2003-10-21.txt:00:56:08: <andreou> stevaras that's technically impossible, i've already told you that
2005-05-30.txt:02:30:39: <graue> by the way, you technically have a third instruction: whitespace
2005-06-02.txt:22:04:51: <cpressey> it's a language family, not a single language, technically, so of course it's a royal mess.
2005-06-04.txt:16:17:25: <CXI> well, technically it counts down from 99
2005-06-07.txt:00:44:22: <cpressey> well, text files are technically 1d, no?
2005-06-07.txt:08:55:21: <lament> dunno what's more technically impressive, that thing or the life turing machine
2005-06-11.txt:06:17:22: <GregorR> If you started with >++ you'd be fine, but that may make it unhappy ... it would probably be illegal HTML, technically.
2005-07-08.txt:20:44:58: <cpressey> fungebob: the documentation ( http://catseye.webhop.net/projects/befunge93/doc/befunge93.html ) only says that playfield cells are ASCII afaict.  and ASCII is technically 7-bits, unsigned.
2005-07-27.txt:15:21:19: <int-e> without licenses, noone has the right to use your code in any way, technically.
2005-08-16.txt:23:01:14: <GregorR> Technically, UNdead, in that I resurrected to feast on the entrails of the living, but I'm not alive in the common sense *shrugs*
2005-10-06.txt:04:39:57: <WildHalcyon_> its a pyramid scheme. Technically, a "legal" pyramid scheme. More to the point though, its complete bullshit
2005-10-07.txt:21:14:58: <WildHalcyon> It thinks I pirated this copy of windows, which I technically did, but only because the CD that M$ gave me didn't work, and they refused to give me a new one. Rather than be out $300, I got this one from a friend
2005-10-19.txt:23:57:49: <lament> technically, false says that only a-z should be valid variables
2005-10-22.txt:03:13:35: <GregorR> (Technically you should use PONG :<hostname>, but localhost works fine)
2005-11-25.txt:20:41:06: <calamari> wasn't technically necessary to allow multiple *'s, but it was easy so I did it
2006-01-31.txt:03:34:38: <GregorR> Hmm, transforming this grammar, I had to use 7 LL(2)s ... now, do I continue adjusting to try to get it to LL(1), or do I say "Well, technically, it says he'll accept it in LL(2) form" and be done with it :P
2006-02-04.txt:06:55:40: <GregorR> Technically you could do that either way, but, if you wrote the parser from scratch, it's LL :)
2006-03-04.txt:11:42:57: <fuse> nooga: it's not technically a quine, since the output doesn't look exactly like the original program
2006-05-25.txt:04:55:24: <GregorR> Well, the technically correct definition for 'esoteric' is similar to niche, but as applied to languages it generally means that it's designed more to determine whether strange things are possible than to be usable.  That being said, some of those strange things that have been tried end up being useful, so an esoteric language can definitely be usable.
2006-05-26.txt:07:09:37: <Arrogant> Technically, nothing is passed in, nothing is passed out.
2006-06-16.txt:13:50:16: <Keymaker> or technically two logs :)
2006-07-27.txt:01:11:58: <AndrewNP> Technically it's infinite.
2006-08-06.txt:19:21:20: <Razor-X> ihope: So is EQBF technically ``more'' quantum complete than BF?
2006-08-14.txt:01:19:30: <Razor-X> I'm technically non-native and I did the latter.
2006-08-14.txt:01:19:43: <RodgerTheGreat> technically?
2006-08-16.txt:00:29:05: <CakeProphet> Not sure it was for enforced code style... since technically I could call braces-to-end-keywords a coding style using your definition  :D
2006-08-29.txt:04:13:28: <GreyKnight> Technically it incorporates every story ever written, and many that haven't been, but obviously the author can only cover so much of the multiverse ;-)
2006-08-30.txt:05:31:19: <Razor-X> It's funny, because x / y isn't technically part of the ABNF standard, but it's used everywhere.
2006-09-04.txt:03:42:44: <GreyKnight> technically they're different, but the difference is only in the distance between the dots, so they're generally identical
2006-09-26.txt:19:05:39: <pikhq> Although *technically* pure functional languages have the same thing going on. :p
2006-10-05.txt:00:16:08: <ihope> Technically, "in a /msg" means very little :-P
2006-10-05.txt:12:23:20: <oerjan> most likely. technically EOF does not fit in char.
2006-10-05.txt:23:53:28: * SimonRC finds out what happens if you write sentances by committee:  "Voracious vexillologists believe that the Camelidophobic Esperanto International Association,which is obviously somewhat clever, but technically not very ethical or even subject to the Olympic games of all major holomorphic non-Euclidian institutions of value that are familiar to obsessive ZBBers and recalcitrant anthropomorphic grasshoppers, is concomitantly elucidated, although techni
2006-10-05.txt:23:58:57: <SimonRC>           technically not zompist-approved, nor llamatically endorsed within notably ostentatious sub-committees by
2006-10-05.txt:23:59:26: <SimonRC>           technically not zompist-approved, nor llamatically endorsed within notably ostentatious sub-committees by
2006-10-05.txt:23:59:32: <SimonRC>           technically not zompist-approved, nor llamatically endorsed within notably ostentatious sub-committees by
2006-10-05.txt:23:59:38: <SimonRC>           technically not zompist-approved, nor llamatically endorsed within notably ostentatious sub-committees by
2006-10-05.txt:23:59:44: <SimonRC>           technically not zompist-approved, nor llamatically endorsed within notably ostentatious sub-committees by
2006-10-05.txt:23:59:50: <SimonRC>           technically not zompist-approved, nor llamatically endorsed within notably ostentatious sub-committees by
2006-10-23.txt:04:03:45: <Razor-X> Well, I just got un-busy technically yesterday.
2006-10-23.txt:23:44:03: <oerjan> technically i think you can avoid some of the CASVS problems by just using the nominative case in most cases.
2006-11-19.txt:22:53:36: <CakeProphet> and in my current projects I'm pretty much the most technically inclined person in the group.
2006-11-21.txt:16:33:40: <RodgerTheGreat> although, in my timezone, it's still technically morning.
2006-11-28.txt:01:56:37: <Razor-X> Well, it technically is not public domain.
2006-12-02.txt:04:22:47: <Razor-X> I know in Scheme the only reason I'd use a macro was if some piece of code kept repeating itself over and over again, or I was in this sort of a position, where it's technically better Lisp-style to use a macro to generate the code instead of having a helper procedure produce a procedure that is evaluated by the outer procedure.
2006-12-11.txt:23:19:00: <GregorR-L> Technically no :P
2006-12-26.txt:22:53:19: <oerjan> is it even technically possible?
2006-12-30.txt:23:39:11: <oklopol> well, technically
2006-12-31.txt:02:02:15: <GregorR> Technically speaking, you can implement a o and on method in any class and pass that in instead of an O class *shrugs*
2007-01-19.txt:01:11:23: <CakeProphet> it's technically a finite strip of inifitely divisble data with regular segments of "sound" and "no sound"... a binary encoding that can be divided by any ratio.
2007-01-23.txt:03:15:49: <CakeProphet> befunge isn't technically RPN... it is stack based though.
2007-03-10.txt:21:23:33: <oerjan> so still technically O(1).
2007-03-28.txt:18:47:13: <lament> oerjan: the user freely and (technically) knowingly permits the malware to run.
2007-04-10.txt:23:47:20: <oerjan> so common lisp _behaves_ as if subclasses can override, although technically they don't.
2007-05-28.txt:06:35:20: <GregorR-L> Also, there's still no legal means to declare something as PD short of registering it as such, so most PD stuff isn't technically PD (doesn't matter since that's not really arguable in court)
2007-06-02.txt:06:54:55: <Pikhq> So, &(void*)0; is technically invalid.
2007-06-02.txt:06:55:16: <Pikhq> (more than technically; I think GCC would shoot me for it)
2007-06-04.txt:20:08:58: <CakeProphet> technically, the bf array is just one giant string
2007-06-17.txt:02:21:35: <pikhq> *Technically* yes, but it's less-defined.
2007-06-25.txt:19:13:48: <RodgerTheGreat> if you read that ad and saved $2, they weren't technically lying
2007-07-03.txt:00:25:26: <pikhq> GreaseMonkey: That is technically in violation of Nonlogic's policy.
2007-07-04.txt:04:21:10: <pikhq> Although technically you could build almost all of the builtins from (lambda).
2007-07-05.txt:00:02:41: <Sukoshi> On an old forum I used to go to, we had a joke going where returning values wasn't technically producing output.
2007-07-10.txt:21:42:05: <oklopol> well, they are technically okay, it's just many editors and the command line environment often screw them up
2007-07-15.txt:00:41:33: <pikhq> (PEBBLE code, BTW, is technically 100% valid Tcl code, syntactically)
2007-07-23.txt:19:35:59: <oerjan> technically, e^(2*pi*n*i) = 1 for all integers n
2007-07-27.txt:05:26:59: <Sukoshi> Because objects *are* technically references.
2007-08-01.txt:00:11:58: <lament> SimonRC: technically speaking you still need to know what gules is
2007-08-09.txt:21:40:44: <ihope> Technically meaningless, but still funny :-)
2007-08-19.txt:21:52:01: <Gurami> and technically correct
2007-08-26.txt:00:34:41: <oerjan> although technically it doesn't have hands
2007-09-02.txt:23:39:54: <ihope> And yes, I technically didn't tell you about string literals :-P
2007-09-20.txt:17:39:17: <GregorR> (Of course of course, there are technically grammars that an NPDA can parse that an LALR parser can not)
2007-09-22.txt:02:19:15: <edwardk> though technically the haskell version lazily handles the latter pattern
2007-10-03.txt:14:32:44: <RodgerTheGreat> that's because my scanner isn't technically large enough for my bristol board
2007-10-23.txt:22:58:11: <ehird1> technically if you have the memory my program can support any brainfuck program up to MAX_INT characters
2007-10-26.txt:04:52:56: <pikhq> RodgerTheGreat: Technically, *sleep* is a loss of consciousness.
2007-10-29.txt:20:47:46: <ehird`> technically i could "optimize" , and . with a for loop
2007-11-03.txt:17:41:19: <ehird`> technically, i still need to do the gc
2007-11-11.txt:16:52:49: <oklopol> [[--][+]] -> [[-][]] is technically correct, but ...why the fuck does it optimize it like that?
2007-11-13.txt:04:26:54: <pikhq> Technically, Rodger would be running a *closely related* engine. :p
2007-11-13.txt:19:54:00: <oklokok> asm might technically mean an assembly, as in a mnemonics system... i mean a bytecode system
2007-11-17.txt:18:44:32: <ehird`> pikhq: Yes, it's an operator technically.
2007-11-20.txt:17:37:31: <Slereah> Well, they technically all are a subset of languages.
2007-11-21.txt:16:27:31: <ais523> but this doesn't technically speaking restrict what I/O sequences are allowed, because it can always be stored up until input is needed
2007-11-24.txt:19:29:24: <Figs> I mean, it's technically turing complete...
2007-12-09.txt:19:24:23: <Slereah> But technically, it is still computation :O
2008-01-16.txt:18:20:22: <oerjan> technically he _could_ be called Andrey
2008-01-17.txt:03:10:33: <oklopol> technically.
2008-01-18.txt:19:34:53: <Asztal> because although compilers would technically accept main not being a function...
2008-01-22.txt:15:33:02: <ehird> (technically, the above is what i would respond to if it had said 'christian' or anything else, too)
2008-01-22.txt:21:48:02: <oerjan> hm ... technically the empty program is legal but cannot be quoted...
2008-01-23.txt:05:33:26: <RodgerTheGreat> technically speaking, there's a grain of truth to that. "MInd's Eye", or audiovisual scratchpad, depending which model of cognition you subscribe to. :)
2008-01-23.txt:06:41:36: <adu> technically all edges are "undirected" but somehow know which one is "more positive", which mathematically implies a directed edge
2008-01-24.txt:04:45:31: <RodgerTheGreat> I'm not technically a goon, but I've been quite tempted to buy an account
2008-01-30.txt:22:53:36: <GregorR> Technically people have made it work with no runtime, but you lose many features.
2008-02-03.txt:08:16:06: <adu> because everything can be though of as a query or a command anyways, and if there is no interpretation of either in the current namespace, then there would technically be an error, but if the error of not finding any current bindings was instead used as the method of binding, then the '=' operator is useless
2008-02-04.txt:19:16:25: <ehird`> well, technically THAT doesn't but the k interp is tiny and really fast and IS used for those
2008-02-04.txt:20:27:21: <ais523> even though technically speaking they aren't
2008-02-04.txt:22:03:10: <ais523> technically speaking, all comments have to be replaced by a positive amount of whitespace
2008-02-10.txt:00:37:20: <ehird`> just dejavu sans mono. it's not monospaced, technically, because of the >>> and similar
2008-02-12.txt:22:17:26: <ehird> SimonRC: technically,
2008-02-16.txt:21:57:37: <pikhq> You could, technically, do Malbolge with it.
2008-02-17.txt:03:40:37: <lispy> Sgeo: which reminds me...since TC definition doesn't involves a system clock and user input.  I've sometimes wondered if there are things we could make a modern computer do that a TC technically cannot.
2008-02-19.txt:21:16:01: <ais523> the classic a^=b^=a^=b is unfortunately not portable, and is technically undefined behaviour
2008-02-22.txt:20:05:45: <ais523> and it isn't even an esolang, technically speaking
2008-03-07.txt:20:09:25: <oklopol> i guess technically no, but do realize ehird recalled differently.
2008-03-09.txt:02:51:00: <pikhq> Technically, that's address 0 in kernel mode.
2008-03-10.txt:21:18:38: <ais523> in 2D, if you know for certain you're going non-cardinal, then technically speaking you only need to store the top and bottom
2008-03-12.txt:21:12:28: <AnMaster> ais523_non-admin, and also technically loading the larger program will be slower
2008-03-15.txt:19:59:52: <ehird> technically the spec allows [...] in the program just as a word
2008-03-16.txt:22:35:19: <pikhq> (technically, those are no longer functions, but rather *relations*. . . :p)
2008-03-31.txt:16:17:50: <ais523> which looks perfectly natural, but technically speaking .28 is the extension
2008-04-03.txt:16:45:29: <ais523_> this is as bad as that technically-correct-SGML website that someone, I think maybe pikhq, linked to a while ago
2008-04-04.txt:14:05:55: <ais523> but the result is the POSIX equivalent of a DS9K; yes, technically it complies with the spec, but nobody else does things like that
2008-04-04.txt:21:29:46: <SimonRC> vixey: dragon-shaped, but technically not dragons
2008-04-09.txt:16:15:48: <oklopol> and you technically can't, if lisp is defined to fail in some cases
2008-04-14.txt:11:04:33: <oklopol> i guess it's not technically a quine, because that's not printed to stdout
2008-04-16.txt:17:04:24: <AnMaster> anyway befunge technically got no syntax errors either, it is perfectly valid to use an non-implemented instruction to reflect
2008-04-23.txt:18:45:57: <ehird> ais523: however, technically you don't violate the github tos
2008-04-23.txt:18:47:39: <ais523> ehird: oh, I forgot that you didn't need a TLD for email, technically speaking
2008-05-01.txt:22:24:36: <ais523> AnMaster: technically speaking Windows is POSIX too, at least when they tested it they got a 'did not definitively fail' answer
2008-05-06.txt:22:09:31: <ehird> ais523: technically
2008-05-07.txt:20:42:54: <ehird> technically it'll work
2008-05-08.txt:22:19:10: <ehird> technically, if you give the definition of replace I stated,
2008-05-15.txt:00:20:33: <oerjan> wikipedia tells me that technically coffee beans are not beans either
2008-05-15.txt:22:19:35: <ehird> Technically I have given up on very few projects. But some of them have been at low priority for years.
2008-05-19.txt:05:09:56: <Slereah_> There's three suits, technically
2008-05-26.txt:03:12:27: <oklopol> (well technically it does, but not important here)
2008-05-27.txt:21:18:46: <oklopol> (well technically i did by saying that out loud)
2008-05-28.txt:23:30:35: <ehird> technically that's against freenode rules
2008-05-30.txt:21:19:35: <Slereah_> Well, so's a Turing machine, technically.
2008-05-30.txt:21:23:13: <Slereah_> But I suppose that, technically, there's a twin of the 2,3 machine, with directions reversed, such that right-cut would still be TC.
2008-06-01.txt:14:39:51: <ais523> and technically speaking there's no reason why you couldn't implement curses in Brainfuck, except that that would be insane
2008-06-01.txt:19:23:20: <Slereah> Well, technically, I could just do a replace = by the combinator
2008-06-05.txt:01:02:49: <Slereah> Technically, I think that most of the time, there will only be one argument for it to be valid.
2008-06-06.txt:20:42:41: <oklopol> (got it, i guess i was technically wrong)
2008-06-07.txt:18:23:21: <AnMaster> well it could technically register it
2008-06-07.txt:18:23:32: <tusho> AnMaster: Well, technically it could. But what would it do with it?
2008-06-08.txt:15:26:23: <Slereah> Well, it's technically copyrighted.
2008-06-10.txt:18:31:41: <Slereah7> Plus, technically, it's the same rigid formalism
2008-06-17.txt:21:57:41: <oklopol> well, don't forget Rule on Page, technically i still have the lead with less than 70 points.
2008-06-18.txt:02:20:27: <oklofok> but as i'm in a band (well technically two), i need to drink occasionally
2008-06-19.txt:23:54:02: <AnMaster> technically
2008-06-19.txt:23:54:12: <ais523> well, C-INTERCAL can run on other compilers, technically
2008-06-27.txt:18:32:10: <tusho> technically that has extra whitespace
2008-06-28.txt:01:00:54: <Slereah_> Technically, using Planck units to define units of space time, the entire universe is way under 10^150 units of spacetime
2008-06-28.txt:06:03:03: <psygnisfive> also, it is technically illegal in the US, yes.
2008-06-28.txt:07:58:09: <psygnisfive> which means that technically its not a quine
2008-06-28.txt:08:01:27: <psygnisfive> which i guess is technically what the source is
2008-07-02.txt:19:45:29: <tusho> GregorR: Technically I stole it from Ruby, which does it _unambigiously_
2008-07-03.txt:17:41:35: <AnMaster> ais523, well it can technically
2008-07-07.txt:20:32:41: <ais523> well, technically speaking there are no limitations on fingerprint names
2008-07-13.txt:21:14:47: <tusho> technically it's right.
2008-07-21.txt:03:31:51: <Slereah__> I mean, technically
2008-07-23.txt:17:56:50: <MikeRiley> technically no, other than it says the 0k will not execute the next instruction
2008-07-24.txt:19:13:21: <AnMaster> technically STDIO is system interaction... ;P
2008-07-25.txt:16:12:29: <MikeRiley> technically,,,since the spec says like c fgets, and fgets keeps the line endings....
2008-07-27.txt:16:57:15: <MikeRiley> technically,,,even FNGR could be made to work using this scheme....but will stick with the new FING for doing this kind of thing...
2008-07-27.txt:21:52:05: <tusho> well, technically it doesn't
2008-08-02.txt:22:37:11: <oerjan> i'm technically subscribed, but only the backup lists are set to deliver
2008-08-06.txt:20:17:48: <tusho> mplayer on windows, while technically possible, is a bit pointless
2008-08-06.txt:22:26:28: <tusho> technically powered by mediawiki but that's irrelevant
2008-08-07.txt:15:14:48: <tusho> and well technically you could do just about anything
2008-08-08.txt:13:42:03: <tusho> oklopol: technically its purpose is to change the topic
2008-08-08.txt:21:00:01: <tusho> technically it isn't a lie
2008-08-08.txt:22:45:57: <ais523> and yes, should go in >, technically speaking there's no need to bother about <
2008-08-10.txt:12:26:23: <tusho> technically they're not valid URIs
2008-08-11.txt:12:09:19: <AnMaster> technically
2008-08-11.txt:12:10:52: <AnMaster> because technically, all it is is a number
2008-08-11.txt:12:29:04: <tusho> technically it's not
2008-08-14.txt:19:33:21: <AnMaster> should technically be possible
2008-08-17.txt:19:22:38: <AnMaster> I guess "no read" technically too, but I can't see the use of that
2008-08-22.txt:15:50:06: <Slereah_> Well, technically
2008-08-24.txt:19:49:00: <MikeRiley> i am a bit confused why mycology has a test to see if SCKE is included in SOCK,,,since technically it should not be....
2008-08-31.txt:00:12:05: <tusho> Additionally: clicking an ad by mistake is technically click fraud
2008-09-16.txt:17:35:46: <ais523> but it's technically speaking usable for programming, if you're very patient
2008-09-16.txt:19:53:57: <AnMaster> technically impossible
2008-09-21.txt:22:45:58: <oerjan> technically, yes
2008-09-26.txt:20:46:43: <Slereah> I think that two elisioned sesses are combined in one, technically
2008-09-27.txt:10:25:58: <Keymaker> but i don't know what the memory is, technically. new values go to end and also when loop begins it takes value from end, but values are removed beginning from left/start
2008-09-27.txt:14:58:19: <oerjan> technically i think i'd've wanted `(',f ',cc) or a direct application
2008-10-01.txt:14:33:09: <tusho> Is technically illegal.
2008-10-01.txt:21:49:30: <oerjan> ais523_: the elder god things are not technically part of it.  but don't let that reassure you.
2008-10-01.txt:23:03:09: <ais523_> AnMaster: technically it's a nomic but its rules rarely change, the nomicness is only used to improve them from time to time
2008-10-01.txt:23:17:54: <ais523_> that's technically gramatically correct
2008-10-03.txt:20:48:51: <oerjan> CO2Games: yeah then you need a tape device, a RAM is not technically enough since the pointer sizes would be bounded too
2008-10-07.txt:17:01:57: <oklocod> oerjan: sat is just 3-sat with larger clauses right? then it's technically not the same, because the gate thing has nested operations and suchamathings.
2008-10-08.txt:17:49:01: <oklocod> there should never be a command that makes technically existing, but practically nonexistant, functionality easier :P
2008-10-08.txt:17:49:30: <oerjan> oklocod: this is not that kind.  this is technically non-existing, so that's fine
2008-10-08.txt:17:49:54: <oklocod> oerjan: well it's technically existing if you have some other representation of a string on the stack
2008-10-10.txt:22:57:51: <ehird> although technically you can do classes
2008-10-10.txt:23:21:21: <ehird> I own the server (a VPS technically), ais523 is sudoer.
2008-10-13.txt:11:54:36: <oklopol> thank you, although that was so obvious i should technically kill everyone of you
2008-10-16.txt:21:11:58: <fizzie> Another style thing: in the "ATHR vs. REFC" the wording, while technically speaking correct, maybe a bit needlessly complicated. The REFC reference numbers don't really matter, so it probably doesn't matter if they're given out first-come-first-served or something stranger, you could just say they're global and need to work without explicit synchronization of requests.
2008-10-17.txt:21:45:01: <fizzie> Some three of the ten "newer nodes" in the CIS cluster only have two of the four cores in use, so I guess there would technically speaking be some room there too.
2008-10-20.txt:22:18:26: <psygnisfive> technically i put it on your stem
2008-10-22.txt:18:17:15: <oklopol> optbot is a baby, technically, as are most bots
2008-10-24.txt:14:02:32: <ais523> AnMaster: that's interesting... I'd argue that doing something that's both utterly unexpected and technically correct is correct behaviour for an ESO pastebin
2008-10-24.txt:14:56:58: <ehird> well, technically you could enter a program that prints inputs
2008-10-27.txt:01:40:21: <psygnisfive> but brain != mind. atleast not technically
2008-11-11.txt:17:44:36: <GregorR> That way they wouldn't be links (technically)!
2008-11-12.txt:17:38:23: <oklopol> but i am technically running, i can show you a vid once i master this.
2008-11-13.txt:14:24:38: <ehird_> Also, technically messing up KDE was my fault, but i'm blaming it on KDE.
2008-11-14.txt:12:27:27: <oklopol> technically i was just "jumping around" before.
2008-11-14.txt:14:54:56: <oklopol> yeah he says "the reader will find this confusing", but that's bullcrap, i'm not talking about "finnish that sounds pretty", i'm just telling you i'm technically right.
2008-11-15.txt:21:34:15: <Slereah_> Also in the logs, technically
2008-11-21.txt:14:19:17: <Slereah_> It can be O anything, technically.
2008-11-27.txt:20:24:12: * oklopol is technically a bastard!
2008-11-27.txt:20:28:32: <AnMaster> technically we all got exactly one asshole too :P
2008-11-28.txt:09:19:44: <Slereah_> Technically, I should need it only for one application.
2008-11-29.txt:13:58:14: <Slereah_> Well, technically, it does.
2008-11-29.txt:19:07:19: <jayCampbell> wasn't that technically a ranged attack?
2008-12-04.txt:21:40:59: <ehird> Although technically I do not have to track them, I feel like I should.
2008-12-05.txt:21:58:07: <ais523> technically speaking?
2008-12-10.txt:15:05:49: <zuff> oklopol: because it technically is
2008-12-16.txt:18:47:26: <zuff> Technically ais523 is a separate person because he's a wikipedia admin and they get death threats and stuff.
2008-12-16.txt:22:12:25: <zuff> also, it's technically down.
2008-12-23.txt:23:12:49: <psygnisfive> which is i suppose technically possible
2008-12-24.txt:14:05:05: <oerjan> technically even here it doesn't start until 5 o'clock iirc
2008-12-25.txt:14:38:01: <AnMaster> ais523|direct, technically it could work at any point during the year
2008-12-30.txt:04:29:25: <Sgeo> Technically, in AW, not an arbitrary number, due to space limitations, but let's ignore that
2008-12-30.txt:04:29:48: <Sgeo> identical objects can technically be distinguished, if the viewer can't see some of them
2009-01-02.txt:19:23:31: <CakeProphet> though technically I'm familiar with C... but I never use it unless someone needs me to.
2009-01-04.txt:16:07:00: <ais523> if a point is so far away it's moving away faster than the speed of light, it's technically outside the universe
2009-01-04.txt:16:08:20: <ais523> Slereah: well, technically, but everything else expands at the same rate too, so it gets smaller compared to all the objects inside it
2009-01-04.txt:16:12:01: <oklopol> Slereah: well technically not, say the universe consisted of cells of some size that was constantly getting bigger
2009-01-04.txt:16:12:21: <ais523> ehird: as for Drizzle, they're taking out all the features that you don't technically have to use in a MySQL database AFAICT
2009-01-09.txt:19:03:01: <Hiato> Hrmm... ok, so fundamentally, technically, it's not cool. Deewiant, do you use it? PS: it does have a much catchier description: a lightweight  and flexible Linux® distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.
2009-01-14.txt:19:57:32: <ais523> which in Perl, is technically compile-time
2009-01-15.txt:19:56:53: <ehird> ok, technically we have purl.org
2009-01-18.txt:16:52:01: <ais523> returning a struct is technically speaking only returning one value
2009-01-18.txt:17:41:16: <ais523> despite it being technically illegal
2009-01-18.txt:17:47:43: <AnMaster> I just had a crazy idea for how to implement an AI that would actually work, it is technically unfeasible though
2009-01-18.txt:17:49:18: <AnMaster> ais523, I said "technically unfeasible"
2009-01-18.txt:17:49:53: <AnMaster> ais523, indeed. I said "technically unfeasible" and "given enough time"
2009-01-21.txt:20:02:57: <oerjan> i mean _technically_ one of them is official, but no one has ever managed to call that rule without using an AI
2009-01-21.txt:21:21:00: <ais523> no, WP:BEANS technically says "Don't tell people not to do something, because they'll be certain to try"
2009-01-21.txt:22:26:21: <oerjan> i supposed technically someone _could_ have mirrored it
2009-01-26.txt:20:43:53: <oklopol> i'm pretty sure "before wp was what it is now" meant wikipedia didn't exist, with the additional "don't make smart-ass comments about it somehow technically existing in some form"
2009-01-27.txt:00:05:30: <ehird> it isn't technically a program as much as a program fragment I cooked up when thinking about concatenative langs for a game engine scripting language
2009-01-31.txt:18:07:05: <oklopol> of course, it seems i technically haven't implemented it anymore, because it doesn't work.
2009-02-01.txt:17:31:49: <oklopol> technically yes.
2009-02-04.txt:17:37:46: <ehird> what's needed is inline asm in haskell. then, technically, it'd be 100% haskell ;-D
2009-02-04.txt:18:36:43: <ehird> ^ despite being technically forbidden, this is the closest type I can get the FFI to output, and gcc accepts it...
2009-02-04.txt:19:02:42: <ehird> technically, I should be doing `hs_add_root(__stginit_Export);` after the hs_init, where __stginit_Export is defined...somewhere, but what the heck
2009-02-05.txt:19:09:07: <ais523> impomatic: technically speaking, it isn't functional, but all writing in it seems to be functional in practice
2009-02-05.txt:19:09:52: <impomatic> So technically speaking, would I need to ad much to make it functional?
2009-02-05.txt:21:05:13: <ais523> technically speaking, strings in a #include can be parsed however the compiler wants
2009-02-05.txt:21:05:39: <ais523> they don't even technically have to refer to filenames, although every compiler I've met does that
2009-02-08.txt:14:57:52: <ais523> ehird: you are aware that "wat" is technically speaking a spelling error?
2009-02-11.txt:17:20:46: <ais523> well, technically prolog is a lisp derivative
2009-02-11.txt:21:46:35: <ehirddit> All my settings and files are technically gone, but I'll fish out what I need from /Previous Systems/.
2009-02-13.txt:08:30:13: <oklofok> i mean, i am technically cs people, but i should probably be math people
2009-02-14.txt:16:09:08: <ehird> technically, it shouldn't have persisted past the upgrade anyway
2009-02-14.txt:16:50:35: <ehird> (technically, the logs are on bespin.org; tunes.org just happens to be hosted on bespin
2009-02-14.txt:16:54:19: <ais523> that isn't even an esolang, technically speaking
2009-02-15.txt:09:20:09: <oerjan> also, that's technically correct only if you count duplicates, in which case it still isn't, should be 2*len(nick)+1
2009-02-18.txt:17:32:30: <ehird> well, technically it stores an integer pointer too.
2009-02-22.txt:22:19:04: <oerjan> ais523: "i call myself", technically
2009-02-24.txt:21:59:57: <oerjan> well i guess technically the Tuesday has the same problem
2009-02-26.txt:00:03:02: <AnMaster> oklopol, talking about Mac OS 6-9 (and probably older ones, but never used them. and yes it is technically System 6, System 7, Mac OS 8, Mac OS 9...)
2009-02-28.txt:20:14:05: <ais523> ehird: I think technically speaking you aren't allowed to do that in C
2009-02-28.txt:23:42:28: <ehird> oerjan: technically, a.s. != autism
2009-03-01.txt:17:02:19: <oklopol> that was interesting, technically, yes, but i mean something that's interesting to play
2009-03-02.txt:14:43:52: <ehird> i think it might be technically correc
2009-03-03.txt:18:32:24: <FireFly> But it looks about as good, technically wise
2009-03-03.txt:22:05:32: <AnMaster> ehird, I don't have the C89 spec. I know it breaks C99 technically
2009-03-05.txt:18:02:41: <ais523> is that, technically speaking, a stack overflow?
2009-03-05.txt:18:16:24: <AnMaster> technically current erlang versions can run out of atoms. But the limit is a few millions iirc, and someone said it will most likely go away in the next major release
2009-03-07.txt:22:13:51: <ehird> bsmntbombdood: technically, 20kb would be enough.
2009-03-08.txt:16:35:57: <AnMaster> ais523, it technically does. That is the effect.
2009-03-08.txt:20:10:20: <ehird> technically
2009-03-08.txt:22:44:45: <ehird> Horrible, evil Scheme code that is technically R5RS compliant.
2009-03-10.txt:15:58:33: <ehird> (isn't it technically troff that does that?)
2009-03-11.txt:23:55:07: <oerjan> mapM_, technically
2009-03-13.txt:19:07:41: <ais523> and nearly all are abandonware, technically that's illegal but nobody but me seems to care
2009-03-13.txt:23:04:32: <mad> I think it's specific to snes technically but in general it refers to effects where you alter registers between lines
2009-03-16.txt:23:37:46: <psygnisfive> technically
2009-03-17.txt:19:19:39: <fizzie> Also in practice, many A/D converters are technically speaking 1-bit, it's just that they have a high enough frequency. And then some stuff to get multi-bit values.
2009-03-18.txt:00:35:20: <oerjan> or wait, that "new" is not technically part of the rules
2009-03-18.txt:14:56:28: <fizzie> Well, I mean, technically speaking I guess I should be learning it. There is an obligatory Swedish exam part of our study curriculum (it's in the law, even), and I thought I'd get it done easier by doing it in course form.
2009-03-20.txt:00:22:24: <oklofok> although i guess that's technically not a good opposite for fun
2009-03-22.txt:17:52:33: <ais523> TAEB takes a lot longer than 1 second to start up, and is technically a script I suppose
2009-03-22.txt:21:05:21: <Slereah_> Technically, the answer should be R
2009-03-23.txt:17:56:32: <AnMaster> I think they are technically incompatible though
2009-03-23.txt:22:12:13: <AnMaster> ehird, yes technically
2009-03-24.txt:19:10:54: <AnMaster> ais523_, I see. So it is technically even simpler to parse?
2009-03-24.txt:19:56:52: <ehird> ais523_: Yes, you're lucky because you have technically competent friends.
2009-03-24.txt:20:05:49: <ehird> Come on, you can't seriously believe people are that technically competent.
2009-03-26.txt:16:32:29: <ais523> ehird: I thought abandonware was a term for things that were technically illegal, but that nobody cared enough to sue about
2009-03-27.txt:23:41:01: <AnMaster> also I know technically how you do it, I can manage short and not to steep hills fine. and I know how you put your foots. never let the tips drift apart too much for example.
2009-03-29.txt:23:26:16: <oerjan> well technically the car parts would probably fall off because the view out is so lousy you cannot avoid bumping into things
2009-03-30.txt:23:25:16: <fizzie> But I have even more -doc packages: autobook (well, technically that's not -doc), autoconf-doc, automake1.9-doc, gcc-4.1-doc, gcc-4.3-doc, gcc-doc-base, gdb-doc, ocaml-doc.
2009-04-01.txt:22:47:23: <ais523> my C-INTERCAL is technically a fork, but because the original had been discontinued for years it became the de-facto official version
2009-04-01.txt:23:11:55: <ais523> technically speaking, I'm an engineer
2009-04-02.txt:16:48:11: <ehird> yes, it's technically correct
2009-04-02.txt:16:48:38: <ehird> llback, and much more. We also pride ourselves in having technically competent support staff based in our UK offices.
2009-04-02.txt:16:51:58: <Slereah> Well, technically, it's correct
2009-04-03.txt:21:45:43: <ehird> Pac-Man technically has no ending—as long as the player keeps at least one life, they should be able to continue playing indefinitely. However, because of a bug in the routine that draws the fruit, the right side of the 256th level becomes a garbled mess of text and symbols, rendering the level impossible to pass by legitimate means. Normally, no more than seven fruits are displayed at any one time, but when the internal level counter (stored in a sing
[too many lines; stopping]