2005-10-25.txt:23:44:45: <jix> !glass http://rafb.net/paste/results/u8OmKA86.txt
2005-12-01.txt:16:45:20: <nooga> http://rafb.net/paste/results/MS6Mtu81.html
2005-12-09.txt:21:12:36: <jix> typedef uint8_t u8;
2005-12-09.txt:21:12:51: <jix> then u8 is a 8bit unsigned
2005-12-09.txt:21:21:47: <fizzie> Then you'll probably need to do something like  #ifdef UINT8_MAX  typedef uint8_t u8; #define SET8(a,b) ((a) = (b)) #define GET8(a) (a)  #else  typedef uint_fast8_t u8; #define SET8(a,b) ((a) = ((b)&0xff)) #define GET8(a) ((a)&0xff)  #endif,  if you want your thing to work on platforms where no 8-bit integers exist.
2006-09-09.txt:00:48:33: <calamari> mplayer filename.mp3 -ao pcm:nowaveheader:file=output.dsp -srate 8000 -af-adv force=1 -af channels=1,format=u8
2006-09-09.txt:00:51:53: <calamari> u8 = unsigned 80bit
2006-10-19.txt:05:00:12: <calamari> mplayer filename.mp3 -ao pcm:nowaveheader:file=audio.dsp -srate 8000 -af-adv force=1 -af channels=1 -format u8
2007-07-02.txt:09:11:03: <immibis> !factoid qemu8 is an emulator which is endorsed by GreaseMonkey.
2007-07-02.txt:09:14:12: <GreaseMonkey> ?qemu8
2007-07-02.txt:09:14:13: <toBogE> qemu8 is an emulator which is endorsed by GreaseMonkey.
2007-07-02.txt:09:14:21: <GreaseMonkey> !factoid qemu8 is
2007-07-02.txt:09:14:22: <GreaseMonkey> ?qemu8
2007-07-02.txt:09:14:24: <toBogE> qemu8 is an emulator which is endorsed by GreaseMonkey.
2007-07-02.txt:09:14:28: <GreaseMonkey> !factoid qemu8 is
2007-07-02.txt:09:14:29: <GreaseMonkey> ?qemu8
2007-07-02.txt:09:14:31: <toBogE> qemu8 is an emulator which is endorsed by GreaseMonkey.
2007-07-02.txt:09:20:24: <immibis> !factoid qemu8 is
2007-07-02.txt:09:20:30: <immibis> ?qemu8
2007-07-02.txt:09:20:34: <toBogE> qemu8 is an emulator which is endorsed by GreaseMonkey.
2007-07-02.txt:09:20:47: <immibis> !factoid qemu8 is
2007-07-02.txt:09:20:53: <immibis> ?qemu8
2007-07-02.txt:09:20:53: <toBogE> qemu8 is an emulator which is endorsed by GreaseMonkey.
2007-07-02.txt:09:20:59: <immibis> !factoid qemu8 is !
2007-07-02.txt:09:21:01: <immibis> ?qemu8
2007-07-02.txt:09:21:15: <immibis> !factoid qemu8 is qemu, version 8
2007-07-02.txt:09:21:21: <immibis> !factoid qemu8 is qemu, version 8 which is not known to exist yet
2007-08-26.txt:10:29:26: <Figs> http://rafb.net/p/MeAsRu82.html
2008-04-19.txt:19:51:28: <EsoBot> fdft`      uf1ffJfufffSff1fdfff1fBdfeff1ufKfudff[ff f fwdfm`ffSfffu`f$ffffuIf6ffu8fffu'ff%ffufKfuff1f[ffUfWfVfSfgfD$gfT$gf$f.gfBf=vfffffgf\$ff1f1gT$ft rftOfukM< vegf|$f<=ug?ugf\$f1f>g|$ v3gfGg8D$t*f"< v< vgf$fHf9}gfCfEf1fFfwdgfagf<$tgfff[f^f_f]fVWQfY_^fWffiQfY_ffffff@uf$ffPfh$fh)ff)fffUfWfVfSfgfL$fgfD$fgf$gf9D$}8ffPfh$fgfD$ffPfh$fpffpgf|$uf1bf%ff1f1gfD$gf(f1tfVfWfhQ%f#ffFf tffGffuf
2008-06-24.txt:15:37:34: <AnMaster> CreateReadAndWrite(U8,  uint8_t)
2008-06-24.txt:20:00:19: <AnMaster> it is default gnu89 I think?
2008-06-24.txt:20:00:35: <AnMaster> but gnu89 wouldn't
2008-06-24.txt:20:01:42: <AnMaster> so I got no idea if gnu89 will work correctly
2008-06-24.txt:20:05:52: <AnMaster> ais523, so really trying to convert it to gnu89 is totally unsupported from my side?
2008-06-24.txt:20:14:42: <AnMaster> also gnu89 *does* support varadic macros
2008-06-24.txt:20:42:00: <ais523> interpreter.c99:72: warning: C99 inline functions are not supported; using GNU89
2008-06-24.txt:20:44:29: <AnMaster> I just have no intention on supporting compiling as gnu89
2008-06-24.txt:20:44:50: <ais523> what does gnu89 inline mean anyway?
2008-06-24.txt:20:45:55: <AnMaster> however "extern inline" and "inline" without extern have reversed meanings beteween gnu89 and C99 iirc
2008-07-13.txt:22:46:27: <tusho> http://rafb.net/p/Eou8W588.txt
2008-09-23.txt:20:32:01: <tusho> sruq894ue98tjmf98ujirkuioaua89w4k09e8rsah7ye8a95jye6897hyyujmriouj89048dk89es7kru8txinjcv dhjkzsu98ra7ik8sdiopufjdnvm hsektufy978
2008-09-29.txt:14:50:06: <tusho> AnMaster: dfhsu akaesthilru2314892u18902412349u89234
2008-10-08.txt:06:20:28: <fungot> aju868
2009-01-07.txt:20:41:51: <ehird> AnMaster: average is 0.62 http://pastie.org/354977.txt?key=inzzwzudzj4u82liaeozw
2009-01-29.txt:17:26:51: <AnMaster> ehird, does http://rafb.net/p/0gPG5U88.html  make any sense to you?
2009-02-05.txt:23:40:22: <ehird> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7qyjLuWVU8
2009-04-11.txt:19:39:00: <Judofyr> ehird: http://pastie.textmate.org/private/js9hcu8mqsx4xl5vsmn4q
2009-05-26.txt:18:03:33: <ais523> dqAUo3AQzWWvZ-IHZGNfi0Z7Aw_GC2pam5X39xkdFHQI7ggSNE53QMYBSeyAJ0%7cbqkyg7YNVpHIk_tGrE-68fFnc0kX79Qa913-xSLSZPAMHlyIubz_4wrZrNk2u9vRhHOv7W%7cIMMKtMGhuMz8vkVo7mLi9UQCNkMi6CQhsTCulqkVImjKunHUWsHfINxwd7vLcmfnTR_FYm%7c1243357268; navcmd=_xclick; pNTcMTtQfrJuaJiwEnWXQ6yNxfq=5mv9RU4DctpsQ9re8jiTEh_JImwBUbicIr7FvspGKVQe8hjrwdl_RlC99UYGDLzzp3vd1gAmrIbXQqXt8oETB_fq6Ge1UBpjmfKeevJ8goC2hs5tc3KX_Ho1I6wIgIN0vjhyfY9ftf2FxLYIdIEu8bg7EBQXC-
2009-05-26.txt:18:03:34: <ais523> TVzUYFXxJETr2tshK8PcCE4y5z5tFohs4wYca_1iIRds5Rz1VAhhu84PwLZYw_JAKatkZtmxn84zZYjC-TSp4nhXOFctIUj50m0BTwK8IVThZXxMZ-DgPVnkrX36pzZ4ZxTWdks-7k7i5p8Boqy0JoN-kIeG1qgV4uTn4ajaZP9ZNCsmGOsBCvXvC9cc68-moa-DQxi_oE_0OpF7tE; 6Vt_kuBZl8VlyHAqyfqTECtzKXS=4FmsD86w5SZMRES5DmDJOUf8i2MUEbgVvNrxy-YD1bl1DQlvynIlaY86brrCYbUQzov9tNBAz90bxc47
2009-05-28.txt:23:20:46: <Deewiant> http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hRIu8-oMq5U5Kl6RtgGZAtmoNyfw
2009-07-22.txt:20:38:06: <GregorR-L> http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41%2B3Uu8q-HL._AA280_.jpg <-- it just gave me this image. One word: "wtf?"
2009-07-27.txt:15:42:48: <ehird> "You want you too you wait for unsigned". (U1 U2 U8 :P)
2009-08-07.txt:15:02:07: <ehird> http://s3.amazonaws.com/data.tumblr.com/PwccqNBl5qtxvki3vTc7oo9no1_1280.png?AWSAccessKeyId=0RYTHV9YYQ4W5Q3HQMG2&Expires=1249740096&Signature=iPL8Sjiw8BVkaPnSLT5dhf3vbU8%3D ;; Well, this is simple!
2009-08-07.txt:17:10:41: <ehird> http://pastie.org/575632.txt?key=maxdtnu8lhtptvmdwqwkfq
2009-08-07.txt:17:51:39: <ehird> ais523: http://pastie.org/575632.txt?key=maxdtnu8lhtptvmdwqwkfq (ignore the case 4:) line
2009-10-13.txt:15:49:05: <ehird> 12q33w4e5dt67y12345e6r76t87y89u9i234w5ed6fr7t78gyh8u90iJ_0Okp322222222222wsss4ed5rf6tg77hy8u99ji00ko--23w4se5drrrrrft67ghu89i0-oooop123w4e5dgt67uy89j0ik-ol=;23w4e5dt67ghu89j0iko-p=[
2009-10-18.txt:12:57:54: <ehird> 123qw4e555t67gu89i932qw4e55t67
2009-12-12.txt:13:24:16: <fizzie> ui.c:254: warning: C99 inline functions are not supported; using GNU89
2009-12-24.txt:07:56:39: -!- zzo38 has quit ("* I'm too lame to read LKAJSDFPONAEITOGUMW4OTU89M3MYMIOYM2A9X084YTM87)))K:f_)>+<*ym@gy<*hwg*hgehx)iuLZAA.doc *").
2010-01-15.txt:04:11:13: <ehird> gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) 4.4.1
2010-03-05.txt:14:41:08: <scarf> AnMaster: u8ok for arrows
2010-03-05.txt:18:54:05: <AnMaster> (I guess gnu89 could have worked too, didn't try it)
2010-03-05.txt:22:33:19: <cpressey> I like this one! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBHWOzNBU8
2010-03-18.txt:00:02:09: <Deewiant> http://pastebin.com/U816YgtS is what it comes out with now (minus 30000 movb's)
2010-03-20.txt:18:12:40: <alise> [#324qw56e7ri8ulp9jo[0j['0oi;pj0l98hyngtfrxeadwq4rs6hu8,ghp0oi[;0,l98gu7y6tfry5d6t4esrw3aqe4st6p0o'l[0ogy6utfd65eswra432qstdey6p[0o'0j98sw5y6gtik09y6tr4eswgr4sw6tr4efwas4uy60pytfresar6y6tr4fesw646ir4fe3r4y6eaw87tr4ef
2010-05-04.txt:04:08:32: <cap11235> What happens when you run 'modprobe snd_au8830' as root?
2010-05-04.txt:04:09:19: <calamari> FATAL: Module snd_au8830 not found.
2010-05-04.txt:04:09:32: <cap11235> Try 'modprobe snd-au8830'
2010-05-04.txt:04:13:43: <calamari> ./kernel/sound/pci/au88x0/snd-au8830.ko
2010-05-04.txt:04:18:59: <calamari> insmod: error inserting '/lib/modules/2.6.28-18-generic/kernel/sound/pci/au88x0/snd-au8830.ko': -1 Invalid module format
2010-05-04.txt:04:25:07: <cap11235> "apt-file search snd-au8830.ko" as root
2010-06-11.txt:12:53:26: <AnMaster> [    0.000000] Linux version 2.6.31-22-generic (buildd@crested) (gcc version 4.4.1 (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) ) #60-Ubuntu SMP Thu May 27 02:41:03 UTC 2010 (Ubuntu 2.6.31-22.60-generic)
2010-06-21.txt:23:56:17: <olsner> (the name of a Shulman song, btw, http://open.spotify.com/track/77srFu8ZmyivyhM9YZkNlk)
2010-07-26.txt:00:44:05: <Gregor> I stole that from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0Xa4bHcJu8 , which you should watch if you feel you're no longer in need of your sanity.
2010-07-31.txt:23:50:57: <Gregor> Phantom_Hoover: Not since I watched http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0Xa4bHcJu8
2010-08-01.txt:02:51:32: <Gregor> I'll spam link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0Xa4bHcJu8 instead
2010-08-24.txt:02:26:38: <alise> http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/d4gu8/askreddit_what_are_some_unexplainable_things_you/
2010-10-17.txt:03:35:22: <catseye> SGeo: Here, get giddy with joy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCaU8LcwGTA
2010-10-31.txt:04:06:40: <elliott> pikhq: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuOB2_u87fo
2010-11-13.txt:20:11:38: <fizzie> "Sun Fire 880     8 x 900 MHz UltraSPARC III+     16 GB RAM      Solaris 10 10/09 s10s_u8wos_08a SPARC"
2010-11-15.txt:22:12:13: <fizzie> echo `od -An -N8 -tu8 /dev/urandom` 1728038%p | dc
2010-11-15.txt:22:13:50: <elliott> ;   n=`{echo `{od -An -N8 -tu8 /dev/urandom} $linecount % p | dc}
2010-11-15.txt:22:14:45: <elliott> ;   n=`{echo `{od -An -N8 -tu8 /dev/urandom} $linecount'%p' | dc}
2010-11-15.txt:22:14:55: <elliott> ; echo `{od -An -N8 -tu8 /dev/urandom} $linecount'%p'
2010-11-15.txt:22:16:28: <fizzie> Anyway, with -N8 -tu8 that takes a random number in the [0, 2^64-1] range, so the bias with modulo-1728038 will be that some lines are taken with a probability of 0.00000057869097786042607 and some with 0.00000057869097786048028, while they should be uniformly 0.00000057869097786044057.
2010-11-16.txt:21:59:55: <elliott> http://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/image?c=03AHJ_VutELgGQ23UEOR4UMo73E5ZtPQujY1tbYuonaG8cfhiJ7qzTRCPSV1nYXXP_9VmMqtEIR9tNvV2Jm5wXMrROAxdbuUf8WHxcanzn9ggGTl4ndwuvAhjeJ275UQdtPTxzguqat0U8VcALxAob8qvAfBgVeNi9DA
2010-11-22.txt:14:34:00: <elliott> echo u89sfus98s9 >prefaux
2010-12-07.txt:00:28:05: <elliott> ^?ELF^A^A^A^C^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^B^@^C^@^A^@^@^@L<80>^D^H,^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@4^@ ^@^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<80>^D^H^@<80>^D^H/^A^@^@3^A^@^@^G^@^@^@^@^P^@^@ZY»^M<81>^D^H<89>Ï1À<8d>Hÿò®<89>Ð<8b>Oü¿/<81>^D^H<81>ùccd^@^O<95>^G<89>Þ<8d>K^D<8d>S^OHt#[<81>;-ccdt^Eö^Gÿt        Æ^G^@H<89>ót^M[Ht       YHt^EZHt^A_QSö^Gÿu^Ej^VXÍ<80>1ɵ^Hj^EXÍ<80>P<85>Àx9¹    S^@^@<89>Ãj6XÍ<80>ö^Gÿu8SR1Ò²^K¹$<81>^D^Hj^A[j^DXÍ<80>²^A1Ûj^CXÍ<80>Z[¹
2010-12-17.txt:00:37:28: <elliott> Vorpal: WHOOPS LOOK AT THAT http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm301/r3ynor/plateau8.png in-air minecarts in single-player survival game
2010-12-22.txt:19:33:34: <elliott> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ND7tU8JME_g
2010-12-30.txt:23:43:28: <zzo38> Very retarded I think. I think GNU C uses gnu89 by default so it doesn't enable any of the stupid C99 features, only the non-stupid ones are enabled.
2010-12-30.txt:23:44:46: <zzo38> So I use gnu89 mode which is the default mode.
2011-01-13.txt:11:55:25: <fizzie> C1x also adds u8"foo" UTF-8 string literals, and u"foo" / U"foo" Unicode wide-character (of type char16_t / char32_t, corresponding to UTF-16 / UTF-32, respectively) string literals, and a <uchar.h> header for conflaburating in-between things.
2011-01-13.txt:21:04:20: <elliott> WHYWYHOIERYDRLTKJFGH,IOJKLD;SA'SC.F,GNMHLG;KJFD;SPOACLV,XCMVNBL,FGKTRPOEI45039ROKIO908I94586U859RTUYIR9TUJWHY
2011-01-23.txt:18:17:23: <elliott> HOW DO YOU DO CHARSETS WITH HASKELL ASKJXGCYKLDFJHCNVKFJGNKGDXLF;SJ,NMBGHJDSUIDAOK;LCMVNBSJKGHRIJE89MU84OEITJRDGKLFMCVGDTRIO54896UFGJKNJKGTUIIGJKFN
2011-04-15.txt:22:39:28: <news-ham> Magazine: Our Elderly Wildlife Issuehttp://feeds.theonion.com/~r/theonion/daily/~3/u8A4tk_8uY0/
2011-05-08.txt:02:06:24: <oerjan> 05:13:28 <Phantom_Hoover> http://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/h5wv8/your_thoughts_on_a_feynman_quote/c1stu8p
2011-05-23.txt:15:17:24: <Phantom_Hoover> http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/hhsu8/its_official_i_have_no_life/
2011-06-15.txt:17:43:13: <pikhq> ais523: With the compatibility one being enabled by -std=c89, std=gnu89, -fgnu89-line, or attribute((gnu_inline)).
2011-06-16.txt:06:23:42: <zzo38> In addition to C99, you might also need to have one for C89, GNU89, GNU99, and the newer draft standards.
2011-06-18.txt:01:56:08: <zzo38> And if you want to avoid GNU89 then you can test for that too in some way.
2011-06-18.txt:02:12:16: <zzo38> And perhaps also "gnu89" to use the "gnu89" version (Clang also supports "gnu89" mode).
2011-06-18.txt:02:40:09: <zzo38> Although perhaps it might be useful to have a macro called "gnu89" which tests for all the GNU extensions except the ones that are intentionally not supported in Clang.
2011-06-18.txt:22:03:56: <Vorpal> pikhq_, ekopath just let me down: "warning: C99 inline functions are not supported; using GNU89"
2011-06-23.txt:04:54:08: <zzo38> C99 includes some things I think do not belong. Even GNU89 includes some things I think do not belong. Is why I invent this subset (I believe it works in GNU89 mode in both GCC and LLVM C compiler, but both of them support more than what I said)
2011-06-24.txt:20:41:03: <zzo38> And what I was proposing with C, is I mentioned list of things, which is a superset of C89 but a subset of GNU89. So maybe something similar idea with Haskell.
2011-06-24.txt:20:46:41: <zzo38> (Also a subset of the features that Clang supports in GNU89 mode)
2011-07-01.txt:04:52:11: <zzo38> I happen to like a subset of the "GNU89" version of C
2011-07-16.txt:10:13:13: <oklopol> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMGIbOGu8q0&feature=related fny sho
2011-08-23.txt:23:21:49: <zzo38> When programming in C, I usually prefer a subset of GNU89.
2011-08-23.txt:23:22:29: <zzo38> (GNU89 does have some of the things that were added in C99, too)
2011-08-27.txt:08:27:35: <CakeProphet> U8expect;/* how to interpret ambiguous tokens */
2011-08-27.txt:08:27:53: <CakeProphet> that's U8 expect;
2011-09-12.txt:01:58:55: <ais523> http://maps.google.com/maps?saddr=hexham+uk&daddr=birmingham+uk&hl=en&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=34.122306,85.869141&geocode=FWjHRgMdAf3f_ykVmDENYpB9SDEEwA0heCs6qA%3BFZHTIAMdKBvj_ylzcUEbLZRwSDGYee6u8P6Byg&vpsrc=0&mra=ls&t=m&z=7
2011-10-21.txt:07:26:32: <Patashu> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u88AOoYAOQE this is pretty much the best TAS
2011-11-01.txt:19:28:50: <elliott> Foo links to /nix/store/89sdfusd89fu89sdfu9-libssl-3.9/lib/libssl.so
2011-11-01.txt:19:29:16: <elliott> Empty RPATH, linking to /nix/store/89sdfusd89fu89sdfu9-libssl-3.9/lib/libssl.so? RPATH=/nix/store/89sdfusd89fu89sdfu9-libssl-3.9/lib, linking to libssl.so?
2011-12-24.txt:12:56:57: <fizzie> Vorpal: And we have wchar_t, but it's not explicitly Unicode-related at all. C11x adds char16_t and char32_t which are always in UTF-16 and UTF-32, respectively, and functions to deal with that; as well as u8"foo" string literals that are always UTF-8.
2011-12-24.txt:13:07:23: <fizzie> Anyway, for string literals "foo" is in char with unspecified encoding, L"foo" is in wchar_t with unspecified encoding, u"foo" and U"foo" are in char16_t and char32_t, respectively, with unspecified encoding unless those macros are defined; and, finally, u8"foo" is also in char, but explicitly UTF-8 encoded.
2011-12-26.txt:17:59:31: <fungot> 2l3o4o5k6s7 8l9i2k3e4 5t6h7i8s9 2i3f4 5y6o7u8 9d2r3o4p5 6t7h8e9 2^3C
2011-12-27.txt:00:10:36: <Vorpal> like u8"foo"
2011-12-27.txt:00:11:15: <Vorpal> `log u8
2011-12-27.txt:00:11:23: <Vorpal> `pastelogs u8
2011-12-27.txt:00:11:25: <Vorpal> `pastelog u8