Mercurial > repo
view paste/paste.20141 @ 12003:780525831f41 draft
<int-e> ` rm a.out izhash.c test2 testfile
author | HackEso <hackeso@esolangs.org> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:53:54 +0000 |
parents | e037173e0012 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
2003-07-30.txt:20:52:24: <Taaus> Just make it output Lilypond code ;) 2003-07-30.txt:20:53:06: <lament> except i couldn't install lilypond last time i tried 2003-07-30.txt:20:53:49: <Taaus> Yes. Using Lilypond. 2003-07-30.txt:21:05:11: <lament> of course lilypond is also affected by similar cuteness 2003-07-30.txt:21:06:44: <Taaus> Not quite.. Lilypond isn't _restricted_ to major/minor... It just has good definitions to start with... A _lot_ of music is either in the major or minor mode. 2007-07-15.txt:00:55:49: <pikhq> Figs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond 2007-07-18.txt:05:57:15: <pikhq> Figs: Just learn LilyPond syntax, and get some really, *really* good typeset sheet music. 2007-07-18.txt:05:58:16: <Figs> LilyPond doesn't do playback though, does it? 2009-02-17.txt:21:53:28: <lament> *lilypond 2009-09-28.txt:06:46:05: <Gregor> (And, by proxy, lilypond) 2010-01-19.txt:02:56:31: <Gregor> Lilypond 2010-01-19.txt:02:56:37: <Gregor> Rosegarden to generate the Lilypond 2010-01-19.txt:02:58:25: <Gregor> (Lilypond, if you don't know, is TeX for musical notation) 2010-01-19.txt:03:02:04: <pikhq> I could've sworn Lilypond was smarter than that. 2010-01-19.txt:03:03:57: <pikhq> Maybe you could get the Lilypond developers to use Opus 10 for the stuff to fix in Lilypond? :P 2010-05-16.txt:01:12:13: <alise> pikhq: *LilyPond. 2010-06-26.txt:01:58:39: <alise> lilypond is pretty 2010-06-26.txt:01:59:01: <Gregor> alise: All that I have sheet music of is lilypondized. 2010-08-13.txt:17:36:03: <Gregor-W> (UNRELATED) It amuses me that LilyPond's motto is "Music notation for everyone" 2010-08-13.txt:17:37:22: <alise> cpressey: Uh, LilyPond is excellent. 2010-08-13.txt:17:37:32: <Gregor-W> cpressey: LilyPond is fucking amazing. 2010-08-13.txt:17:37:58: <alise> I don't do music, but if I did, fuck yeah, LilyPond. Extremely high-quality typesetting of musical notation, no fucking with stupid GUIs. 2010-08-13.txt:17:38:46: <Gregor-W> Yeah. I've gotten used Rosegarden. It's not great ... I actually output LilyPond from Rosegarden, then make changes to that. To keep that maintainable I keep the whole thing in an hg repo with the original and modified in different branches X_X 2010-08-13.txt:17:39:44: <Gregor-W> It's basically just sufficient to allow me to input from MIDI, then output LilyPond :P 2010-08-13.txt:23:17:43: <alise> {OGG, MP3, FLAC, DPR, DPR-pedal} and {PDF, Rosegarden, LilyPond} 2010-08-13.txt:23:18:44: <alise> PDF first for notation since most people just want to take a look, Rosegarden for the tinkerers, and LilyPond for people who want to criticise your source code. 2010-09-10.txt:05:14:50: <Gregor> Yeah, that's a bit of a Lilypond anomaly ... 2010-09-11.txt:02:03:47: <Gregor> http://codu.org/tmp/GRegor-op13-mov2-wipp7.pdf I've gotten too notationally clever, and Lilypond doesn't like me for it. 2010-09-12.txt:05:21:42: <alise> TeX but with music -- you mean LilyPond. 2010-10-12.txt:06:12:10: <catseye> i'm surprised lilypond can do that 2010-10-12.txt:06:42:54: <Gregor> quintopia: Rosegarden to lilypond, then fixes over that lilypond. 2010-11-13.txt:22:27:30: <zzo38> Does Lilypond not produce DVI output? And it works with LaTeX, it won't work with Plain TeX? 2010-11-13.txt:22:32:02: <zzo38> That is the problem, how many things GNU Lilypond requirement for compiling (and for running, too), and yet it won't make proper DVI files. 2010-11-13.txt:22:32:25: <elliott> zzo38: Lilypond isn't LaTeX or TeX. 2010-11-13.txt:22:33:58: <zzo38> And it has a lot of requirements http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-program/Requirements#Requirements 2011-01-27.txt:05:29:42: <zzo38> Gregor: Maybe you should write more music, write John Stump style music. Probably GNU Lilypond can do that. 2011-01-27.txt:05:30:02: <Gregor> GNU Lilypond can't write music :P 2011-01-27.txt:05:30:20: <zzo38> You can use GNU Lilypond for writing music. 2011-01-27.txt:05:30:45: <Gregor> You can use GNU Lilypond for /notating/ music. 2011-01-27.txt:05:30:57: <zzo38> Your files are in GNU Lilypond, that's what I saw, I think. 2011-01-27.txt:05:32:01: <zzo38> Then make a John Stump style music and notate it with GNU Lilypond. 2011-01-27.txt:05:32:45: <zzo38> I read that DVI files created with Lilypond will not contain note heads. Is that right? If so, that is a serious problem. 2011-01-29.txt:07:49:23: <pikhq> I do hope that someday Lilypond will be able to typeset Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz, and Strin Quartet No. 556(b) for Strings In A Minor (Motoring Accident). 2011-12-28.txt:09:48:41: <HackEgo> 2010-01-19.txt:02:58:25: <Gregor> (Lilypond, if you don't know, is TeX for musical notation) 2011-12-28.txt:09:54:00: <itidus21> `pastelogs lilypond