view paste/paste.20219 @ 12257:1924fe176291 draft

<fizzie> ` sed -e \'s|wisdom|bin|\' < ../bin/cwlprits > ../bin/cblprits; chmod a+x ../bin/cblprits
author HackEso <hackeso@esolangs.org>
date Sat, 07 Dec 2019 23:36:53 +0000
parents bd83d7419ad6
children
line wrap: on
line source

2009-01-09.txt:17:50:11: <AnMaster> ehird, well I'd assume only one would do the drawing bit, to make it consistent, and so on. If not he is some sort of super-productive multi-skilled genius...
2009-03-31.txt:22:04:36: <AnMaster> foo*bar is multiplication, foo**bar then? what is that? multiplying a dereferenced pointer I would assume, but that is certainly confusing. There is only one valid way to interpret it but still
2009-06-10.txt:19:20:27: <fizzie> I assume some sort of "there can be only one" swordfight is involved.
2009-09-04.txt:17:46:25: <AnMaster> but I would assume I'm the only one still using a PS/2 keyboard
2010-03-02.txt:21:50:02: <alise> You assume there is only one format per single type.
2010-03-09.txt:23:12:54: <ais523> I somehow assumed that you'd capture with only one point left
2011-04-17.txt:20:44:21: <olsner> I think they can assume you're the only one playing the game at that time - if anything gets hacked anywhere it's obviously you who did it :)
2011-10-22.txt:22:40:19: <bd_> there's too much code that assumes there's only one player though
2011-12-27.txt:18:40:45: <colloinkgravisom> If you assume only one family exists at any given time.
2011-12-27.txt:18:41:47: <colloinkgravisom> (a) Yeah, but the best impossible things are possible things! (b) So you WANT to assume only one family is alive in the entire world for any given generation?
2012-09-24.txt:15:26:36: <atriq> That I'm annoyed that people assume there's only one kind of sign language
2012-09-24.txt:15:31:07: <itidus21> i get this from the first 2 lines annoyed_by(annoyed_by(people assume there's only one kind of sign language))