Mercurial > repo
comparison paste/paste.27098 @ 4074:f6976ec7b9c2
<int-e> pastelogs int-e> .*:[)]
author | HackBot |
---|---|
date | Sat, 23 Nov 2013 00:29:31 +0000 |
parents | |
children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
4073:4f155c296cbb | 4074:f6976ec7b9c2 |
---|---|
1 2005-07-26.txt:04:17:10: <int-e> I know. But I get user 0m2.131s for (my) bf2c then gcc and user 0m19.108s for bff :) | |
2 2005-07-26.txt:06:45:01: <int-e> :) | |
3 2005-07-26.txt:07:06:30: <int-e> ok, BF2C is boring :) | |
4 2005-07-26.txt:07:14:34: <int-e> yep, but not too bad either :) | |
5 2005-07-26.txt:07:25:41: <int-e> good luck :) | |
6 2005-07-26.txt:16:32:26: <int-e> BAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAAB prints a single A :) | |
7 2005-07-26.txt:18:15:06: <int-e> done :) | |
8 2005-07-26.txt:19:18:34: <int-e> XYYYYYYYYYYYYYXYYYYYX works too :) | |
9 2005-07-26.txt:20:12:02: <int-e> I was going to say: Gimme a spec. :) | |
10 2005-07-27.txt:12:31:12: <int-e> :) | |
11 2005-07-27.txt:12:39:56: <int-e> I could stop any moment :) | |
12 2005-07-27.txt:15:54:27: <int-e> do you know programming languages where (: and :) are language tokens? | |
13 2005-07-27.txt:21:09:46: <int-e> oh found another sun with gcc 3.4.2 :) | |
14 2005-07-27.txt:21:15:25: <int-e> I know :) | |
15 2005-07-27.txt:21:17:42: <int-e> :) | |
16 2005-07-27.txt:23:18:43: <int-e> AAAAAAAAAAARGH :) | |
17 2005-07-28.txt:00:40:26: <int-e> enough for all practical purposes, as I said :) | |
18 2005-07-28.txt:00:42:31: <int-e> graue, but 2^256 is close to that :) | |
19 2005-07-28.txt:00:50:37: <int-e> 0 is represented as 0 :) | |
20 2005-07-28.txt:01:10:14: <int-e> a machine should not run esolangs for any serious work :) | |
21 2005-07-29.txt:00:04:15: <int-e> well at least it works :) | |
22 2005-07-29.txt:00:50:13: <int-e> is valid :) | |
23 2005-08-01.txt:18:52:45: <int-e> aaaaaaaaaah :) | |
24 2005-08-01.txt:23:56:13: <int-e> it looks ugly :) | |
25 2005-08-05.txt:22:53:41: <int-e> hey, apparently that predecessor thingy was created by me, I even got credit :) | |
26 2005-08-06.txt:00:01:11: <int-e> :) | |
27 2005-08-06.txt:00:02:21: <int-e> that happens to me, too - but when I'm using a de layout keyboard :) | |
28 2005-08-10.txt:23:17:56: <int-e> :) | |
29 2005-08-10.txt:23:35:30: <int-e> It's only visible in strong magical fields. (Read some Terry Pratchett :) | |
30 2005-08-10.txt:23:36:23: <int-e> jix, it's pronounced 'red', but it's spelled 'read' :) | |
31 2005-08-10.txt:23:36:55: <int-e> :) | |
32 2005-08-11.txt:00:52:08: <int-e> :) | |
33 2005-08-16.txt:00:20:06: <int-e> :) | |
34 2005-08-16.txt:00:20:43: <int-e> :) | |
35 2005-08-17.txt:23:01:55: <int-e> and bsf :) | |
36 2005-08-24.txt:03:46:56: <int-e> it's voila :) | |
37 2005-08-31.txt:07:55:36: <int-e> :) | |
38 2005-12-03.txt:11:28:02: <int-e> well, do that two more times :) | |
39 2005-12-04.txt:11:43:17: <int-e> Keymaker: I chiseled off another 14 bytes from my entry last night :) | |
40 2005-12-04.txt:11:58:07: <int-e> that's a magical number :) | |
41 2005-12-04.txt:12:56:26: <int-e> and I wonder why I'm getting Cell value too small (-1) errors :) | |
42 2005-12-07.txt:13:48:07: <int-e> you might like this :) | |
43 2005-12-07.txt:14:03:10: <int-e> python quine :) | |
44 2006-01-12.txt:22:11:02: <int-e> | is really cool - in programs that don't do I/O :) | |
45 2006-01-12.txt:22:25:30: <int-e> then I'd claim that my C one is faster :) | |
46 2006-01-12.txt:22:32:23: <int-e> even for insanely call/cc-ing programs like quine12.unl :) (that's the one where mandelson-unlambda does so poorly) | |
47 2006-01-12.txt:22:44:44: <int-e> I should have thought of that :) | |
48 2006-01-12.txt:22:48:25: <int-e> ah, neat. then ``c`cc`c`r`.o`.o`.f`cc prints 'foo' over and over :) | |
49 2006-01-12.txt:22:54:17: <int-e> it can eat a lot of memory and run into infinite loops :) | |
50 2006-01-12.txt:23:33:15: <int-e> :) | |
51 2006-01-12.txt:23:36:02: <int-e> I think I got it. Luckily I kept the corresponding lambda terms around :) | |
52 2006-01-13.txt:00:08:44: <int-e> [[<]?] or [?[<]] :) | |
53 2006-01-13.txt:00:41:50: <int-e> ihope: nnn:@[>>[>]@[<]<]>[>.] ... this or something similar like that should print nnn digits :) | |
54 2006-01-29.txt:02:24:05: <int-e> the result is .c :) | |
55 2006-02-24.txt:02:16:44: <int-e> if your program contains ][, you're doing something wrong :) | |
56 2006-02-24.txt:20:14:34: <int-e> d'oh :) | |
57 2006-02-24.txt:20:21:51: <int-e> well, of course not :) | |
58 2006-02-24.txt:20:31:05: <int-e> right, you broke them :) | |
59 2006-02-24.txt:20:51:34: <int-e> I just didn't think of it :) | |
60 2006-02-25.txt:01:33:22: <int-e> you're mistaken. :) | |
61 2006-02-25.txt:01:55:12: <int-e> the first column are powers of two though :) | |
62 2006-02-25.txt:14:17:46: <int-e> dangit. :) | |
63 2006-02-25.txt:14:25:56: <int-e> but ... +[,[>++++<-],>[<++++++++>-]<.[-]+] is shorter :) | |
64 2006-02-25.txt:14:44:58: <int-e> I can do that :) | |
65 2006-02-25.txt:14:53:57: <int-e> :) | |
66 2006-03-05.txt:17:49:47: <int-e> sorry, just testing :) | |
67 2006-03-05.txt:17:54:07: <int-e> etaoinshrdlu :) | |
68 2006-03-05.txt:17:59:13: <int-e> maybe digits should not be allowed :) | |
69 2006-03-22.txt:21:13:21: <int-e> :) | |
70 2006-03-22.txt:21:18:44: <int-e> you get the idea :) | |
71 2006-03-22.txt:21:43:38: <int-e> the really funny thing is that this program worked the first time that I tried it :) | |
72 2006-03-22.txt:22:04:40: <int-e> :) | |
73 2006-10-05.txt:23:02:20: <int-e> (the txtgen code :) | |
74 2013-11-10.txt:01:03:21: <int-e> I forgot how icky that programming language (Unlambda) really is :) | |
75 2013-11-10.txt:11:33:02: <int-e> then it's not x86 :) | |
76 2013-11-10.txt:11:33:49: <int-e> x86 is certainly big enough for a UTM, given the right peripheral(s) :) | |
77 2013-11-10.txt:21:20:17: <int-e> I'm running it. Elliot more or less talked me into taking over. :) | |
78 2013-11-10.txt:21:21:47: <int-e> That's probably because I'm blissfully unaware of that channel :) | |
79 2013-11-11.txt:14:15:31: <int-e> ais523_: I did, but I didn't really think about it :) | |
80 2013-11-11.txt:14:16:07: <int-e> boily: I've been here before, but this time lambdabot dragged me here :) | |
81 2013-11-11.txt:14:17:23: <int-e> my most notable intercal accomplishment is a rot13 filter (50 lines without using standard library.) ... and without comments :) | |
82 2013-11-11.txt:19:54:50: <int-e> wisdom probability density function ... nice concept :) | |
83 2013-11-11.txt:21:09:11: <int-e> nooodl: I believe I've even used 'tac' once or twice ... :) | |
84 2013-11-11.txt:21:12:28: <int-e> the GNU 'tac' has a tac_seekable function, which hopefully does something clever :) | |
85 2013-11-11.txt:21:35:25: <int-e> Vorpal: but that's a small excuse for not noting that 512*24 is quite far from 22880 :) | |
86 2013-11-11.txt:22:13:41: <int-e> mouse in the middle :) | |
87 2013-11-11.txt:22:46:36: <int-e> fizzie: it didn't :) | |
88 2013-11-11.txt:22:52:50: <int-e> apparently, mentioning C++ no longer reduces one's karma (it did that for a while when karma was new) :) | |
89 2013-11-11.txt:22:55:16: <int-e> nooodl_: no, C++ was special-cased :) | |
90 2013-11-11.txt:23:09:08: <int-e> fun, I expected more than 4 draws (and fewer wins) :) | |
91 2013-11-11.txt:23:16:56: <int-e> ok, I'll stop there :) | |
92 2013-11-11.txt:23:18:23: <int-e> +. is a real suicide :) | |
93 2013-11-11.txt:23:26:55: <oerjan> <int-e> In any case, the most impressive Intercal program I know about is Ørjan's unlambda interpretet ( http://home.nvg.org/~oerjan/esoteric/intercal/ ) <-- :)) | |
94 2013-11-12.txt:18:19:14: <int-e> Just don't uninstall libacl when coreutils are using it :) (that's about the worst I did, back when I was using Gentoo. I still compile the occasional kernel though, and a ton of Haskell stuff.) | |
95 2013-11-12.txt:18:20:16: <int-e> arch has binary packages :) | |
96 2013-11-12.txt:20:40:52: <int-e> and in any case, *I* killed it :) | |
97 2013-11-13.txt:15:48:07: <int-e> but it should still die with the virtual machine :) | |
98 2013-11-13.txt:15:57:08: <int-e> I forgot how hard to kill that : | : thing is ... now one reboot later :) | |
99 2013-11-13.txt:19:51:41: <int-e> ah so that's what this does :) | |
100 2013-11-13.txt:20:01:43: <int-e> better than apathy :) | |
101 2013-11-13.txt:20:11:04: <int-e> ais523: probably, if I wanted to do something not-so-stupid :) | |
102 2013-11-16.txt:22:58:39: <int-e> maybe I should pick a different name for my test bot :) | |
103 2013-11-17.txt:01:42:31: <int-e> @let fibs = fix ((0:) . scanl (+) 1) | |
104 2013-11-17.txt:12:04:18: <int-e> oh :) | |
105 2013-11-17.txt:17:55:03: <int-e> takes a cycle :) | |
106 2013-11-18.txt:13:09:09: <int-e> ok, I guess it's just too weird to really believe :) | |
107 2013-11-19.txt:16:47:19: <int-e> even flags are defined :) | |
108 2013-11-19.txt:16:48:26: <int-e> In any case, those processor manuals are the right place to look up such information :) | |
109 2013-11-19.txt:16:49:29: <int-e> (rflags is essentially set to 0, but there's a reserved bit that is forced to be 1 :) ) | |
110 2013-11-19.txt:16:58:21: <int-e> so 65280. darn :) | |
111 2013-11-19.txt:16:59:55: <int-e> that said, I'm not sure whether .stack is allowed in the .tiny model :) It's been a while ... | |
112 2013-11-19.txt:17:11:35: <int-e> fs: is used for thread-local storage :) | |
113 2013-11-20.txt:21:53:32: <int-e> It's so unfair :) | |
114 2013-11-20.txt:22:03:51: <int-e> funny. google for "�" says it matches no pages. duckduckgo displays a picture of an elephant. duckduckgo won that round :) | |
115 2013-11-20.txt:22:06:11: <int-e> not sure whether that's lawful, but it doesn't get any more neutral :) | |
116 2013-11-21.txt:22:55:45: <int-e> oerjan: nothing. I'm adding default (Integer,Double) so your @let will hopefully stop working :) | |
117 2013-11-21.txt:22:57:56: <int-e> oerjan: yes, I added () there, too. thanks for the hint :) | |
118 2013-11-21.txt:23:26:51: <int-e> it's a bit annoying to have to restart lambdabot just because of an extra flag. oh well :) | |
119 2013-11-21.txt:23:29:57: <int-e> oerjan: thanks :) | |
120 2013-11-22.txt:19:23:02: <int-e> (maybe they didn't appreciate money back then? :) ) | |
121 2013-11-22.txt:20:55:41: <int-e> (convert 0 <= al <= 15 to 0123456789ABCDEF ASCII:) cmp al, 10; sbb al, 69h; das | |
122 2013-11-22.txt:21:59:11: <int-e> b_jonas: see also the part after the ellipsis :) | |
123 2013-11-22.txt:22:02:42: <int-e> it's a terminal, which emulates a printer :) | |
124 2013-11-22.txt:22:29:45: <int-e> Even for x86, I should've written "near call" there :) | |
125 2013-11-22.txt:22:59:08: <int-e> confused that with inc/dec :) | |
126 2013-11-22.txt:23:01:16: <int-e> But there's no place for a 'test' in there :) | |
127 2013-11-22.txt:23:22:30: <int-e> Slereah: 256 bytes of addressable code wouldn't be enough or most purposes :) | |
128 2013-11-22.txt:23:35:18: <int-e> writing bad assembly code has been automated :) | |
129 2013-11-22.txt:23:48:51: <int-e> ais523: I expected 0.0 :) | |
130 2013-11-23.txt:00:02:17: <int-e> ais523: I bet -Os is not the primary focus of the gcc developers :) | |
131 2013-11-23.txt:00:11:23: <int-e> ais523: anyway, I'm not opposed to writing assembly code, but there should be a good reason :) | |
132 2013-11-23.txt:00:11:45: <int-e> fizzie: well, they don't :) |