view paste/paste.29345 @ 6941:261be2d51dea

<oerjan> learn Postorder is the same as Polish notation, since Post was Polish. Not to be confused with reverse Polish notation, which puts operations last.
author HackBot
date Wed, 24 Feb 2016 05:00:46 +0000
parents 0eed5e34bab7
children
line wrap: on
line source

2013-01-18.txt:17:22:34: <Sgeo_> `olist
2013-01-30.txt:22:01:41: <oerjan> `olist
2013-01-30.txt:22:04:25: <elliott> `olist
2013-01-30.txt:22:05:24: <oerjan> `olist
2013-01-30.txt:22:06:00: <oerjan> `olist
2013-02-01.txt:02:49:14: <oerjan> `olist #I don't think shachaf was here when I did this
2013-02-07.txt:21:32:14: <Sgeo> `olist
2013-02-12.txt:23:09:57: <Sgeo> `olist
2013-02-12.txt:23:48:25: <oerjan> <Sgeo> `olist <-- that's not new, i'm pretty sure i did `olist for it before.
2013-02-12.txt:23:52:04: <oerjan> wait, _both_ i and Sgeo did `olist.
2013-02-18.txt:19:38:32: <Sgeo> `olist
2013-02-18.txt:19:40:03: <boily> `olist
2013-02-20.txt:07:16:27: <Sgeo> `pastelogs `olist
2013-02-21.txt:07:44:27: <doesthiswork> `olist
2013-02-21.txt:08:42:52: <oklopol> `olist
2013-02-21.txt:08:49:00: <doesthiswork> `olist
2013-02-21.txt:08:49:16: <shachaf> doesthiswork: You should stop running `olist when there aren't actually updates.
2013-02-21.txt:08:50:19: <Sgeo> `olist is just a fixed list of people
2013-02-21.txt:08:50:23: <oklopol> i read `olist as `list in shachaf's message
2013-02-25.txt:12:32:16: <Sgeo_> `olist
2013-02-25.txt:12:34:35: <oerjan> i thought i saw it because someone here had used `olist
2013-02-26.txt:22:05:12: <Sgeo_> `olist
2013-02-27.txt:21:31:54: <Sgeo> `olist
2013-02-28.txt:05:24:26: <shachaf> For `olisting.
2013-03-01.txt:01:02:12: <shachaf> `olist
2013-03-01.txt:01:16:51: <shachaf> `olist (Sorry!)
2013-03-01.txt:01:19:07: <shachaf> `olist
2013-03-01.txt:20:53:21: <Sgeo> `olist
2013-03-02.txt:02:15:42: <oerjan> `olist
2013-03-02.txt:02:16:15: <shachaf> oerjan: I don't see an update since Sgeo's `olist?
2013-03-02.txt:02:17:21: <oerjan> after his `olist i found #874, which was new to me then
2013-03-02.txt:02:17:37: <shachaf> When I saw his `olist I saw 875
2013-03-02.txt:23:38:46: <Sgeo> `olist
2013-03-04.txt:02:23:08: <Sgeo> `olist
2013-03-05.txt:02:49:13: <oerjan> `olist
2013-03-06.txt:05:17:58: <shachaf> `olist
2013-03-13.txt:11:04:40: <Sgeo> `olist
2013-03-22.txt:20:39:48: <shachaf> `olist
2013-03-22.txt:20:40:01: <shachaf> `olist
2013-03-22.txt:20:40:16: <shachaf> `olist
2013-03-30.txt:13:18:52: <Sgeo> `olist
2013-03-30.txt:22:03:21: <shachaf> `olist
2013-03-30.txt:22:04:34: <shachaf> Did someone `olist?
2013-03-30.txt:22:10:24: <FireFly> What does the `olist signify?
2013-04-08.txt:01:50:31: <shachaf> zzo38: Do you want to be on `olist?
2013-04-08.txt:01:50:48: <zzo38> What is a `olist?
2013-04-09.txt:21:17:50: <shachaf> Hmm, on Apr 01 I should've claimed an `olist update and blamed it on oerjan's cache that he couldn't see it.
2013-04-09.txt:23:24:43: <Sgeo> `olist
2013-04-09.txt:23:25:17: <Sgeo> Sorry I didn't do `olist about an hour sooner. Was commuting back home
2013-04-09.txt:23:31:09: <Sgeo> <shachaf> Where's the next `olist?
2013-04-11.txt:10:25:51: <shachaf> Do you follow `olist?
2013-04-11.txt:10:25:56: <shachaf> We can put you on `olist.
2013-04-14.txt:12:49:32: <Taneb> Nonetheless, I suspect `olist may be used properly before `slist is again
2013-04-14.txt:12:50:04: <shachaf> do you even read `olist
2013-04-17.txt:03:58:28: <Sgeo> `olist