Mercurial > repo
comparison paste/paste.1949 @ 3892:b04daab6cdc1
<oerjan> pastelogs recurisve
| author | HackBot |
|---|---|
| date | Mon, 07 Oct 2013 22:14:54 +0000 |
| parents | |
| children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 3891:87db16a2e2bd | 3892:b04daab6cdc1 |
|---|---|
| 1 2012-12-13.txt:06:38:35: <Fiora> but isn't the idea of tail call elimination that you just optimize a recurisve function into a loop via code transformation? so like, the function doesn't exist anymore kinda | |
| 2 2013-10-07.txt:19:15:13: <fungot> boily: every procedure returns a recurisve procedure. http://www.kendyck.com/ 2005/ 02/15-feb-2005 the scsh manual is?! | |
| 3 2013-10-07.txt:19:17:56: <tswett> I'd love to see the origin of "every procedure returns a recurisve procedure". | |
| 4 2013-10-07.txt:19:18:28: <tswett> Search for "recurisve procedure", man. | |
| 5 2013-10-07.txt:19:18:30: <Bike> "every procedure returns" and "returns a recurisve procedure" massed up. | |
| 6 2013-10-07.txt:19:19:18: <tswett> Yeah, but what sorts of things return recurisve procedures? | |
| 7 2013-10-07.txt:19:19:45: <Bike> https://www.google.com/search?q=recurisve this misspelling is more common than i thought. | |
| 8 2013-10-07.txt:19:19:53: <tswett> I guess you could say that the Y combinator returns a recurisve procedure. But we wouldn't call it a procedure. | |
| 9 2013-10-07.txt:19:21:33: <tswett> Like, since it's a "procedure", that seems to imply that it's an actual piece of computer code. A recurisve one, to boot. But what sort of thing would specifically return a piece of recurisve code, rather than just any type of code? Not a compiler. Usually. | |
| 10 2013-10-07.txt:19:23:24: <Bike> recurisve* | |
| 11 2013-10-07.txt:22:14:32: <oerjan> `pastelogs recurisve |