|
0
|
1 2003-07-30.txt:20:52:24: <Taaus> Just make it output Lilypond code ;)
|
|
|
2 2003-07-30.txt:20:53:06: <lament> except i couldn't install lilypond last time i tried
|
|
|
3 2003-07-30.txt:20:53:49: <Taaus> Yes. Using Lilypond.
|
|
|
4 2003-07-30.txt:21:05:11: <lament> of course lilypond is also affected by similar cuteness
|
|
|
5 2003-07-30.txt:21:06:44: <Taaus> Not quite.. Lilypond isn't _restricted_ to major/minor... It just has good definitions to start with... A _lot_ of music is either in the major or minor mode.
|
|
|
6 2007-07-15.txt:00:55:49: <pikhq> Figs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
|
|
|
7 2007-07-18.txt:05:57:15: <pikhq> Figs: Just learn LilyPond syntax, and get some really, *really* good typeset sheet music.
|
|
|
8 2007-07-18.txt:05:58:16: <Figs> LilyPond doesn't do playback though, does it?
|
|
|
9 2009-02-17.txt:21:53:28: <lament> *lilypond
|
|
|
10 2009-09-28.txt:06:46:05: <Gregor> (And, by proxy, lilypond)
|
|
|
11 2010-01-19.txt:02:56:31: <Gregor> Lilypond
|
|
|
12 2010-01-19.txt:02:56:37: <Gregor> Rosegarden to generate the Lilypond
|
|
|
13 2010-01-19.txt:02:58:25: <Gregor> (Lilypond, if you don't know, is TeX for musical notation)
|
|
|
14 2010-01-19.txt:03:02:04: <pikhq> I could've sworn Lilypond was smarter than that.
|
|
|
15 2010-01-19.txt:03:03:57: <pikhq> Maybe you could get the Lilypond developers to use Opus 10 for the stuff to fix in Lilypond? :P
|
|
|
16 2010-05-16.txt:01:12:13: <alise> pikhq: *LilyPond.
|
|
|
17 2010-06-26.txt:01:58:39: <alise> lilypond is pretty
|
|
|
18 2010-06-26.txt:01:59:01: <Gregor> alise: All that I have sheet music of is lilypondized.
|
|
|
19 2010-08-13.txt:17:36:03: <Gregor-W> (UNRELATED) It amuses me that LilyPond's motto is "Music notation for everyone"
|
|
|
20 2010-08-13.txt:17:37:22: <alise> cpressey: Uh, LilyPond is excellent.
|
|
|
21 2010-08-13.txt:17:37:32: <Gregor-W> cpressey: LilyPond is fucking amazing.
|
|
|
22 2010-08-13.txt:17:37:58: <alise> I don't do music, but if I did, fuck yeah, LilyPond. Extremely high-quality typesetting of musical notation, no fucking with stupid GUIs.
|
|
|
23 2010-08-13.txt:17:38:46: <Gregor-W> Yeah. I've gotten used Rosegarden. It's not great ... I actually output LilyPond from Rosegarden, then make changes to that. To keep that maintainable I keep the whole thing in an hg repo with the original and modified in different branches X_X
|
|
|
24 2010-08-13.txt:17:39:44: <Gregor-W> It's basically just sufficient to allow me to input from MIDI, then output LilyPond :P
|
|
|
25 2010-08-13.txt:23:17:43: <alise> {OGG, MP3, FLAC, DPR, DPR-pedal} and {PDF, Rosegarden, LilyPond}
|
|
|
26 2010-08-13.txt:23:18:44: <alise> PDF first for notation since most people just want to take a look, Rosegarden for the tinkerers, and LilyPond for people who want to criticise your source code.
|
|
|
27 2010-09-10.txt:05:14:50: <Gregor> Yeah, that's a bit of a Lilypond anomaly ...
|
|
|
28 2010-09-11.txt:02:03:47: <Gregor> http://codu.org/tmp/GRegor-op13-mov2-wipp7.pdf I've gotten too notationally clever, and Lilypond doesn't like me for it.
|
|
|
29 2010-09-12.txt:05:21:42: <alise> TeX but with music -- you mean LilyPond.
|
|
|
30 2010-10-12.txt:06:12:10: <catseye> i'm surprised lilypond can do that
|
|
|
31 2010-10-12.txt:06:42:54: <Gregor> quintopia: Rosegarden to lilypond, then fixes over that lilypond.
|
|
|
32 2010-11-13.txt:22:27:30: <zzo38> Does Lilypond not produce DVI output? And it works with LaTeX, it won't work with Plain TeX?
|
|
|
33 2010-11-13.txt:22:32:02: <zzo38> That is the problem, how many things GNU Lilypond requirement for compiling (and for running, too), and yet it won't make proper DVI files.
|
|
|
34 2010-11-13.txt:22:32:25: <elliott> zzo38: Lilypond isn't LaTeX or TeX.
|
|
|
35 2010-11-13.txt:22:33:58: <zzo38> And it has a lot of requirements http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-program/Requirements#Requirements
|
|
|
36 2011-01-27.txt:05:29:42: <zzo38> Gregor: Maybe you should write more music, write John Stump style music. Probably GNU Lilypond can do that.
|
|
|
37 2011-01-27.txt:05:30:02: <Gregor> GNU Lilypond can't write music :P
|
|
|
38 2011-01-27.txt:05:30:20: <zzo38> You can use GNU Lilypond for writing music.
|
|
|
39 2011-01-27.txt:05:30:45: <Gregor> You can use GNU Lilypond for /notating/ music.
|
|
|
40 2011-01-27.txt:05:30:57: <zzo38> Your files are in GNU Lilypond, that's what I saw, I think.
|
|
|
41 2011-01-27.txt:05:32:01: <zzo38> Then make a John Stump style music and notate it with GNU Lilypond.
|
|
|
42 2011-01-27.txt:05:32:45: <zzo38> I read that DVI files created with Lilypond will not contain note heads. Is that right? If so, that is a serious problem.
|
|
|
43 2011-01-29.txt:07:49:23: <pikhq> I do hope that someday Lilypond will be able to typeset Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz, and Strin Quartet No. 556(b) for Strings In A Minor (Motoring Accident).
|
|
|
44 2011-12-28.txt:09:48:41: <HackEgo> 2010-01-19.txt:02:58:25: <Gregor> (Lilypond, if you don't know, is TeX for musical notation)
|
|
|
45 2011-12-28.txt:09:54:00: <itidus21> `pastelogs lilypond
|
