'll work if I do it more slowly? 2003-01-21.txt:09:55:55: <dbc> Well, may as well try. Please don't interrupt. 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:05: <dbc> * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:05: <dbc> * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:05: <dbc> * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:05: <dbc> * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:14: <dbc> * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:14: <dbc> * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:14: <dbc> * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:14: <dbc> * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:22: <dbc> * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:22: <dbc> * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:22: <dbc> * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:22: <dbc> * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:32: <dbc> * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:33: <dbc> * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:33: <dbc> * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:33: <dbc> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:41: <dbc> * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:42: <dbc> * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:42: <dbc> * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:42: <dbc> * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:49: <dbc> * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:49: <dbc> * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:49: <dbc> * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:49: <dbc> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:57: <dbc> * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:57: <dbc> * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:57: <dbc> * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:56:57: <dbc> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:57:05: <dbc> * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:57:05: <dbc> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:57:05: <dbc> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:57:05: <dbc> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2003-01-21.txt:09:57:13: <dbc> 2003-01-21.txt:09:57:30: <dbc> Okay. 2003-01-21.txt:09:57:50: <fizzie> mm'k. 2003-01-21.txt:09:57:50: <lament> yay. 2003-01-21.txt:09:59:01: <fizzie> printed with a befunge prog or something? I recall seeing a sierpinski-triangle-printer once. 2003-01-21.txt:10:09:59: <dbc> That one is NYYRIKKI's brainfuck version. 2003-01-21.txt:10:12:04: <fizzie> ah, re befunge, just wrote an interpreter with forth. so our unofficial befunge-interpreters-in-obsolete-but-non-esoteric-languages project now has forth, fortran-77, algol-60, plus few less interesting ones. maybe should do cobol next. 2003-01-21.txt:10:12:47: <dbc> I've just translated a much less well-known fractal though. Again please don't interrupt...(and sorry for monopolizing the channel...this should be the last...) 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:12: <lament> fizzie: go to #forth and say it's obsolete, i dare you 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:13: <dbc> ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ### ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:13: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:13: <dbc> ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:13: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:15: <dbc> ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ### ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:16: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:16: <dbc> ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:17: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:21: <dbc> ### ## ## ## ## ### ### ## # ## ### ### ## ## ## ## ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:21: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:23: <dbc> ### ## ## ## ## ### ### ### ### ### ## ## ## ## ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:25: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:29: <dbc> ### ## ## ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ## ## ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:32: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:33: <dbc> ## # ## ### ## ## ### ### ## # ## ### ### ## ## ### ## # ## 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:35: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:37: <dbc> ## # ## ### ## ## ### ### ### ### ### ## ## ### ## # ## 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:39: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:41: <dbc> ### ### ### ## ## ## ## ### ## ## ## ## ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:43: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:45: <dbc> ### ### ### ## ## ## ## ## # ## ## ## ## ## ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:47: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:49: <dbc> ### ## # ## ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ## # ## ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:51: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:54: <dbc> ### ### ### ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:55: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:57: <dbc> ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ## # ## ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## 2003-01-21.txt:10:13:59: <dbc> # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:01: <dbc> ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:03: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:05: <dbc> ### ### ### ## # ## ### ### ### ## # ## ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:07: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:09: <dbc> ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:11: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:13: <dbc> ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:15: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:19: <dbc> ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:21: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:23: <dbc> ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### ## # ## ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:25: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:27: <dbc> ### ### ### ## # ## ### ### ### ## # ## ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:29: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:31: <dbc> ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:33: <dbc> # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:35: <dbc> ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## ## # ## ## ## ### ## ## ### ## ## 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:37: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:39: <dbc> ### ### ### ### ## ## ### ## ## ### ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:41: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:43: <dbc> ### ## # ## ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ## # ## ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:45: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:47: <dbc> ### ### ### ## ## ## ## ## # ## ## ## ## ## ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:49: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:51: <dbc> ### ### ### ## ## ## ## ### ## ## ## ## ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:53: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:55: <dbc> ## # ## ### ## ## ### ### ### ### ### ## ## ### ## # ## 2003-01-21.txt:10:14:57: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:05: <dbc> ## # ## ### ## ## ### ### ## # ## ### ### ## ## ### ## # ## 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:07: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:09: <dbc> ### ## ## ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ## ## ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:11: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:13: <dbc> ### ## ## ## ## ### ### ### ### ### ## ## ## ## ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:15: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:17: <dbc> ### ## ## ## ## ### ### ## # ## ### ### ## ## ## ## ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:19: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:21: <dbc> ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:23: <dbc> # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:25: <dbc> ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ### ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:27: <dbc> 2003-01-21.txt:10:15:29: <dbc> Okay. 2003-01-21.txt:10:17:58: <dbc> (Actually that probably needs, at the least, a change of font to look good...) 2003-01-21.txt:10:18:31: <lament> font? 2003-01-21.txt:10:18:37: <lament> you don't know what font i'm using :) 2003-01-21.txt:10:19:14: <dbc> Are you using one as wide as it is high? 2003-01-21.txt:10:19:24: <lament> no. 2003-01-21.txt:10:19:57: <lament> what fractal is that, anyway? 2003-01-21.txt:10:20:02: <dbc> I had suspected not. People don't usually. Still I left the "probably" there as a weasel word. 2003-01-21.txt:10:20:46: <dbc> That's the result of a Fredkin rule cellular automaton (one that sets each cell to the parity of its neighbors)... 2003-01-21.txt:10:21:34: <lament> how's it a fractal? 2003-01-21.txt:10:21:40: <dbc> eight neighbors, starting condition only one cell turned on...this is I think after 32 iterations. 2003-01-21.txt:10:22:19: <lament> hm, there doesn't seem to be a mandelbrot generator in brainfuck 2003-01-21.txt:10:22:22: <lament> i should fix that 2003-01-21.txt:10:23:18: <dbc> Well, it can also be constructed like the koch snowflake etc, by repeatedly replacing a certain pattern of lines with another one... 2003-01-21.txt:10:23:34: <dbc> though the parts come out at different speeds with that method. 2003-01-21.txt:10:32:28: <dbc> Good luck on that project, anyway... 2003-01-21.txt:10:34:04: <lament> it should be easy 2003-01-21.txt:10:34:07: <lament> or maybe not 2003-01-21.txt:10:38:47: <lament> besides, i have a magic brainfuck preprocessor 2003-01-21.txt:10:38:54: <dbc> Oh christ. 2003-01-21.txt:10:40:28: <lament> all i need is a good representation for fractional numbers. 2003-01-21.txt:10:43:58: <lament> hahahahahaa 2003-01-21.txt:10:44:06: <lament> i searched google for 'imaginary numbers' 2003-01-21.txt:10:44:21: <lament> the very first result is some page in the university of toronto 2003-01-21.txt:10:44:27: <lament> 'Do "Imaginary Numbers" Really Exist?' 2003-01-21.txt:10:44:39: <lament> and they give a long answer to that 2003-01-21.txt:10:44:48: <lament> which includes "Imaginary numbers do exist." 2003-01-21.txt:10:45:04: <lament> Jesus christ, it's the leading canadian university 2003-01-21.txt:10:45:12: <lament> And they're saying imaginary numbers exist :\ 2003-01-21.txt:10:46:00: <lament> and they're using an extremely broken argument to prove their 'existance' 2003-01-21.txt:11:00:42: <dbc> I'm not sure the question is even well-defined. 2003-01-21.txt:11:01:29: <lament> I would be terrified to find out numbers actually existed. 2003-01-21.txt:11:01:41: <dbc> Why? They don't have teeth. 2003-01-21.txt:11:01:51: <lament> dbc: only because they don't exist! 2003-01-21.txt:11:01:57: <dbc> :) 2003-01-21.txt:11:02:53: <lament> Stupid fractional numbers. 2003-01-21.txt:11:03:29: <dbc> You can keep them as numerator and denominator, no? 2003-01-21.txt:11:03:31: <lament> They don't exist either, but they sure are stupid. 2003-01-21.txt:11:03:50: <lament> I can, I guess. 2003-01-21.txt:11:04:44: <lament> problematic on 8-bit brainfuck machines. 2003-01-21.txt:11:05:15: <dbc> well, you can keep both numerator and denominator as strings of binary or decimal digits, one per cell. Probably faster anyway. 2003-01-21.txt:11:06:17: <lament> I think I just suck at brainfuck. 2003-01-21.txt:11:07:25: <dbc> Oh. That would be unfortunate. 2003-01-21.txt:11:07:45: <dbc> Does brainfuck exist? 2003-01-21.txt:11:09:15: <lament> no, but it seems to have teeth anyway. 2003-01-21.txt:11:13:36: <dbc> *8)# 2003-01-21.txt:11:13:59: <lament> that looks like a Dr. Seuss character. 2003-01-21.txt:11:14:25: <dbc> Self-portrait. There's another on my web page now. 2003-01-21.txt:11:15:10: <lament> You look like a Dr. Seuss character? Cool 2003-01-21.txt:11:15:39: <dbc> (which is the 22nd google response for "brainfuck") 2003-01-21.txt:11:16:28: <dbc> (must depart) 2003-01-21.txt:11:16:31: <dbc> (see you) 2003-01-21.txt:11:18:08: <lament> goodbye. 2003-01-21.txt:11:23:29: <fizzie> according to googlism, 'brainfuck is not sexy', 'brainfuck is the ultimate sexual experience', 'brainfuck is too obviously evil', 'brainfuck is too obviously evil' and 'brainfuck is now'. 2003-01-21.txt:11:23:51: <lament> googlism? 2003-01-21.txt:11:28:10: <fizzie> googlism.com, which has recently acquired annoying popups. you give it a word or two, and it searches google and returns 'foo is bar'-style sentences. 2003-01-21.txt:11:28:40: <fizzie> according to googlism, I personally am "60 mm in diameter and each weighs over 5 oz" 2003-01-21.txt:11:32:34: <lament> Amazing. 2003-01-21.txt:11:32:36: <lament> "lament is the cheat and a dirty bastard" 2003-01-21.txt:11:33:09: <lament> "lament is that we put undergraduates through three years of lecture" 2003-01-21.txt:11:33:37: <lament> "brainfuck is better than" 2003-01-21.txt:11:33:43: <lament> heh. 2003-01-21.txt:11:58:51: <dbc> Have a look at the responses for "bush". 2003-01-21.txt:11:59:09: <lament> hmm, i can imagine 2003-01-21.txt:11:59:28: <dbc> bush is engaged in feverish diplomacy to stop an india 2003-01-21.txt:11:59:40: <dbc> bush is glad 2003-01-21.txt:12:00:11: <lament> I like how the first 4 responses are inflammatory. 2003-01-21.txt:12:00:49: <dbc> bush is the 2003-01-21.txt:12:01:08: <lament> "bush is also a member of the illuminist" 2003-01-21.txt:12:01:22: <lament> "bush is winning god still blesses america 2003-01-21.txt:12:01:22: <lament> " 2003-01-21.txt:12:01:44: <lament> "bush is doomed to fail if he doesn't cut off financing of terrorists" 2003-01-21.txt:12:02:53: <dbc> I like the ones that aren't complete sentences best :/ 2003-01-21.txt:12:06:10: <dbc> "googlism is" 2003-01-21.txt:12:06:19: <dbc> "googlism is working now" 2003-01-21.txt:12:06:24: <dbc> (that's the complete list) 2003-01-21.txt:12:06:27: <lament> heh. 2003-01-21.txt:13:46:08: <Taaus> I'm negative, apparently... :o 2003-01-21.txt:13:46:18: <Taaus> 'taus is less than 0' 2003-01-21.txt:13:46:20: <lament> yes you are! 2003-01-21.txt:13:46:56: <Taaus> 'taus is my favorite actress and singer' o_O 2003-01-21.txt:13:48:55: <lament> O_o 2003-01-21.txt:13:49:37: <lament> 'esoteric cheese' sounds better than 'esoteric programming'. 2003-01-21.txt:16:19:06: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-21.txt:21:25:38: <exarkun> This is the boringest channel evar 2003-01-21.txt:22:43:02: <dbc> I've seen worse. 2003-01-22.txt:06:35:55: <lament> wb clog! 2003-01-22.txt:15:28:37: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-22.txt:19:58:21: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-23.txt:05:41:13: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-23.txt:15:23:12: <lament> http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esoteric_programming_language 2003-01-23.txt:15:41:10: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-23.txt:19:31:08: <andreou> Hello, world! 2003-01-23.txt:19:34:24: <andreou> Check 2003-01-23.txt:19:34:35: <andreou> Yey! The logs are RealTime! 2003-01-23.txt:20:51:48: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-24.txt:00:47:15: -!- lament has quit ("<Liam> cocks || <Liam> gigantic cocks || <Liam> slapping me in the face"). 2003-01-24.txt:13:22:41: <dbc1> There should be a function "escalate" that takes one argument and returns a brawl *8)# 2003-01-24.txt:13:25:34: <lament> hmm 2003-01-24.txt:13:26:07: <lament> Are brawls arguments? :) 2003-01-24.txt:13:26:51: <lament> It would makes sense, sorta. And brawls can escalate. 2003-01-24.txt:13:27:12: <lament> A few more helper functions, and you could do brawl arithmetic. 2003-01-24.txt:16:09:26: <dbc1> *8)# 2003-01-24.txt:18:22:53: <andreou> hey 2003-01-25.txt:13:52:39: <lament> hi. 2003-01-25.txt:13:52:51: <Speuler> 'mrng 2003-01-25.txt:13:56:35: <Speuler> what's the current project going on here ? 2003-01-25.txt:13:57:12: <lament> idling. 2003-01-25.txt:13:58:54: <Speuler> this may be the space for my future project :) 2003-01-25.txt:13:59:28: <Speuler> need sombody to sponsor it though 2003-01-25.txt:13:59:46: <lament> heh. 2003-01-25.txt:18:27:25: <exarkun> Anyone familiar w/ Concurrent Funge 98? 2003-01-25.txt:18:56:12: <exarkun> hey lament 2003-01-25.txt:18:56:48: <lament> hi. 2003-01-25.txt:18:57:15: <exarkun> d'you know if the stack stack is shared between threads in concurrent funge? 2003-01-25.txt:18:57:19: <exarkun> or if each has its own? 2003-01-25.txt:18:57:54: <fizzie> each has its own stack. 2003-01-25.txt:18:57:55: <fizzie> iirc. 2003-01-25.txt:18:58:07: <exarkun> yea, each has its own stack 2003-01-25.txt:18:58:15: <lament> I have never heard of concurrent funge :( 2003-01-25.txt:18:58:16: <exarkun> but the docs don't say anything about the stack stack 2003-01-25.txt:18:58:50: <exarkun> oh well, I'll assume they each have their own for now, and maybe email the guy and ask him to clarify :) 2003-01-25.txt:18:58:52: <fizzie> wellll.. stack is just what's on top of the stack stack. 2003-01-25.txt:18:59:01: <fizzie> so I'd say it's not shared. 2003-01-25.txt:18:59:23: <fizzie> in befunge97 or 96 they had shared stacks, which sounds really, really sick. 2003-01-25.txt:18:59:40: <fizzie> doesn't matter much, haven't seen any concurrent-funge programs yet really. 2003-01-25.txt:20:45:25: <lament> yay 2003-01-25.txt:20:50:14: <Aardappel> let the worshipping begin 2003-01-25.txt:20:50:31: <lament> heh 2003-01-25.txt:20:51:07: <fredrik> yay 2003-01-25.txt:20:57:28: <lament> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.<. 2003-01-25.txt:21:14:50: <andreou> hello world 2003-01-25.txt:21:19:28: <lament> hi. 2003-01-25.txt:21:19:42: <lament> worship him. 2003-01-25.txt:21:20:02: <andreou> lament: you were exiled? 2003-01-25.txt:21:20:18: <lament> I don't think so 2003-01-25.txt:21:20:43: <andreou> I thought this was the ``lament worshiping channel''. 2003-01-25.txt:21:21:26: <lament> not anymore. Now we all worship aardappel. 2003-01-25.txt:21:22:16: <andreou> Is this transferrable? If I get aard to worship me, will your aard worships be transferred to me too? 2003-01-25.txt:21:23:14: <lament> You could try. 2003-01-25.txt:21:26:13: <lament> andreou: we haven't yet established that aard worhips you. 2003-01-25.txt:21:27:21: <lament> cheap! 2003-01-25.txt:21:28:45: <Taaus> Wow... You made lament talk like a baby chicken... Your powers are indeed divine. 2003-01-25.txt:21:30:11: <andreou> You mean, there were questions? 2003-01-25.txt:21:30:52: <lament> I am god. 2003-01-25.txt:21:30:59: <andreou> I am good. 2003-01-25.txt:21:31:07: <Taaus> I thought lilo was god ;) 2003-01-25.txt:21:31:17: <lament> lilo is the ain-sof 2003-01-25.txt:21:31:22: <lament> meaning, there's no end to his wallops. 2003-01-25.txt:21:31:33: <Taaus> Don't use +w, then. 2003-01-25.txt:21:31:36: <lament> I'm only one of the sephiroth. 2003-01-25.txt:21:38:03: <andreou> as in ``with the wind'',... 2003-01-25.txt:21:40:16: <lament> Taaus: see what happens when you worship the wrong deity. 2003-01-25.txt:21:41:10: <Taaus> :/ 2003-01-25.txt:21:41:21: <Taaus> I'll just worship lilo instead... :x 2003-01-25.txt:21:41:40: <lament> lilo is not very esoteric. 2003-01-25.txt:21:42:01: <Taaus> True. 2003-01-25.txt:21:42:08: <Taaus> I'll worship myself, then. 2003-01-25.txt:21:43:11: <lament> I don't think you can do that -- Russell's paradox rears its beautiful head. 2003-01-25.txt:21:43:27: <lament> If you worship yourself, your head might turn into a Bottom. 2003-01-25.txt:21:44:18: <Taaus> Who's to say that hasn't already happened? ;) 2003-01-25.txt:21:56:08: <lament> There should be a Discordian Public License. 2003-01-25.txt:21:58:25: <fredrik> pip pip 2003-01-25.txt:21:59:40: <lament> Can a self-denying document have legal meaning? [too many lines; stopping]