|
0
|
1 2006-07-25.txt:04:36:51: <pikhq> !bf_txtgen Cxu vi parolas Esperanton?
|
|
|
2 2006-07-25.txt:04:37:23: <Razor-X> It's Esperanto generation is HORRIBLE!
|
|
|
3 2006-07-28.txt:22:01:12: <Razor-X> pikhq: Bonvolu vidus http://www.esperanto.mv.ru/ESP/literaturo.html .
|
|
|
4 2006-07-28.txt:22:02:15: <pikhq> Mia Esperanto estas malbona. :'(
|
|
|
5 2006-07-28.txt:22:04:37: <lament> Esperanto is for doofii
|
|
|
6 2006-07-28.txt:22:06:50: <nooga> esperanto?
|
|
|
7 2006-07-28.txt:22:08:16: <nooga> Polish is 180 degrees from Esperanto ;p
|
|
|
8 2006-07-28.txt:22:08:58: <lament> esperanto is really ugly :(
|
|
|
9 2006-07-28.txt:22:24:57: <lament> Razor-X: TP has several words taken from English, and several from Esperanto, so should be even easier
|
|
|
10 2006-08-06.txt:03:59:34: <Razor-X> I speak Esperanto, Bengali, and French too, if you consider French a language.
|
|
|
11 2006-08-06.txt:04:01:25: <RodgerTheGreat> I don't consider french a language worth knowing- I can't imagine it would grant me entrance to anything worthwhile. Japanese is quite useful on the internet, and I imagine that Esperanto might come in handy if you ever choose to create a "utopian society" or something.
|
|
|
12 2006-08-06.txt:04:02:15: <Razor-X> The nifty thing about Esperanto is that, there's always a speaker of some small language or another who can also speak Esperanto, which often means you'll get Esperanto translations.
|
|
|
13 2006-08-06.txt:04:02:53: <pikhq> Esperanto is also nice for stifling boredom (just like Esolangs)
|
|
|
14 2006-08-06.txt:04:03:12: <RodgerTheGreat> one could also argue that learning Esperanto could make the languages it was based on more accessible, but if similarity to other languages is key, English is king.
|
|
|
15 2006-08-06.txt:04:03:39: <RodgerTheGreat> Esperanto is one of the closest things to a human esolang.
|
|
|
16 2006-08-06.txt:04:06:31: <pikhq> A: Any noun. Ba: Any verb. Ca: Any adjective. Da: Any adverb. Ga: Any punctuation. Gxa: any curse word (all pronounced as though in Esperanto)
|
|
|
17 2006-08-06.txt:04:12:41: <Razor-X> What does that have to do with Esperanto? It's structure is more variable than English's structure, and also, you got cut off after ``doesn't play well to n'' .
|
|
|
18 2006-08-06.txt:04:13:28: <Razor-X> When I speak in Esperanto, I omit explicit the subject, which is something I've picked up from Japanese and Bengali.
|
|
|
19 2006-08-06.txt:04:14:26: <Razor-X> That's what I love about Esperanto. It's very free in its sentence structure.
|
|
|
20 2006-08-06.txt:04:15:05: <Razor-X> When did we say Esperanto doesen't change?
|
|
|
21 2006-08-06.txt:04:16:17: <Razor-X> In the days of Esperanto's inception, people would call an American ``Usonanto'' now they're called ``Usono'' because of change in the use of suffixes. A verb common in Esperanto in the beginning was ``opinii'' -- to opine (to have an opinion about), that word has since dropped in favor of ``pensi'' -- to think.
|
|
|
22 2006-08-06.txt:04:17:30: <Razor-X> Another one is, in the inception of Esperanto, ĉi tie was used to mean ``here''. It's been superseded by ``tie ĉi'', but I still prefer ``ĉi tie''.
|
|
|
23 2006-08-06.txt:04:25:34: <Razor-X> There's also been shifts in the language because of the feminist movement. Male conjugations of occupations (like proffesor, and such, which are Esperanto's default forms) would mean specifically male. It's come to mean a person of both genders now.
|
|
|
24 2006-08-09.txt:17:45:52: <pikhq> Woohoo! I understood Razor's Esperanto!
|
|
|
25 2006-08-11.txt:03:53:13: <Razor-X> Esperanto, French, Japanese, Bengali, English -- I can survive pretty much in most places of the world.
|
|
|
26 2006-08-24.txt:22:23:45: <Razor-X> Esperanto.
|
|
|
27 2006-08-24.txt:22:42:37: <Razor-X> Esperanto, not Espanol.
|
|
|
28 2006-08-24.txt:22:46:37: <Razor-X> I know only enough French to translate Wikipedia articles to English, Esperanto, and Japanese though, not that I'm too sad.
|
|
|
29 2006-08-26.txt:01:32:32: <pikhq> ihope: Ne. Esperanto.
|
|
|
30 2006-08-26.txt:01:33:02: <pikhq> Zamenhoff is the guy *responsible* for Esperanto. . . -_-
|
|
|
31 2006-08-26.txt:01:40:15: <Razor-X> But seriously, Zamenhoff's Torah translation uses pretty basic Esperanto.
|
|
|
32 2006-08-26.txt:01:41:09: <pikhq> Well, I'd hope his early stuff used basic Esperanto. . .
|
|
|
33 2006-08-26.txt:01:41:41: <Razor-X> Well, he needn't have restricted himself to *such* basic Esperanto.
|
|
|
34 2006-08-26.txt:01:41:55: <Razor-X> He had already used more poetic Esperanto for his novel translations.
|
|
|
35 2006-08-26.txt:01:50:18: <Razor-X> A lot of the early novel translations sound weird in Esperanto too, which is pathetic :P
|
|
|
36 2006-10-04.txt:00:57:51: <pikhq> Cxu vi parolas Esperanton?
|
|
|
37 2006-10-05.txt:23:53:28: * SimonRC finds out what happens if you write sentances by committee: "Voracious vexillologists believe that the Camelidophobic Esperanto International Association,which is obviously somewhat clever, but technically not very ethical or even subject to the Olympic games of all major holomorphic non-Euclidian institutions of value that are familiar to obsessive ZBBers and recalcitrant anthropomorphic grasshoppers, is concomitantly elucidated, although techni
|
|
|
38 2006-10-23.txt:19:24:57: <GregorR-L> Like Esperanto and Ebonics :P
|
|
|
39 2007-03-14.txt:00:31:01: <lament> sounds esperantoish
|
|
|
40 2007-03-27.txt:02:25:35: <oklopol> that'd be like saying you have to breed your own population of people to be able to create a new esperanto
|
|
|
41 2007-04-05.txt:04:45:58: <Pikhq> En esperanto: Mi estas japana lingva komencanto.
|
|
|
42 2007-04-20.txt:04:44:44: * pikhq does Japanese and Esperanto (to varying degrees of ability)
|
|
|
43 2007-04-20.txt:04:45:58: <Figs> what is the past tense of 'eat' in esperanto?
|
|
|
44 2007-04-20.txt:05:33:10: <pikhq> Kaj mia esperanto ne bonas.
|
|
|
45 2007-04-20.txt:05:35:17: <Figs> "I'm an esperanto newbie, and my esperanto isn't good."?
|
|
|
46 2007-05-31.txt:20:28:35: <Pikhq> Ne, ne, ne! Lernu Esperanton.
|
|
|
47 2007-05-31.txt:20:38:04: <Pikhq> Esperanto bonas por poezio, mi pensas.
|
|
|
48 2007-05-31.txt:20:38:26: <lament> esperanto is terrible simply because of the suffixes :)
|
|
|
49 2007-05-31.txt:20:49:34: <Pikhq> Consider Esperanto. . . And the *class* of languages that have formed around it, the Esperantidons.
|
|
|
50 2007-05-31.txt:20:54:36: <lament> Pikhq: say you have esperanto, it's nice and regular
|
|
|
51 2007-06-18.txt:04:55:49: <pikhq> bsmntbombdood: Esperanto-style grammer, perhaps?
|
|
|
52 2007-06-18.txt:05:40:54: <Sukoshi> Esperanto estas plej bona.
|
|
|
53 2007-06-18.txt:05:41:31: <bsmntbombdood> toki pona has a completely different purpose than esperanto
|
|
|
54 2007-06-18.txt:06:08:03: <pikhq> Sukoshi: Esperanto estas plej bona, sed Toki Pona estas tre simpla lingvon.
|
|
|
55 2007-07-09.txt:03:11:39: <Sukoshi> pikhq: Sed, mi amas lerni Esperanto plej.
|
|
|
56 2007-07-09.txt:03:11:51: <Sukoshi> s/Esperanto/Japanon/
|
|
|
57 2007-07-13.txt:21:25:38: <pikhq> oklokok: Jes; tia lingvo estos Esperanton, mi pensas. ;)
|
|
|
58 2007-07-13.txt:21:27:58: <oklokok> pikhq: esperanto isn't that good, judging by what i've read about it
|
|
|
59 2007-07-16.txt:09:11:40: <pikhq> That wasn't Lojban, that was Esperanto.
|
|
|
60 2007-07-22.txt:04:00:00: <Sukoshi> I'm gonna have to resume Esperanto studies before college, so I can Esperanto-localize everything before I leave, so that nobody can understand my desktop in the off-chance it's unlocked when they are there.
|
|
|
61 2007-07-27.txt:05:32:16: <pikhq> Vi kaj via esperanto. :p
|
|
|
62 2007-08-01.txt:18:00:28: <ihope> Esperanto?
|
|
|
63 2007-08-01.txt:18:01:37: <asiekierka> Ne esperanto, ne esperanto!
|
|
|
64 2007-08-01.txt:18:03:14: <pikhq> asiekierka: Ne. Esperanto bonas.
|
|
|
65 2007-08-07.txt:18:35:20: * pikhq knows English, some Japanese, and some Esperanto
|
|
|
66 2007-08-07.txt:18:36:51: <pikhq> Pretty much, I discovered my grammar was superficially similar to Esperanto, and dropped it at that point.
|
|
|
67 2007-08-19.txt:02:22:05: <Figs> ESPERANTO!
|
|
|
68 2007-08-19.txt:02:22:28: <oklokok> i don't know esperanto, but i don't think it's as good as lojban
|
|
|
69 2007-08-19.txt:02:23:23: <Figs> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto
|
|
|
70 2007-08-19.txt:02:26:07: <oklokok> owns esperanto by a long shot
|
|
|
71 2007-08-19.txt:23:47:48: <oklokok> pikhq: was that esperanto?
|
|
|
72 2007-08-19.txt:23:48:06: <oklokok> esperanto x == lojban x?
|
|
|
73 2007-08-19.txt:23:48:33: <lament> esperanto and lojban are basically the same language!
|
|
|
74 2007-08-19.txt:23:49:20: <pikhq> Basically, a way of ASCIIing the Esperanto circumflexes.
|
|
|
75 2007-08-19.txt:23:52:17: <oklokok> i need to learn esperanto
|
|
|
76 2007-09-10.txt:12:26:09: <Figs> conlangs like esperanto?
|
|
|
77 2007-09-10.txt:12:29:26: <Figs> oklopol: esperanto
|
|
|
78 2007-12-01.txt:07:27:14: <adp10390> Someone please translate this request into Esperanto.
|
|
|
79 2007-12-01.txt:07:32:14: <oerjan> something something cxi tiun something in Esperanton
|
|
|
80 2007-12-01.txt:07:33:03: <oerjan> i _have_ seen esperanto used in here, btw
|
|
|
81 2008-01-27.txt:06:18:14: <pikhq> Esperanto for 'good'.
|
|
|
82 2008-04-04.txt:16:56:38: <ais523> J-INTERCAL supports Esperanto, and CLC-INTERCAL supports Scottish Gaelic, in addition to that list
|
|
|
83 2008-04-04.txt:16:56:59: <ais523> Volapuk was all the rage before Esperanto came along
|
|
|
84 2008-04-19.txt:23:00:35: <UnrelatedToQaz> so Haskell was basically the Esperanto of functional programming languages?
|
|
|
85 2008-04-24.txt:22:59:55: <lament> woohoo, esperanto dictionary lookup
|
|
|
86 2008-04-24.txt:23:44:17: <lament> ehird: i just wanted an esperanto dictionary lookup program. I don't need to write it again. :)
|
|
|
87 2008-04-24.txt:23:51:31: <lament> eo is esperanto
|
|
|
88 2008-04-24.txt:23:52:31: <lament> "eo" is not an esperanto word, so /eo eo is "eo : Not found"
|
|
|
89 2008-04-26.txt:00:39:26: <lament> "Esperanto conferences average 2000 to 3000 participants every year whereas Ido conferences have had anywhere from 13 to 25 participants over the last decade. Each language also has a number of regional conferences during the year on a much less formal basis, and with smaller numbers."
|
|
|
90 2008-04-26.txt:00:41:36: <pikhq> Whereas Esperanto may be averaging a few hundred per smaller conference.
|
|
|
91 2008-04-26.txt:00:44:43: <ehird> Esperanto is lame. I like lojban.
|
|
|
92 2008-04-26.txt:00:44:44: <pikhq> (Esperantido being the family of languages related to Esperanto; the term comes from Esperanto: "Esperantido".)
|
|
|
93 2008-04-26.txt:00:45:25: <lament> i think lojban is far more lame than esperanto.
|
|
|
94 2008-04-26.txt:00:45:50: <lament> esperanto has the goal of allowing people to communicate.
|
|
|
95 2008-04-26.txt:00:46:29: <pikhq> lament: Esperanto is meant as a practical interesting language. Lojban is meant as *just* an interesting language.
|
|
|
96 2008-04-26.txt:01:22:20: <pikhq> Shatner speaks Esperanto with a French accent, for God's sake.
|
|
|
97 2008-04-26.txt:01:23:46: <pikhq> I speak some Esperanto, yes.
|
|
|
98 2008-04-26.txt:01:26:37: * pikhq wonders how the Esperanto in "Red Dwarf" is. . .
|
|
|
99 2008-04-26.txt:01:29:25: <lament> oddly, the (English) wikipedia article on Red Dwarf doesn't mention esperanto at all :)
|
|
|
100 2008-04-26.txt:01:29:35: <lament> (but the esperanto one does)
|
|
|
101 2008-04-26.txt:01:30:25: <pikhq> The Wikipedia page on Esperanto culture, IIRC, mentioned it.
|
|
|
102 2008-04-26.txt:01:31:18: <ehird> pikhq: how about Esperanto and British English, you dork
|
|
|
103 2008-04-26.txt:01:34:06: * pikhq looks at the Japanese article on Esperanto. :p
|
|
|
104 2008-04-26.txt:01:34:45: <lament> Esperanto kaj Brita anglo :)
|
|
|
105 2008-04-26.txt:01:37:12: <pikhq> 4 years, *but* I've only really studied intensively for a few weeks. Do, mia Esperanto ne bonegas.
|
|
|
106 2008-04-26.txt:01:40:56: <pikhq> Amusing; the Japanese Esperanto article has a section on words Esperanto borrows from Japanese.
|
|
|
107 2008-04-28.txt:02:22:34: <lament> one of the example sentences in this online Esperanto course is "to share a wife with your neighbour". Wtf?
|
|
|
108 2008-04-28.txt:02:37:47: <calamari> http://www.esperanto.pl/page.php?tid=102020
|
|
|
109 2008-04-28.txt:23:45:02: <sauxdado> ehird_: it's a cool esperanto word. I'm learning esperanto.
|
|
|
110 2008-04-28.txt:23:47:32: <pikhq> Vi parolas Esperanton...
|
|
|
111 2008-05-12.txt:03:09:43: <pikhq> It ain't Esperanto.
|
|
|
112 2008-05-12.txt:03:10:18: <lament> but perhaps it's Old Esperanto.
|
|
|
113 2008-05-12.txt:03:10:49: <pikhq> Zamenhof's early Esperanto was actually pretty close to the modern language.
|
|
|
114 2008-06-02.txt:15:01:16: <Sgeo> Cxu vi parolas esperanton?
|
|
|
115 2008-06-02.txt:15:01:30: <Sgeo> Kiu parolas esperanton?
|
|
|
116 2008-06-02.txt:15:02:29: <Sgeo> oklopol, cxu vi parolas esperanton?
|
|
|
117 2008-06-02.txt:15:02:48: <Sgeo> In Soviet Russia, vin parolas esperanto!
|
|
|
118 2008-06-02.txt:15:04:40: <oklopol> i thought esperanto would parola me in soviet russia
|
|
|
119 2008-06-02.txt:15:05:44: <Sgeo> That's what vin parolas esperanto means
|
|
|
120 2008-06-02.txt:15:07:01: <Sgeo> so vi parolas esperanton means you speak Esperanto, and vin parolas esperanto means Esperanto speaks you
|
|
|
121 2008-06-02.txt:15:07:59: <pikhq> Mi parolas esperanton, sed mia esperanto estas malbone. . .
|
|
|
122 2008-06-02.txt:15:08:16: <pikhq> I'd tend to say "Esperanto parolas vin", BTW.
|
|
|
123 2008-06-22.txt:18:54:16: <tusho> *esperanto
|
|
|
124 2008-07-20.txt:04:21:44: <pikhq> (It's also fairly natural in Esperanto, FWIW)
|
|
|
125 2008-10-08.txt:06:19:40: <oerjan> ^totallyevil Esperanto
|
|
|
126 2008-10-30.txt:18:20:25: <lament> sounds like esperanto
|
|
|
127 2008-12-22.txt:03:34:20: <CakeProphet> Well, I suppose we could design other types of languages as well. Let's design esperanto... oh wait.
|
|
|
128 2008-12-22.txt:03:36:06: <Warrigal> "Esperanto has already been designed."
|
|
|
129 2009-04-11.txt:19:42:42: <Gracenotes> ESPERANTO IS THE ONLY WAY, MAN
|
|
|
130 2009-04-12.txt:02:12:23: <kerlo> Pronounce the s-with-circumflex as in Esperanto, the e-with-acute as in French, and the e-with-macron as in Wiktionary's enPR.
|
|
|
131 2009-04-30.txt:01:08:22: <psygnisfive> OH GOD ESPERANTO
|
|
|
132 2009-05-01.txt:02:32:13: <kerlo> Wow, someone said a sentence in Esperanto I can understand.
|
|
|
133 2009-05-01.txt:02:32:37: <oklofog> and oh that was esperanto
|
|
|
134 2009-05-01.txt:02:33:44: <pikhq> Also, I need to study my Esperanto. ;)
|
|
|
135 2009-05-05.txt:23:24:26: <kerlo> Hmm, I wonder if I can find an Esperanto keyboard layout.
|
|
|
136 2009-05-05.txt:23:26:26: <kerlo> Too bad Esperanto is something like the only language with those characters.
|
|
|
137 2009-05-05.txt:23:27:03: <ais523> kerlo: look at the Esperanto Wikipedia, they have their own format for writing Esperanto in
|
|
|
138 2009-05-05.txt:23:31:19: <ais523> I don't know Esperanto, so I've never bothered to learn how to write in the Esperanto Wikipedia
|
|
|
139 2009-05-23.txt:18:06:09: <Nenie> it's esperanto for never, since it would never win a game
|
|
|
140 2009-06-01.txt:20:58:36: <pikhq> ehird: Easy, compared to some Esperanto tonguetwisters.
|
|
|
141 2009-06-01.txt:21:11:06: <pikhq> ehird: So, Esperanto phoneme-grapheme mapping.
|
|
|
142 2009-06-09.txt:01:17:40: * warrie looks at Sgeo's Esperanto game.
|
|
|
143 2009-06-09.txt:01:17:46: <Sgeo> It's not Esperanto
|
|
|
144 2009-06-17.txt:19:25:09: * Kial vi ne parolas Esperanton?
|
|
|
145 2009-07-17.txt:22:01:32: <oklopol> esperanto, i presume?
|
|
|
146 2009-07-17.txt:22:02:49: <oklopol> you can also translate the esperanto in case there were subtle errors
|
|
|
147 2009-07-17.txt:22:03:24: <oklopol> for the esperanto
|
|
|
148 2009-07-17.txt:22:04:15: <oklopol> do realize i don't know even one word of esperanto
|
|
|
149 2009-07-26.txt:02:02:18: <pikhq> What, no Esperanto?
|
|
|
150 2009-09-10.txt:07:28:35: <Rugxulo> in (drum roll please) Esperanto, an artificial spoken language older than all of us combined (1887)
|
|
|
151 2009-09-10.txt:07:30:05: <ais523> esperanto!
|
|
|
152 2009-09-10.txt:07:30:08: <Rugxulo> (good ol' "esperanto-postfix" in Emacs, heh)
|
|
|
153 2009-09-10.txt:07:30:28: <ehird> esperanto is boring :|
|
|
|
154 2009-09-10.txt:07:31:34: <Rugxulo> why is Esperanto boring?
|
|
|
155 2009-09-10.txt:09:39:14: <Rugxulo> "Because Esperanto is not compatible with Electronic devices, most Esperantists have gotten by using the letters h, x, ^, and 卐. So the sentence 'good morning' becomes 'hxx^卐h^ 卐xh^x'."
|
|
|
156 2009-09-22.txt:23:35:31: <ErroneousDonk> NO ESPERANTO IN THIS CHANNEL
|
|
|
157 2009-10-22.txt:07:22:45: <madbrain> kinda like esperanto or lojban?
|
|
|
158 2009-10-22.txt:07:23:34: <madbrain> dunno for lojban but esperanto is afaik basically a romance language
|
|
|
159 2009-12-09.txt:01:08:43: <pikhq> uorygl: Mi pensas ke vi bezonas studadi Esperanton.
|
|
|
160 2009-12-09.txt:01:09:30: <uorygl> It would be nice if I knew how to ask how to say stuff in Esperanto in Esperanto.
|
|
|
161 2009-12-09.txt:01:11:23: <pikhq> La vorto "foo" en Esperanto estas kion?
|
|
|
162 2009-12-09.txt:01:11:40: <pikhq> (... I think; my Esperanto isn't *that* good.)
|
|
|
163 2009-12-09.txt:01:11:55: <uorygl> Also to ask the meaning of an Esperanto thing.
|
|
|
164 2009-12-09.txt:01:24:22: <ais523> I don't know about Esperanto
|
|
|
165 2009-12-09.txt:01:31:31: <pikhq> ais523: It's roughly the same phoneme in Esperanto.
|
|
|
166 2010-01-06.txt:06:22:43: * uorygl seaborgiates Esperanto.
|
|
|
167 2010-01-26.txt:02:09:42: <pikhq> Sgeo: Ne; mi nun studadas Esperanton.
|
|
|
168 2010-01-26.txt:02:10:04: <Sgeo> "No, I <something> study Esperanto"
|
|
|
169 2010-01-26.txt:02:10:40: <pikhq> "No, I'm studying Esperanto"
|
|
|
170 2010-02-28.txt:19:00:12: <pikhq> "M' sxat' vid' l' lingv'.", I say in horrifically butchered Esperanto.
|
|
|
171 2010-02-28.txt:22:36:50: <oerjan> <pikhq> "M' sxat' vid' l' lingv'.", I say in horrifically butchered Esperanto.
|
|
|
172 2010-02-28.txt:22:37:25: <zzo38> I don't know Esperanto language very well what does that mean please?
|
|
|
173 2010-03-30.txt:19:57:15: <uorygl> Unfortunately, I don't know enough Esperanto to construct a meaningful response.
|
|
|
174 2010-04-01.txt:04:26:14: <Sgeo> (I don't know how to say yes in Lojban, so I said it in Esperanto)
|
|
|
175 2010-04-23.txt:21:07:55: <alise> Ixnay on the Esperanto. Ay.
|
|
|
176 2010-04-29.txt:04:22:23: <pikhq> And his crimes against Esperanto.
|
|
|
177 2010-04-29.txt:15:01:41: <AnMaster> <pikhq> And his crimes against Esperanto. <-- that I haven't heard about
|
|
|
178 2010-05-10.txt:03:27:52: <Sgeo> Cxu vi parolas Esperanton?
|
|
|
179 2010-05-10.txt:03:34:26: <trap15> esperanto sux
|
|
|
180 2010-05-10.txt:03:34:52: <lament> esperanto is great, IF YOU WANNA GET BANNED
|
|
|
181 2010-05-10.txt:03:35:41: <Sgeo> Why is Esperanto bad?
|
|
|
182 2010-05-10.txt:03:38:24: <Sgeo> Mi malbone parolas Esperanton.
|
|
|
183 2010-05-10.txt:03:39:05: <Sgeo> Esperanton parolas malbone mi.
|
|
|
184 2010-05-11.txt:22:30:52: <Rugxulo> (sees topic) "Esperanto is still bannable!" ... huh??
|
|
|
185 2010-05-11.txt:22:40:14: <Rugxulo> Esperanto
|
|
|
186 2010-05-12.txt:01:44:03: <Sgeo_> Is Esperanto considered a foreign language?
|
|
|
187 2010-05-12.txt:14:36:52: <Rugxulo> <Sgeo_> Is Esperanto considered a foreign language?
|
|
|
188 2010-07-08.txt:00:09:30: <pikhq> "KIAL" be ESPERANTO for WHY
|
|
|
189 2010-07-08.txt:00:09:52: <pikhq> (where ESPERANTO is an all-caps variant of Esperanto. :P)
|
|
|
190 2010-08-13.txt:02:18:17: <DeannaTroi> Cxu iu parolas Esperanton?
|
|
|
191 2010-08-13.txt:02:18:47: <Warrigal> Mi esperanto es aún peor que mi italiano.
|
|
|
192 2010-08-13.txt:02:19:38: <Warrigal> Mi sueco es aún peor que mi esperanto.
|
|
|
193 2010-08-21.txt:23:43:14: * Sgeo is just being an Esperanto nut
|
|
|
194 2010-09-12.txt:06:31:10: <pikhq> No, no, no. Esperanto written with kanji should be the official language of nomics. :P
|
|
|
195 2010-09-18.txt:01:52:53: <EOF> i was talking in a channel about constructed languages, and somebody mentioned the esotericity of Esperanto
|
|
|
196 2010-09-19.txt:02:34:03: <EOF> http://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maldika_strukturo in Esperanto
|
|
|
197 2010-09-19.txt:02:34:42: <pikhq> EOF: Mia Esperanto malbonas. Japanalingvo?
|
|
|
198 2010-10-10.txt:03:32:43: <Rugxulo> pikhq, Esperanto? (yeah, I knew you'd hate that) ... just saying, Unicode is fine in moderately reasonable doses ;-)
|
|
|
199 2010-10-14.txt:00:29:55: <Sgeo> Is it "Yes" and I forgot to type the accent? Is it if? Is it actually Esperanto, and "one"
|
|
|
200 2010-10-14.txt:00:33:04: <Sgeo> Gregor, Spanish and Esperanto, unless my memory fails
|
|
|
201 2010-10-27.txt:03:29:23: <Sasha> There was a period there where I was fluent in /ESPERANTO/
|
|
|
202 2010-10-27.txt:03:29:38: <elliott> a few people here know esperanto
|
|
|
203 2010-10-27.txt:03:29:57: <pikhq> elliott: Jes, sed mia Esperanto malbonas.
|
|
|
204 2010-10-27.txt:03:32:56: <Mathnerd314> so what has everyone who knew Esperanto switched to instead? Lojban?
|
|
|
205 2010-10-27.txt:03:33:21: <pikhq> Mathnerd314: Esperanto is still the most viable auxlang.
|
|
|
206 2010-10-27.txt:03:36:14: <pikhq> Mathnerd314: At the time, a very large number of Esperanto speakers were in Poland. And Jewish.
|
|
|
207 2010-10-27.txt:03:37:48: <elliott> Is it Esperanto policy to uppercase SURNAMES?
|
|
|
208 2010-10-27.txt:03:39:33: <pikhq> elliott: The uppercasing of surnames is somewhat more common in Esperanto than elsewhere. It's actually a convention in Latin-script-using languages where the surname might be ambiguous.
|
|
|
209 2010-11-06.txt:04:59:47: <elliott> pikhq: Hey, what languages do you know apart from English, Japanese and Esperanto? I want to give you Dashernonsense for you tot ranslate :P
|
|
|
210 2010-11-07.txt:03:56:54: <elliott> pikhq: Esperanto for "win"?
|
|
|
211 2010-11-30.txt:00:00:09: <Sasha> Esperanto
|
|
|
212 2010-11-30.txt:00:02:10: <Sasha> What's the Esperanto of the computer world?
|
|
|
213 2010-11-30.txt:00:02:51: <quintopia> and the opposite of esperanto, whatever that is, is INTERCAL
|
|
|
214 2010-12-19.txt:02:00:27: <oerjan> olsner: _maybe_ esperanto?
|
|
|
215 2011-01-30.txt:02:10:54: <Sgeo> I should learn Coq. And Standard ML. And Erlang. And Esperanto.
|
|
|
216 2011-02-05.txt:01:28:34: <elliott> Terminus Font is a clean, fixed width bitmap font, designed for long (8 and more hours per day) work with computers. Version 4.32 contains 850 characters, covers about 120 language sets and supports ISO8859-1/2/5/7/9/13/15/16, Paratype-PT154/PT254, KOI8-R/U/E/F, Esperanto, many IBM, Windows and Macintosh code pages, as well as the IBM VGA, vt100 and xterm pseudographic characters.
|
|
|
217 2011-08-20.txt:07:44:27: <NihilistDandy> pikhq_: That's because Esperanto's such a trainwreck
|
|
|
218 2011-08-29.txt:20:01:50: <itidus20> the problem with conlangs such as lojban and esperanto is they cheapen the value of language developing naturally
|
|
|
219 2011-09-15.txt:00:10:02: <itidus20> `log esperanto
|
|
|
220 2011-09-15.txt:00:10:05: <HackEgo> 2007-07-13.txt:21:27:58: <oklokok> pikhq: esperanto isn't that good, judging by what i've read about it
|
|
|
221 2011-09-15.txt:00:10:56: <itidus20> `log esperanto
|
|
|
222 2011-09-15.txt:00:10:59: <HackEgo> 2007-05-31.txt:20:28:35: <Pikhq> Ne, ne, ne! Lernu Esperanton.
|
|
|
223 2011-09-15.txt:00:11:07: <itidus20> `log esperanto
|
|
|
224 2011-09-15.txt:00:11:10: <HackEgo> 2006-08-26.txt:01:32:32: <pikhq> ihope: Ne. Esperanto.
|
|
|
225 2011-09-15.txt:00:11:30: <itidus20> `log esperanto
|
|
|
226 2011-09-15.txt:00:11:34: <HackEgo> 2008-06-02.txt:15:08:16: <pikhq> I'd tend to say "Esperanto parolas vin", BTW.
|
|
|
227 2011-09-15.txt:02:03:02: <itidus20> `pastelogs esperanto
|
